Posted on 08/20/2009 12:04:03 PM PDT by Nikas777
The same is true today. In every "democracy" or "republic", the elected power structure holds the reins only so long as the army agrees. Even here in the US! After all, let's say Congress passed a treaty signed by the president requiring everybody to turn in their guns to the UN, or to abort their third child, or to become part of the Global Union. Do you think the US Army would let that happen? If you do, you're wrong. Sure, the top brass would probably go along, but some charismatic colonel somewhere would rally his men and roll the tanks into Washington D.C. It's called the "Seven Days in May" scenario.
In America, we call people with charisma "born leaders". You mostly see them on the football field, the movie set, at the head of the Boy Scout troop, and in other, similar locations. But given the right set of circumstances that popular quarterback, beloved film star, or Scoutmaster could be a Charlemagne, a Joan of Arc, a Francisco Franco.
This is one reason why I am a monarchist and an opponent of so-called popular government. God knows His own, and gives to some men -- as He did to the shepherd David -- the power to inspire the hearts of others. Those who dare topple a king -- even a bad one -- are going against the will of God. "I will not raise my hand against the Lord's anointed" -- 1 Sam 24:10
I’ve never heard of Replacement Theology. As for the “end times”, that rapture stuff is 100% baloney. Every day is the Day of Judgment for somebody. You or I could be catapulted into Eternity at any moment. THAT is the the only “end time” that we ought to be concerned about.
I pray to God that His mercy will cover each of us when our own individual “end of days” arrives.
Totally agree with your post.
HMMMMMMmmmmmm
More RC RUBBER "BIBLE" "THEOLOGY"
17After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. 1 Thessalonians 4:17 (The Message) 15-18And then this: We can tell you with complete confidencewe have the Master's word on itthat when the Master comes again to get us, those of us who are still alive will not get a jump on the dead and leave them behind. In actual fact, they'll be ahead of us. The Master himself will give the command. Archangel thunder! God's trumpet blast! He'll come down from heaven and the dead in Christ will risethey'll go first. Then the rest of us who are still alive at the time will be caught up with them into the clouds to meet the Master. Oh, we'll be walking on air! And then there will be one huge family reunion with the Master. So reassure one another with these words. 1 Thessalonians 4:17 (Amplified Bible) 17Then we, the living ones who remain [on the earth], shall simultaneously be caught up along with [the resurrected dead] in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and so always (through the eternity of the eternities) we shall be with the Lord!
Confidence in anything and/or anyone else but God and His Word is folly . . . whether it be bureaucratic magicstericals, local congregational traditions, denominational traditions, customs, heritage, in-group mentalities, fantasies, personages, . . .
GOD ALONE IS TRUSTWORTHY.
GOD ALONE IS SUFFICIENT.
CHRIST, GOD ALONE IS SALVATION.
GOD ALONE IS EVERLASTING PEACE AND LIFE.
GOD ALONE IS WORTHY.
CHRIST IS
COMING AGAIN . . . ALL EVIDENCE INDICATES IN THIS ERA AND A LOT SOONER than most seem to think.
Folks foolishly . . . with eternal level foolishness . . . ignore the evidence and the Scriptures related thereto.
Agreeing with man in contradiction to Scripture is hazardous.
I do agree that it’s a crucially vital personal hyper-priority to be clearly Biblically prepared for one’s own graduation from this life regardless of the timing or means of that.
Hmmm - and there’s the “Mitt Romney on Abortion” video right after this article. Coincidence,, acidental editorial, or unintended but funny juxtaposition? Anyway, it made me laugh.
If you deal with academia it is an occupational hazard.
I have been able to both defend orthodoxy and come up with explanations based on the historical truths as academia acknowledges them.
END TIMES AND UFO PING LISTS PING AT THE "A" MOST BASIC PING LEVEL.
The following excerpts are of the greatest interest and import, to me.
Certainly both novels play heavily on the fears and fear dynamics so dear to satan and his goons. Such fears are also persistently evident as major factors in the UFO abduction literature.
The fallen angel aspect has recently become much better documented with a study of more than 300 abduction cases by an associate of GUY MALONE. I forget his name and wont bother looking it up at the moment. Ive posted about it hereon before.
Such materials and information is available at Guys websites:
AND
The referenced documentation and conference video presentations are extensive from a high quality panel of seasoned and well educated experts from a diversity of relevant fields.
One of the more telling facts from such research is that 100% OF ALL the more famous researchers were surveyed by Guy about whether they had ever had any cases where the Name and Blood of Jesus applied, asserted in a situation had ever halted or prevented an abduction. 100% of those famous researchers ONLY UNDER CONDITIONS OF ANONYMITY--AFFIRMED THAT THEY HAD NUMEROUS SUCH CASES.
The study of more than 300 abduction cases brought to light that the Name of Jesus is not 100% effective in all cases. There are evidently cases wherelike with the demonized man in the New Testament who [when some jokers tried using the phrase Jesus whom Paul preaches to cast the demons out--asserted: Jesus I know, and Paul I know but who the . . . are you? before tearing the man up . . . there are cases where the person has evidently far too little association with, belief in Jesus for Jesus name to be functionally applicable to their protection. Thankfully, those cases are greatly in the minority of the 300+ cases of the study.
Guys experts make a distinction between demons and fallen angels. They assert that demons are the fallen angels who lost their bodies in the flood. Not all fallen angels did lose their bodies then. Some experts assert that some of the grays are bio-engineered suits that house demons so they can operate in visible tangible ways in this dimension.
I wanted to discover how far these extreme views were reflected in British ufology. Initially, I thought there was little evidence; then I scratched beneath the surface and found a mountain of literature and even a society dedicated to promoting the demonic theory. The former editor of Britains Flying Saucer Review, Gordon Creighton, was until his recent death the best-known demonologist in the UK. But what is not so well known is that, as recently as 1996, a group of concerned ufologists which included Creighton and the founding President of BUFORA, Graham Knewstub, privately circulated a report warning of the demonic origins of UFOs. The UFO Concern Report was copied to several hundred ufologists, MPs and peers of the realm and was endorsed by none other than Lord Hill-Norton, a former British Chief of Defence Staff. Hill-Norton, who died in 2003, shortly after Creighton, is usually quoted by UFO proponents as someone who, given his military contacts, should have known what he was talking about. So it is interesting to find Hill-Norton writing, in the memorandum which launched the report, that UFOs were "essentially a religious matter" rather than a military threat from outer space, and that furthermore: "There is certainly a degree of psychical involvement in almost every case. Quite often, however, such experiences are definitely antithetical to orthodox Christian belief."
Born in 1915, Inglesby is probably Britains longest serving UFO theorist, with contacts at the highest level both in the church and in the British establishment. Much of what has been written on this subject in the UK emanates from his persistent and meticulous writings, even though most ufologists Ive questioned have never heard of him.
There are persistent reports of military leaders being quite alarmed that there are types of ETs which are indistinguishable [some at all and some without very careful close examination and scanning] from normal humans. There are even concerns on the part of some military types that said human looking ETs have taken over key leadership positions on the global stageeven in the US political bureaucracy and military. This may be true by such critters working their way up with various skids being greased to aid their rise in power along the way. SOME even are concerned that normal human leaders HAVE BEEN REPLACED with cloned critters housing ET/fallen angel mentalities, spirits and the original human then disposed of. Can anyone spell body snatchers?
At the opening of the UFO era in 1947, the ETH was just one of a number of competing theories for the origin of flying saucers. When the very first Gallup poll was carried out in the US, the ETH did not even figure in the results. But when asked "What do you think the saucers are?" one woman responded by "citing a Biblical text
[and] said it was a sign of the worlds end". 5
These were peculiar views, even for a UFO publication. Creighton was following Inglesby in forging a demonological interpretation of ufology, a package that contained some disturbing ingredients such as extreme right wing politics and raging paranoia. During his long editorship, these bizarre views found a home in the very mouthpiece of serious ufology. For a time, anyone who was anyone in the subject read FSR. And, as a result, a number of very well known names were drawn into this web including some of those from Britains largest UFO organisation, BUFORA.
Three former chairmen of BUFORA, including the founding President, Graham Knewstub, along with Capt Ivar Mackay and Roger Stanway, became convinced that UFOs were of demonic origin. Both Knewstub and Stanway were originally believers in nuts-and-bolts spacecraft, but their views changed when their involvement in ufology came into direct conflict with their religious beliefs.
In November 1976, Stanway stunned his friends and colleagues by resigning as chairman and severing all contact with the subject. In his resignation letter of November 1976, he explained that he and his wife had been "born again" as part of a massive Christian revival that was sweeping through the world. He added that: "Furthermore, I now believe that the UFO phenomenon has Satanic origins." You could dismiss Stanway as an isolated example of someone who was pre-inclined to religious fundamentalism but that wouldnt necessarily be true, and he isnt an isolated example.
It amazes me that some Evangelicals seem compelled to insist that theres absolutely NO nuts and bolts craft involved. Why cant it be a BOTH/AND reality? My relative clearly worked around (an observational distance) tangible UFO craft that our black ops sorts of crews built, maintained and flew. Reportedly the critters even helped us build a fleet of such.
Im not denying that some craft may well be materializations of demonic forces etc. etc. etc. There are persistent reports that some of the craft seem to be alive. And, SOME of the shape-shifting phenomena might be more easily explained by an extra-dimensional fallen angel sort of organism than by a bit of technological hardware. However, there is evidently also hardware that can dramatically change shape.
Millican said: "I dont think the thing I saw was mechanical at all. I got the distinct impression that it was alive." He felt the UFO was evil, and made a report of it to the Bishop of Bristol and to the police, who searched the area but drew a blank. 8
In May 1977, a group of priests and former ufologists came together as a result of an advert placed in the The Church Times. In the advert, Eric Inglesby had invited all those who were concerned by the growing public interest in UFOs and aliens to join a new Christian UFO Research Association. Although membership of CHRUFORA never rose above 40, the society had associates from all denominations of the Christian faith. It included ufologists such as Knewstub, Stanway and Pugh and clergy such as Inglesby, Millican and several bishops. The association pledged to fight against what it saw as the rising tide of occultism and to do everything in its power to warn others about the evil influence of flying saucery, which was "fraught with danger for the unwary and riddled with heresy and false belief".
Members also identified a number of other evil elements in the plot. For example, those contacted by the aliens are subject to a form of mind control (demonic possession) that gives them an overwhelming desire to make their way to the Devils Tower. At the climax of the movie, the UFO entities are portrayed as benevolent and angelic, and as all well-informed demonologists know Satans demons are able to disguise themselves as angels of light to deceive world leaders.
Essentially, that signals, to me, that most of whole groups are ripe for the seductions of the fallen angels because said Christians have not functionally and usually have not intellectually ACCEPTED THE WHOLE COUNSEL OF THE WHOLE OF SCRIPTURE about what SHOULD BE NORMATIVE for the Christian life in this Church age. Indeed, some clueless, willfully deaf, dumb and blind folks deny that there even are eras involved in Christianity and history-in-the-making at all.
For them, not only is this NOT any sort of Biblical END TIMES, God quit being God after Pentecost or at least after John ran out of ink at the end of Revelation. What idiocy! Sheesh! They can deny Gods supernatural nature and tendencies and HIS determination to relate to HIS KIDS SUPERNATURALLY ALL THEY WANT. They are merely increasing the chances that they will end up on one side of a crucial line and God will be on the other side.
--asleep
--in denial
--clueless
--playing fogged out mind-games
--fighting over minor details
. . . sigh . . .
In the event, the Queen, along with Prince Philip and Lord Mountbatten both of whom were long-standing flying saucer enthusiasts attended the star-spangled Royal Premiere on 14 March, apparently without any intervention by demonic forces.
So why did the demonic theory of UFOs become such a popular explanation from the late 1960s and early 1970s on? And how many ufologists and, indeed, members of the public, give credence to this idea today? I suspect there may be a link between belief in a demonic origin for UFOs and the wider "occult revival" recognised by the sociologist Marcello Truzzi (see FT208:5859). He categorised the revival into four main areas of popular fascination: Astrology; Satanism and Witchcraft; Parapsychology; and Eastern mysticism. "Flying saucers" appeared only in a fifth waste basket category containing areas which he believed had "small scope and influence or are in an actual state of decline". 10 Much depends on what is meant by "real". For many religious people, the Devil is very much a physical, living reality. Certainly, his evil influence is as real to them as are the Greys to those who believe in alien abductors. Indeed, it seemed that, in the USA at least, belief in the devil had easily overtaken the ETH in the run up to the Millennium. A succession of polls published by the Center for Policy Research found belief in the devil increased from 37 per cent in 1964 to 48 per cent in 1973.11 The latest Gallup poll, in 1995, found this had risen to 65 per cent more than those who believe UFOs are "real"!
I dont doubt that satans crews of whatever variety are involved. However, I believe that sometimes, maybe most of the time, they do use some technologies. Its NOT 100% ALL spiritual forces mumbo jumbo exclusively.
Dr David Clarke lectures on supernatural beliefs and urban legends at Sheffield Universitys Centre for English Cultural Tradition. He is a regular FT contributor and author of The Angel of Mons (2004).
True.
And AMEN TO THAT!
I’ve often achieved similarly, by HIS GRACE AND SPIRIT.
I hope you have been enjoying the quality of my posts.
OF COURSE.
THANKS THANKS!
Appreiate your contributions to dialogue.
Blessings,
“...best-known books promoting the demonic theory of UFOs...”
also, “ALIEN ENCOUNTERS”, by Missler
A good one, alright.
Thx.
What if "Demons from Hell", were, and have always been, Aliens from another planet/dimension? Now that I think of it, would there really be any practical difference?
Based on my understanding of physics - nothing can go faster than the speed of light and even approaching the speed of light makes it impossible to fathom the complexities involved - not to mention the killer inertia levels, etc. - means that it is almost impossible if life exists in outer space it is visiting earth - and even if there is life in space able to t ravel between stars - the odds of them finding earth is just as astronomical.
If - if - if UFO's are real - they have several possible origins - humans from the future visiting the past. Time traveling in theory is much easier to do than traveling between stars.
Or
Beings that live another plane of existence parallel to our own - again with the theory being that breaching the dimensional membrane is easier than traveling between stars.
POST 51
BKMK 4 later reading = bflr
It’s been a while since I read on the subject so my memory may be in error.
IIRC, fallen angels are merely fallen angels and remain as such. But the demons are souls of the Nephilim/Rephriam (et al giants) who were the offspring of the copulation between fallen angels and human women.
Please correct me if I’m in error on this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.