Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Science of One-Night Stands
Time ^ | Aug 11, 2009 | Tiffany Sharples

Posted on 08/12/2009 1:37:24 PM PDT by posterchild

n a confirmation of persistent stereotypes, an international team of psychologists have determined that when it comes to one-night stands, men have much lower standards than women do. The study, published in the journal Human Nature, revealed that when asked whether they would "go out with," "go home with," or "go to bed with," a member of the opposite sex, men were universally more willing than their female counterparts, regardless of how attractive the potential partner was. Women, in contrast, were much more picky—agreeing to head home or sleep with men only if they were very good looking.

The research is a follow up to a pioneering handful of studies of "short term mating" in which researchers sent young men and women on the prowl at a Florida university, instructing them to approach people attractive enough that they would actually consider sleeping with them, and within two sentences of conversation, see if they would agree to a date, a trip back to the questioner's apartment, or a roll in the hay. (Presumably, for research purposes they didn't actually need to follow through on the request, merely record the response.) Whereas no women would sleep with the investigators, and only 3% agreed to go back to their apartments, a full 75% of men agreed to sleep with the female questioners, regardless of how cute they were. (Not very, according to the study authors, who put both the male and female recruits somewhere between slightly unattractive and moderately attractive. Ouch.)

(Excerpt) Read more at wellness.blogs.time.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: genderwars; psychology
Wonder if they got grant for this.
1 posted on 08/12/2009 1:37:26 PM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Stimulus?


2 posted on 08/12/2009 1:57:14 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

That’s exactly what I thought. how many millions of tax dollars are being spent providing fat salaries for behavioral “science” researchers?


3 posted on 08/12/2009 1:57:14 PM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

As if we all didn’t already know this. And of course, it makes perfect biological sense. If a man can spread his seed around it’s to his genetic advantage. Especially if he’s not going to have to help raise the kid. Women, on the other hand, invest much into each offspring, so they have to be choosier. They get fewer chances to pass on their genes.


4 posted on 08/12/2009 1:59:12 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
They had to do a scientific study on this? LOL. Uh DUH!
5 posted on 08/12/2009 2:01:20 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

I think the “study” was probably a guy at a bar, trying to figure out why nobody was willing to sleep with him, even though he lowered his standards.


6 posted on 08/12/2009 2:03:18 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
The biology of "one-nighters" has been known for millenia. When it comes to one-nighters men "go down" the food chain but women "go up". Women will "do it" with a guy on a one night basis if that is the only way she can get to him. She will hope that he will "like it" and come back. Men OTOH figure that if they go down the food chain they don't have to go back. The biology of longer relationships is just the opposite. When men are willing to "settle down" they won't accept the same woman they would have a fling with. Women OTOH settle for security and companionship and will accept an offer carefully crafted over a courtship from a man they wouldn't dream of jumping into the sack with.

Just the way it is.

Μολὼν λάβε


7 posted on 08/12/2009 2:06:33 PM PDT by wastoute (translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Shocking results!


8 posted on 08/12/2009 2:06:55 PM PDT by pelicandriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelicandriver
Shocking results!

Yeah. Who would've guessed that girls don't wear "beer goggles"?
9 posted on 08/12/2009 2:12:46 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
This was conducted without the aid of alcohol or a good line of bull, which would of created slightly different results.
10 posted on 08/12/2009 2:19:55 PM PDT by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Pikers. The gold standard of research were the Europeans that got paid to study the brain activity of women having orgasms.
In some ways Europe is ahead of us.
Imagine going home after work. “Hard day at the office?”
“You have no idea.”


11 posted on 08/12/2009 2:20:26 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
"Women, in contrast, were much more picky—agreeing to head home or sleep with men only if they were very good looking. "

That explains my dry spell from 18-27.

12 posted on 08/12/2009 2:35:02 PM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Alex, gimme The Bleedin’ Obvious for a thousand...


13 posted on 08/12/2009 2:37:47 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dog breath

Wonder if the researcher stood poised with clipboard and pen awaiting the subject’s response.

Back in grad school I got lucky in a bar one night.

I saw a woman at the bar waiting for her drinks and I was taken by her beauty. My eyes followed her as she walked from the bar alone with her two drinks (it was 2 for the price of 1 night) and stopped at a railing on the balcony overlooking the dance floor. As I was planning on approaching her to chat her up some guy comes out of nowhere and walks up to her. He leans over and says something into her ear. She hadn’t even have a chance to take a sip of her drinks yet and she is now grabbing her coat and leaving with him!

Lucky for me I had the presence of mind to walk up to where she was standing and salvage the 2 untouched whiskey sours.


14 posted on 08/12/2009 2:49:15 PM PDT by posterchild (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
both the male and female recruits somewhere between slightly unattractive and moderately attractive.

Democrats!

15 posted on 08/12/2009 2:56:42 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obama is in way over his ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

On one hand, it does seem like a ridiculous waste of resources to prove what everyone knew anyway . . . men and women are just different and the old stereotypes often have some basis in fact. On the other hand, an awful lot of academics believe otherwise and I for one am glad to see evolutionary psychologists like David Buss and Stephen Pinker finally demonstrating that the blank slate picture of human nature is mostly just bunk.


16 posted on 08/12/2009 5:11:17 PM PDT by Good Ag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Also, short, fat, bald guys have a harder time overcoming their disadvantaged appearance if a long-term sharing of resources isn’t at stake.


17 posted on 08/12/2009 5:17:11 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson