Posted on 07/13/2009 8:48:39 PM PDT by FARS
Obama eligibility case will be heard on the merits !! Please distribute everywhere.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter reportedly said the following: 1. There will be a trial. 2. It will be heard on the merits. 3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues. 4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority. 5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC. 6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
Only if it was a valid oath with one who qualifies.
If I would have put my hand over the mouth of the president on Inauguration Day and swore the oath instead, it would not be binding, for I would not have met the qualifications. In that case, they would be merely words.
Congress would not have to impeach me, nor would I have to resign. In the case of Obama, if it is true that he does not qualify, he’s a pretender and the oath would have been null and void from the first word spoken.
The crisis would be that all he has done, all that he has signed, wouldn’t be legal, as he lacked the authority to do so. It makes me mad just thinking about it.
No. His parents were married. His father, Obama Sr., registered his son as a British citizen. The law is clear: if you’re married to the child’s mother, you’re legally the father and responsible for the child.
All that crap about being “biologically” someone else’s son won’t hold up in a court of law and has no impact on citizenship.
I agree. I have always said he has probably lied about something of little consequence but now has to defend against exposure of that lie or his whole fabricated biography falls apart.
Bottomline I think he’s a citizen. That said, I think there is something embarrassing on this birth certificate. I believe it is that his parents were not married and although that would not be an issue today, it would have been when he was “dreaming” about his father and writing his biography. I don’t think the revelation that he’s illigitimate would harm him politically, but it would harm his ego and destroy his well crafter image.
I also think this chase keeps us looking at the right hand when we should be paying attention to the left. The passport/visa and college admissions info is where I think we might find the real story. Someone wanted his passport info back during the election, I wonder what they were looking for?
Follow the money, honey.
If this was about feelings and shame, he would’nt have spent hundreds of thousands on lawyers.
He knew this was coming, and was well geared up for it.
He thought.
Did he have his trusty teleprompter?
I agree, it would be ugly.
The dentist posted it.
It was about his trip to Pokiston (misspelling intended) when it was not possible to get a visa to do so on an American passport. The fact that he wrote about the trip and when the trip was made is the real question. If there is not a visa stamp in his passport, then the other lie is exposed or if he really did go, what passport did he use (Kenyan?)?
Don't think this is possible? I remember the weekend before they released Clinton's videotaped Grand Jury testimony. The "word" was that Clinton went completely ballistic on the tape, so his opponents were sucked in to saying how terrible it would be for the POTUS to lose his temper on tape. When the tape came out, with a cool, calm Clinton lying his @** off, everyone in the media was able to focus on the cool and calm part. The lying was downplayed.
“It was about his trip to Pokiston (misspelling intended) when it was not possible to get a visa to do so on an American passport. The fact that he wrote about the trip and when the trip was made is the real question. If there is not a visa stamp in his passport, then the other lie is exposed or if he really did go, what passport did he use (Kenyan?)?”
Perhaps Ayers wrote he went to Pakistan?
Somehow, why do I think nothing will come of this? It must be a lack of faith in the American people.
Now we really understand what the popular Algore was talking about when he mentioned “no controlling legal authority”.
I spelled that way to begin with and then changed it at the last second after reading his Bio.
I’m glad someone found the skinny on this goobhead...
“on the merits” is a term I figure means,”we know have our judge, who will hear everything that has had time to be prepared for, everything else will be overruled and not considered in the case, and that any dissenters will be destroyed” judge...
I expect that the time between the election and the time this circus begins gave them time to prepare this case...
They will win, and the argument will be closed...Anyone else who brings it up will be labeled a kook, and thoroughly destroyed...
The folks who could have really played this to the hilt, failed...And didn’t do it when the opportunity arose (like in the campaign, before and just after the primaries)...Doing it now handed the advantage to the Obama side of the equation...
2012 will be the best (and only) time to take care of this now...
Appears you have attempted to play a race card, erroneously, and it identifies you as the racist.
Nice try, Jessie.
There is irony here.
Obama has always had the playing field vacated during his past elections
“In 1996 Obama goes to court, challenges the petition signatures of mostly African-American voters, and gets all his rivals eliminated from the ballot and so de facto runs unopposed.
In 2004 sealed divorce records were strangely released destroying the chances of his chief Democratic rival Blair Hull; then in the general, lightning again struck, and Republican front-runner Jack Ryan’s sealed divorce records were likewise mysteriously released—and he too crashed, in effect, leaving Obama without a serious primary or general election rival.”
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjlhNTNmZjk2YmI4N2Y0Y2M2YmI2ZTE4MWVlNDYxNWE=
This time, could the ONE be vacated.
How juicy.
Well, we are a Banana Republic aren’t we???
Besides...I’m looking at all these folks posting, and wonder if anyone at least scanned this judges record, who appointed him, and if they really believe this judge will really put the merits of this issue at the forefront...
Does anyone really believe this guy (regardless of his military record) will declare an elected president of this country ineligible???
I mean, don’t anyone get me wrong...He needs to be tossed out onto the street, and if there was any “real” chance to do so, it should have been done WAYYYYYYYY before the election...
I think our chances stand better in the local elections, and the mid-terms, then the general election in 2012 to correct this problem...
Start by taking away his tools, then remove him in 2012...If we can...
The dipsticks will do everything they can along the way, and if we do not compel the party leadership to do it right, wee might as well wait till November 2016 to see who is still standing on the conservative side of the coin...
If we still have something to stand for...
Thanks for clearing that up - it was quite the stretch to try and turn “jig”, as used by the poster, into “jigaboo”.
thanks FARS!
additional:
Eligibility arguments to get court hearing
WorldNetDaily | July 13, 2009 | Bob Unruh
Posted on 07/13/2009 7:36:00 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2291955/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.