Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RENAME THE "PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT" IN HONOR OF MICHAEL JACKSON!
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 05/04/2009 | Bob Unruh is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.

Posted on 06/29/2009 6:18:46 AM PDT by Dawebman

Next on Senate agenda?

'Pedophile Protection Act'

'Hate crimes' law definitions would protect 547 sex 'philias'

The leader of a pro-family organization says families across the nation need to contact their U.S. senators now to try to derail a legislative plan that already has passed the U.S. House and is being awaited by President Obama – after a Democrat confirmed it would protect "all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or 'paraphilias' listed by the American Psychiatric Association."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; culturewar; democratscandals; foleygate; homosexualagenda; hypocrites; immorality; insanity; kinsey; liberral; pedophile; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren
RENAME THE "PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT" TO HONOR MICHAEL JACKSON!
1 posted on 06/29/2009 6:18:47 AM PDT by Dawebman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawebman

...and DUKE UNIVERSITY.


2 posted on 06/29/2009 6:26:02 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman
NO!...Name the Pedophile Protection Act after ..Frank Lombard...

..who is gay....who adopted an African American baby...

..who molested this child since birth...

..and who offered this child for sexual purposes on the Internet to other deviants...

..and who is NOT getting enough media covererage of his sick, perverted acts!

Let this Duke professor be the poster pervert for adoption of children by gays!!

3 posted on 06/29/2009 6:26:43 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman

> RENAME THE “PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT” TO HONOR MICHAEL JACKSON!

De mortuis nil nisi bonum. It’s best that way.


4 posted on 06/29/2009 6:41:22 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman
Questions for me are;
How do you prove you are Gay or Not Gay?

How I do I prove that I am a sexual deviant that needs protection under the law?

Do I have to demonstrate my deviance before a Judge or review board?

Do I have to be a member of an approved club or group?

How perverted do I have to be?

How long do I have to be gay, will an hour do?

Many more are out the I am sure but you get the point.

5 posted on 06/29/2009 6:57:50 AM PDT by fuzzybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman

Gee...strange it’s not getting much MEDIA attention, huh?


6 posted on 06/29/2009 7:01:44 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman
The leader of a pro-family organization says families across the nation need to contact their U.S. senators now to try to derail a legislative plan that already has passed the U.S. House and is being awaited by President Obama – after a Democrat confirmed it would protect "all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or 'paraphilias' listed by the American Psychiatric Association."

The sex positive agenda marches on.

It isn't about "consenting adults". The Sex Positive agenda (as pushed by Reich, Kinsey, and feminists) seeks to end ALL moral judgments over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). They see sexual pleasure as a birthright to be enjoyed at all stages of life without conscience. They oppose abstinence "education" because they consider it unhealthy to supress sexual desires.

7 posted on 06/29/2009 10:58:46 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

moral absolutes ping


8 posted on 06/29/2009 10:59:05 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawebman

And to think that the Democrats came to power in 2006 by exploiting public revulsion at the details leaked about Foley and the toe-tapper.


9 posted on 06/29/2009 11:00:25 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson