Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God or a multiverse?
Guardian ^ | December 8 2008 | Mark Vernon

Posted on 12/08/2008 11:56:24 AM PST by Soliton

Is there a God or a multiverse? Does modern cosmology force us to choose? Is it the case that the apparent fine-tuning of constants and forces to make the universe just right for life means there is either a need for a "tuner" or else a cosmos in which every possible variation of these constants and forces exists somewhere?

This choice has provoked anxious comment in the pages of this week's New Scientist. It follows an article in Discover magazine, in which science writer Tim Folger quoted cosmologist Bernard Carr: "If you don't want God, you'd better have a multiverse."

Even strongly atheistic physicists seem to believe the choice is unavoidable. Steven Weinberg, the closest physics comes to a Richard Dawkins, told the eminent biologist: "If you discovered a really impressive fine-tuning ... I think you'd really be left with only two explanations: a benevolent designer or a multiverse."

The anxiety in the New Scientist stems in part from the way this apparent choice has been leapt upon by the intelligent design people. Scientists don't like that since it seems to suggest that ID offers a theory that cosmologists are taking seriously. It doesn't of course: ID wasn't science before the multiverse hypothesis gained prominence, just a few years ago; and it hasn't become science since.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: cosmology; id; multiverse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-170 next last
To: Soliton
I vote for multiverse

No accountability that way.

61 posted on 12/08/2008 1:26:50 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

No


62 posted on 12/08/2008 1:27:18 PM PST by svcw (Great selection of Christmas gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I was referring to this statement by a poster

God, for believers, is the condition without which science cannot even get going; divinity is a final explanation for the laws of science, as a philosopher of religion would say.

I saw something of your "first reality" in this statement sister bird

63 posted on 12/08/2008 1:31:04 PM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
I sincerely cannot see how someone can believe in something they can't even define

Describe your love for your children and then tell me you indeed love your children.

I can't define such a thing myself and I love my wife and children deeply.

64 posted on 12/08/2008 1:32:02 PM PST by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
No I'm stating the theory

You mean the theory is that there's all these universes and there's like some geometry and material and stuff?

That's a good theory, man.

65 posted on 12/08/2008 1:35:02 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
I vote for multiverse

"Lots of scientific sounding words. Now let’s see his experiments that have validated his hypothesis. Without it, it is philosophy resulting in an hypothesis, not science."

66 posted on 12/08/2008 1:35:29 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
I can't define such a thing myself and I love my wife and children deeply.

I am glad you do, but believing in things you don't understand is superstion (Stevie Wonder)

67 posted on 12/08/2008 1:35:46 PM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
I vote for multiverse

"Lots of scientific sounding words. Now let’s see his experiments that have validated his hypothesis. Without it, it is philosophy resulting in an hypothesis, not science."

Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2144924/posts?page=19#19

Imagine that......

68 posted on 12/08/2008 1:36:17 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
Define "God"?

If God was definable, He wouldn't BE God.

69 posted on 12/08/2008 1:36:53 PM PST by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: metmom
All it is is positing a *source* without it being an entity to which one may have to answer.

LOLOL! Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear metmom!

70 posted on 12/08/2008 1:37:11 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Soliton; tpanther

Stevie Wonder? Oh, yes, that great theological giant.


71 posted on 12/08/2008 1:38:41 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
If God was definable, He wouldn't BE God.

The Bible describes God. Do you read the Bible?

72 posted on 12/08/2008 1:40:32 PM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
I am glad you do, but believing in things you don't understand is superstion

Would it be reasonable to believe that Soliton possesses consciousness?

73 posted on 12/08/2008 1:41:03 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: svcw; betty boop; Soliton
Thank you for your reply!

But if Soliton is accurate and what you say that science and God are not compatible, well then you are wrong.

We do not say that at all, quite the contrary.

An astrophysicist reviewer wrote of our book Don't let science get you down, Timothy,

"one of the rare attempts nowadays to restore the unity of science and religion. It presents a good picture of present-day science, focusing on the perennial great questions regarding the relations between Man and the Universe. It attempts the virtually impossible: to present a constructive dialog of diametrically opposed worldviews. It succeeds in opening a challenging avenue of conversation between materialists and open-minded religious people…."


74 posted on 12/08/2008 1:41:09 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

Weak. There is a difference in describing and defining.


75 posted on 12/08/2008 1:43:10 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
But if Soliton is accurate and what you say that science and God are not compatible, well then you are wrong.

He simply misunderstood what I was referring to and either didn't reply to me or I missed it.

Now I see the reason for the confusion. I was referring to your first -second reality dichotomy with God's creation being the first reality (or just reality) and that the laws of physics depending on that reality

76 posted on 12/08/2008 1:45:55 PM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Soliton; tpanther
I am glad you do, but believing in things you don't understand is superstion (Stevie Wonder)

But you vote for multiverses.

Are you saying that you understand this?

Do you understand string theory?

Do you understand singularity and the origins of the universe?

Do you understand black holes?

Dark matter?

Job 40:6-8 Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm and said,

"Now gird up your loins like a man; I will ask you, and you instruct Me.

"Will you really annul My judgment?

Will you condemn Me that you may be justified?

77 posted on 12/08/2008 1:47:04 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Would it be reasonable to believe that Soliton possesses consciousness?

I was stalked on FR by a poster who told everyone I was an artificial intelligence program, so maybe not.

78 posted on 12/08/2008 1:47:39 PM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CE2949BB
The multiverse theory is absurd. Talk to me when you can test it

You took the words out of my mouth. Hypotheses which can't be tested, even in principle, do not belong to science. It certainly is ironic that atheists are now the principle practitioners of metaphysics. Talking about multiverses is akin to the way medieval folks allegedly debated how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.

79 posted on 12/08/2008 1:50:44 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

Yeah right, I stalked you. I chased you around with a question, framed as an analogy, that you refuse to deal with.

The bottom line is you won’t answer the question because you know it undermines your whole deal here on FR. You demand proof of God yet you can’t even prove the existence of your own mind.


80 posted on 12/08/2008 1:53:25 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson