Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ALWAYS: So-Called "Pro-Life Dems" Cave In to "Pro-Abortion" Dems
March 21, 2010

Posted on 03/21/2010 2:24:16 PM PDT by Steelfish

While Andy McCarthy at NRO calls the EO "blatant chicanery" I think Stupak and his Gang of 12 were a gigantic fraud to begin with. Both Pelosi and the Pro-Abort Dems gave him the middle finger when he tried to add to the Reconciliation Fix the earlier Pro-Life language passed by the House. With nowhere to go, rather than sticking to principle as did the Pro-Abort Dems, he searched for a convenient "fig-leaf" exit. This is why he and his disreputable gang are a bunch of frauds.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: 111th; abortion; bhohealthcare; deathpanels; obamacare; plannedparenthood; prolifedems; stemexpress; vanity; zerocare

1 posted on 03/21/2010 2:24:16 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

THERE ARE NO PRO LIFE DEMOCRATS....THEY WOULD NOT BE DEMOCRATS IF THEY WERE PRO LIFE.


2 posted on 03/21/2010 2:27:15 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If a Dem were truly pro-life he or she would not be a Dem.


3 posted on 03/21/2010 2:29:27 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
It is now manifested for all to see that there really is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat. I hope that we can abort them from office in the next election.
4 posted on 03/21/2010 2:30:17 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

So, how safe are these folks in their seats? If you want to repeal this and make sure it never comes back, there has to be a price paid by those who vote yes.


5 posted on 03/21/2010 2:31:23 PM PDT by lawnguy (The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

If they were pro life they wouldnt keep Pelosi in power. On the Senate side Reid is not quite as bad but it is the same deal. And of course some of them lie thru their teeth to get elected, like Sen. Tester of MT.


6 posted on 03/21/2010 2:36:10 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Perhaps because a “pro-life” Dem is an oxymoron.


7 posted on 03/21/2010 2:38:28 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
At the end of the day they are still Dems..


8 posted on 03/21/2010 2:43:22 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Stupak is either a retard (can I say that here??) or a phony.My money’s on phony because nobody could be *that* stupid to believe that an “Executive Order” in this situation...particularly one signed (or promised) by Hussein....would stop abortions for even 5 minutes.


9 posted on 03/21/2010 3:09:59 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

Pro-Life Democrat=Pro-Jew Nazi


10 posted on 03/21/2010 3:23:26 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

awww come on ...I dont think Jew has anything to do with this...they just like getting screwed it seems....starting with jimmy carter.


11 posted on 03/21/2010 3:26:43 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Stupak is a politician. That class is mostly narcissistic, opportunistic and amoral. Stupak accomplished what he wanted which was to draw attention to himself.
12 posted on 03/21/2010 4:11:52 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

I don’t think you got my point, which was: There is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat, just as there is no such thing as a pro-Jew Nazi.

To see Stupak arguing against the Stupak amendment, and then start spouting Seamless Garment rhetoric, claiming the Democrats are the “real” pro-lifers—it was obvious where his real loyalties are—with the Democratic Party. He is not and never has been pro-life. He was always an impostor—a Democrat who knew he could fool lots of his constituents.


13 posted on 03/21/2010 10:25:03 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

sory my argument is the same as yours....


14 posted on 03/22/2010 3:46:23 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Note: this topic is from 3/21/2010. Thanks Steelfish.

15 posted on 10/12/2015 12:00:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson