Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BECK REJECTS ALL OF HITLER’S DEMANDS (5/6/39)
Microfiche-New York Times archives, McHenry Library, U.C. Santa Cruz | 5/6/39 | Jerzy Szapiro

Posted on 05/06/2009 5:36:09 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket



TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: realtime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
If you would like to be added to or deleted from the Real Time +/- 70 Years ping list, send me a freepmail. You can also search for these articles by the keyword realtime, going back to the first one on January 27, 2008. These articles are posted on the 70th anniversary of their original publication date. See my profile for additional information.
1 posted on 05/06/2009 5:36:10 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
THE PACT OF STEEL

Although the top brass of the Wehrmacht had a low opinion of Italian military power, Hitler now pressed for a military alliance with Italy, which Mussolini had been in no hurry to conclude. Staff talks between the two high commands began in April and Keitel reported to OKW his "impression" that neither the Italian fighting services nor Italian rearmament were in very good shape. A war, he thought, would have to be decided quickly, or the Italians would be out of it.

By mid-April, as his diary shows, Ciano was alarmed by increasing signs that Germany might attack Poland at any moment and precipitate a European war for which Italy was not prepared. When, on April 20, Ambassador Attolico in Berlin wired Rome that German action against Poland was "imminent" Ciano urged him to hasten arrangements for his meeting with Ribbentrop so that Italy would not be caught napping.

The two foreign ministers met at Milan on May 6. Ciano had arrived with written instructions from Mussolini to emphasize to the Germans that Italy wished to avoid war for at least three years. To the Italian's surprise, Ribbentrop agreed that Germany wished to keep the peace for that long too. In fact, Ciano found the German Foreign Minister "for the first time" in a "pleasantly calm state of mind." They reviewed the situation in Europe, agreed on improving Axis relations with the Soviet Union and adjourned for a gala dinner.

When after dinner Mussolini telephoned to see how the talks had gone, and Ciano replied that they had gone well, the Duce had a sudden brain storm. He asked his son-in-law to release to the press a communiqué saying that Germany and Italy had decided to conclude a military alliance. Ribbentrop at first hesitated. He finally agreed to put the matter up to Hitler, and the Fuehrer, when reached by telephone, readily agreed to Mussolini's suggestion.

Thus, on a sudden impulse, after more than a year of hesitation, Mussolini committed himself irrevocably to Hitler's fortunes. This was one of the first signs that the Italian dictator, like the German, was beginning to lose that iron self-control which up until this year of 1939 had enabled them both to pursue their own national interests with ice-cold clarity. The consequences for Mussolini would soon prove disastrous.

William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich

2 posted on 05/06/2009 5:38:15 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
Photobucket


3 posted on 05/06/2009 5:40:03 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fredhead; r9etb; PzLdr; dfwgator; Paisan; From many - one.; rockinqsranch; GRRRRR; 2banana; ...

“Pact of Steel” update at #2. Standings at #3. Boston is in first place in both leagues.


4 posted on 05/06/2009 5:41:48 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

5/6/39 NYT Price: $0.03

The New York Times is expected to raise its cover prices again since they last raised it 11 months ago from $1.25 to $1.50. To try and make up for plummeting advertising revenue, they are expected to raise the newsstand price from $1.50 to $2.00 during the week and from $5 to $6 for the national Sunday edition, effective June 1. The New York edition will cost $5, still a one-dollar increase.

Strictly based on inflation the cost would be $0.46 or probably $0.50 with rounding.


5 posted on 05/06/2009 5:42:53 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
If you would like to be added to or deleted from the Real Time +/- 70 Years ping list...

When you post something from +70 years let me know. I want to know what it's going to be like 70 years from now. :)

6 posted on 05/06/2009 5:44:47 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Why’s the date: May 6th, 1989?


7 posted on 05/06/2009 5:49:10 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Obama, the American Allende.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Well, it looked like an ‘8’. And my first thought at seeing the headline, Glenn Beck rejects all of Hitler’s demands? Well, good for him!


8 posted on 05/06/2009 5:53:26 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Obama, the American Allende.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

I thought the same thing, when I first saw the headline!
Good for Glenn Beck!!!!!


9 posted on 05/06/2009 5:57:16 AM PDT by Radagast the Fool ("Mexico-Beirut with tacos!"--Dr. Zoidberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool

me too


10 posted on 05/06/2009 6:11:10 AM PDT by Blogger (It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

LOL, me three.


11 posted on 05/06/2009 6:21:17 AM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

bump


12 posted on 05/06/2009 6:51:37 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool

Substitute “Obama” for “Hitler” and the headline becomes timely...


13 posted on 05/06/2009 7:02:27 AM PDT by mikrofon (NObama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Glenn Beck?


14 posted on 05/06/2009 8:09:33 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
When you post something from +70 years let me know. I want to know what it's going to be like 70 years from now. :)


15 posted on 05/06/2009 8:10:30 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
On May 7, Colonel Guenther Blumentritt of the Army General Staff, who with Generals von Rundstedt and von Manstein formed a small “Working Staff,” submitted an estimate of the situation for Case White. Actually it was a plan for the conquest of Poland. It was an imaginative and daring plan, and it would be followed with very few changes.

William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich

From the moment when Molotov became Foreign Commissar he pursued the policy of an arrangement with Germany at the expense of Poland. It was not very long before the French became aware of this. There is a remarkable dispatch by the French Ambassador in Berlin, dated May 7, published in the French Yellow Book, which states that on his secret information he was sure that a Fourth Partition of Poland was to be the basis of the German-Russian rapprochement. "Since the month of May," writes M. Daladier in April 1946, "the U.S.S.R. had conducted two negotiations, one with France, the other with Germany. She appeared to prefer to partition rather than to defend Poland. Such was the immediate cause of the Second World War." But there were other causes too.

Winston S. Churchill, The Gathering Storm

16 posted on 05/07/2009 6:05:52 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredhead; r9etb; PzLdr; dfwgator; Paisan; From many - one.; rockinqsranch; GRRRRR; 2banana; ...

5/7/39 update at #16. Case White and wooing Stalin.


17 posted on 05/07/2009 6:08:00 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
Poles say Berlin must decide whether there will be peace.

I guess it's easy to look back in hindsight at the incredible foolishness of such an attitude, but there were some that saw through Hitler's nonsense.

But not the Poles, apparently.

18 posted on 05/07/2009 6:28:12 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

More like today to me.


19 posted on 05/07/2009 9:50:28 AM PDT by mainestategop (MAINE: The way communism should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fredhead; r9etb; PzLdr; dfwgator; Paisan; From many - one.; rockinqsranch; GRRRRR; 2banana; ...
The British government did not reply until May 8 to the Soviet proposals of April 16 for a military alliance. The response was a virtual rejection. It strengthened suspicions in Moscow that Chamberlain was not willing to make a military pact with Russia to prevent Hitler from taking Poland.

William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich

20 posted on 05/08/2009 5:32:03 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson