Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Long-Distance Demo Of Solar-Powered Wireless Power Transmission Technology
Solar Daily ^ | Long-Distance Demo Of Solar-Powered Wireless Power Transmission Technology

Posted on 09/12/2008 8:29:11 AM PDT by Realism

Long-Distance Demo Of Solar-Powered Wireless Power Transmission Technology

Illustration only.

Washington DC (SPX) Sep 11, 2008 Space solar power could be a clean, renewable solution to America's long-term energy needs. John C. Mankins, former manager of NASA's Exploration Systems Research and Technology Program, and one of the foremost experts on space solar power, will announce a milestone demonstration of the critical technology enabling SSP: long-distance, solar-powered wireless power transmission.

(Excerpt) Read more at solardaily.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: energy; renewables; solar

1 posted on 09/12/2008 8:29:11 AM PDT by Realism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Realism

Half the planet is bathed in solar radiation. Why do we need a satellite to collect it?


2 posted on 09/12/2008 8:33:15 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Realism

3 posted on 09/12/2008 8:34:58 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Realism
I just checked. It's on at 9 PM today (central time).

Thanks for posting.

4 posted on 09/12/2008 8:42:33 AM PDT by davisfh ( Islam is a very serious mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Realism

All of your solar radiation are belong to us.


5 posted on 09/12/2008 8:45:30 AM PDT by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
"Half the planet is bathed in solar radiation. Why do we need a satellite to collect it? "

I'm certainly not an expert, but I would assume that much of the incoming solar energy is either absorbed or reflected by the atmosphere, not to mention the consideration of cloudcover.

Put high enough and in the correct orbit, a satellite would be bathed in sunlight constantly, rather than being affected by the day/night cycle.

Not sure which of the above is more signficant, and it will be very interesting to see how the transmission of energy is accomplished, as well as the possibilities of this device being used intentionally or otherwise as a weapon.
6 posted on 09/12/2008 9:04:29 AM PDT by chrisser (The Two Americas: Those that want to be coddled, Those that want to be left the hell alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

“the possibilities of this device being used intentionally or otherwise as a weapon.”

Hm, kind of like a giant magnifying glass on a bunch of ants.

The major advantage of a satellite over a large solar array in a desert that I can think of would be to avoid red-tape associated with environmental impact studies. But even there, I’d expect problems.


7 posted on 09/12/2008 9:11:37 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

It’s unlikely space based solar power would ever be competitive with ground-based coal, nuclear or even ground-based solar power.

It would have use in niche applications such as space-to-space power transmission and possibly some military applications.

The application to weapons would be there as well, not sure if that would be a driving force for it’s development though since a compact nuclear power source would be better suited for such an application.


8 posted on 09/12/2008 9:11:38 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Realism

Big distance means big loss of power.
Who’s responsible for aiming this thing properly,so that it doesn’t roast a bunch of people? Can we trust them?


9 posted on 09/12/2008 9:22:38 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Realism

Another crack Technology Program from NASA what next a fire on a stick?


10 posted on 09/12/2008 9:33:03 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

for the renewable energy ping list... though I haven’t read the article yet


11 posted on 09/12/2008 10:04:55 AM PDT by Kevmo (Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

“Space solar power” — Gerard K. O’Neill ping?


12 posted on 09/12/2008 10:16:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

satellites can concentrate the sun’s light in space efficiently where there is no atmosphere and then beam it to the surface of the Earth almost 24 hours a day.


13 posted on 09/12/2008 11:48:41 AM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BooksForTheRight.com

The focus of energy from a satellite would be a function of the
pointing of the satellite. If the beam goes off the ground antenna,
the beam would be defocused for safety.


14 posted on 09/12/2008 11:51:15 AM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Gerard K. O’Neill ping?

Yup. Remember reading Colonies in Space a couple of decades ago ;)

Keep hearing about mass drivers here and there too.

Prophet before his time.

15 posted on 09/12/2008 3:07:53 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead and will write him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

16 posted on 09/14/2008 2:56:12 AM PDT by Uncledave (Zombie Reagan '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Not necessary. The beam is low intensity. when it arrives at the Rectenna, (rectifying antenna), it will be converted to the power level necessary for transmission to your house. It was over 20 years ago that NASA tested this theory by transmitting this type of micro wave energy between to mountain top antennas at White Sands.

Dr O'Neill was an outta this world class physicist and all the theoretical work has been done. Build it and we can begin our trek to the stars with the profits generated by this system. that's what his book, "The High Frontier" is all about.

17 posted on 09/14/2008 8:23:40 AM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BooksForTheRight.com
Who’s responsible for aiming this thing properly,so that it doesn’t roast a bunch of people? Can we trust them?

Doesn't matter who it is - we can't trust them.

18 posted on 09/14/2008 12:02:39 PM PDT by GOPJ (Biden and Obama voted for the "bridge to No-Where".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

thanks, bfl


19 posted on 09/14/2008 9:45:32 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson