Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prediction: Obama will use military force to dissolve State Capitals that oppose his plans
Me | 02-18-09 | Vanity

Posted on 02/18/2009 10:12:23 AM PST by prismsinc

I'm running this outcome in my head. Based on what Rush has confirmed for me, that Obama wants to punish achievers, combined with his rampant silent signing of executive orders, and other conclusions I've come to, this seems inevitable to me.

Many States seem to be preparing to oppose the Stimulus. The outcome here can only go this way, especially if Obama is as bitter as Rush claims.

Thoughts everyone?


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: mightyhostinthesun; staringatthesun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
When I studied Obama's history, I noticed that his family moved around frequently. It was quite obvious from his past that his family were active Communist sympathizers, and in those days, this was a flag for the Feds. His family must've felt displaced and hated by their country. I concluded that Obama WANTS TO DISPLACE AS MANY AMERICAN FAMILIES AS POSSIBLE. This explains his passive aggressive behavior.
1 posted on 02/18/2009 10:12:23 AM PST by prismsinc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

WRKO keeps playing an ad about “Neighborhood Diversity”. I wonder where I’m being moved to?


2 posted on 02/18/2009 10:15:38 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc
Not the Military. They swear to uphold the Constitution.

Look to the National Civilian Security force (as big as, as armed as, and as well funded as the military) They will swear personal loyalty to 0bama.

3 posted on 02/18/2009 10:16:51 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 29 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc
I'm running this outcome in my head.

Well, there's your problem right there....

4 posted on 02/18/2009 10:16:56 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

Shoot.

He’s determined to replace DC for the NorthAmericanUnion

State capitals are dirt under his toenails.

Treasonous bustard.


5 posted on 02/18/2009 10:17:32 AM PST by Quix (POL BOSSES say fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

No. He’d have little to gain and much to lose. Besides, Obama is a naive politician in over his head, not the second coming of Stalin.

The more likely danger is that if the economy gets really bad, prominent entrepreneurs and maybe even right-wing voices will get arrested on dubious charges to the cheers of the Moveon.org crowd. That would be a dangerous precedent.


6 posted on 02/18/2009 10:19:03 AM PST by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

And no one has challenged this unconstitutional POS in court yet!

I guess all the lawyers are too busy chasing ambulances and fighting personal injury cases to take on something important, like defending the Constitution.


7 posted on 02/18/2009 10:19:11 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

LOL funny!

Seriously! Am I missing something?


8 posted on 02/18/2009 10:19:18 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

17,000 more Constitution Upholders heading overseas soon...


9 posted on 02/18/2009 10:20:36 AM PST by IrishPennant ("We're surrounded...That simplifies our problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

Using the U.S. military to enforce controversial policies would be a mistake. Many soldiers would refuse orders, creating chaos and probably mutiny that could spread rapidly.


10 posted on 02/18/2009 10:22:12 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
That is more likely! He told us upfront how he wants to do it.

Obama's Civilian National Security Force

11 posted on 02/18/2009 10:22:33 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

*shrug* That’s how the SS got its start...


12 posted on 02/18/2009 10:23:27 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 29 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

That happens all the time in nations overtaken by Marxists


13 posted on 02/18/2009 10:23:32 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

“Capitols” perhaps?

I’m sure Larry Nichols is probably saying the same...


14 posted on 02/18/2009 10:23:41 AM PST by mgstarr ("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

Yeah I debated that one! didn’t check it though...


15 posted on 02/18/2009 10:24:25 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

Not according to Dictionary.com. I just looked it up. “Capitals” appears to be the correct usage.


16 posted on 02/18/2009 10:26:32 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; All

However he does it, “Officials with military weapons” is my point. Let’s stay on cue.


17 posted on 02/18/2009 10:27:51 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc

Fail


18 posted on 02/18/2009 10:29:54 AM PST by bigbob (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

>> Shoot.

If it comes down to it, I plan to.


19 posted on 02/18/2009 10:30:29 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc
Your premise is wrong. Why would he have to use the military? There will be little or no resistance to this as the people gradually start to demand they get their share of the pie. Too many people are comparing Obama to the book 1984 when what they should be doing is reading--not Atlas Shrugged but Brave New World. Obamism won't be forced on the nation. It will be embraced and welcomed.
20 posted on 02/18/2009 10:31:10 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life Capitalist American Atheist and Free-Speech Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson