Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spray-on liquid glass is about to revolutionize almost everything
PhysOrg ^ | 2/2/10 | Lin Edwards

Posted on 02/02/2010 7:40:24 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: LibWhacker

ping


41 posted on 02/02/2010 8:46:36 PM PST by freemike (John Adams-Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
With all the claims about this stuff, the pointer on my BS meter is starting to jump around rather wildly.
42 posted on 02/02/2010 8:46:59 PM PST by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Thanks for the ping!


43 posted on 02/02/2010 8:49:53 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher
I wonder if this liquid glass will fill in gouges in windshiels caused by sand and gravel.

Same website, right side of page. They have it for sale.

WINDSHIELD REPAIR

44 posted on 02/02/2010 8:50:57 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

“Glass itself is a liquid”

True, but most people won’t believe it.


45 posted on 02/02/2010 8:51:17 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: krb

Take a 60 year old piece of plate glass and measure it top and bottom and you will find that it has settled over the years with the bottom being thicker.


46 posted on 02/02/2010 8:53:17 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles
I attended an old school as a child that had glass windows that were wavy. It was in the midwest where it gets both hot and cold. Glass is a liquid.
47 posted on 02/02/2010 8:55:14 PM PST by Tucson Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Greeeeeat!

Something ELSE for the muslims to hate us for.


48 posted on 02/02/2010 8:55:21 PM PST by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

There was a show on “paint on” TV screens. I forget how, but electro-sensitive bits were added to a VERY thin film of plastic. The plastic was flexible and still showed the picture. They then spoke of imbedding it into paints and covering entire buildings, walls, etc. with it. So - add it to this spray on glass. (Or cover the building with the electro-paint and THEN cover with the glass).


49 posted on 02/02/2010 8:56:24 PM PST by 21twelve (Having the Democrats in control is like a never-ending game of Calvin ball. (Giotto))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Thommas; AGreatPer

Interesting questions BUMP!


50 posted on 02/02/2010 8:58:44 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Take a 60 year old piece of plate glass and measure it top and bottom and you will find that it has settled over the years with the bottom being thicker.

Nope. That's the urban legend. Check out that link.

In other words, while some antique windowpanes are thicker at the bottom, there are no statistical studies to show that all or most antique windowpanes are thicker at the bottom than at the top. The variations in thickness of antique windowpanes has nothing to do with whether glass is a solid or a liquid; its cause lies in the glass manufacturing process employed at the time, which made the production of glass panes of constant thickness quite difficult.

51 posted on 02/02/2010 8:59:26 PM PST by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
With all the claims about this stuff, the pointer on my BS meter is starting to jump around rather wildly.

Wouldn't it be interesting if this, and many other claims, turn out to be true. If a whole new world of items was coming out of the nanotechnology industry? Maybe even more than just that industry. Maybe in the energy field.

And the world leaders are trying to rake in as much dough as they can before it all hits?

52 posted on 02/02/2010 9:02:56 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Perhaps this is a byproduct of cold fusion? Same level of hype. Maybe there’ll be something to it, but ingesting it concerns me.


53 posted on 02/02/2010 9:03:09 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe the next Bond mobile will go green and spray liquid glass instead of oil.
Slippery when dry.


54 posted on 02/02/2010 9:04:12 PM PST by Waverunner ( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed; libh8er

“Glass itself is a liquid”

So is a popsicle.


55 posted on 02/02/2010 9:04:57 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hah! I know what you’re thinking, but Mom sez yer still gonna haveta take a bath. Nice try. BTT.


56 posted on 02/02/2010 9:05:14 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucson Jim
Glass is a liquid.

Yes, it is. But, at room temperature, it's damn near frozen solid.

57 posted on 02/02/2010 9:10:52 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Please explain?


58 posted on 02/02/2010 9:12:29 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This world will have a serious GOI problem if this product actually hits the market.

/semiconductor humor

(who gets this joke?)


59 posted on 02/02/2010 9:13:41 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

That’s the problem I have with the ASTM test. Apparently, they define a liquid as having flow at 100F. Water would pass as a liquid at 100F, but fail as a liquid if the test were run above 130F or below 32F. The temp chosen for determination of a liquid seems arbitrary.


60 posted on 02/02/2010 9:16:34 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson