"Does the size matter when it is not erect? I am just sayin."
Posted on 05/07/2010 9:27:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
Do Not Mock Your Co-Worker's Tiny Penis While Testing Full-Body Scanners
By Laura Northrup on May 7, 2010 11:10 AM
If you've been wondering how much of your body airport full-body scanners actually do reveal, a recent TSA training session in Miami shows the answer: enough for your co-workers to mock the size of your genitals. The target of the mockery eventually found it unbearable, and police say that he "could not take the jokes anymore and lost his mind," attacking one of his colleagues in the parking lot. He was arrested for aggravated battery.
From the police report:
"The investigation revealed that the [suspect] was upset after a training with "Whole Body Image" machine. The X-Ray revealed [the suspect] has a small penis and co-workers made fun of him on a daily basis. [He] stated he could not take the jokes anymore and lost his mind. ”
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0506101tsa2.html
I wonder who had the biggest baton?
Ponys?
I’m a grower, not a shower.
Does the size matter when it is not erect? I am just sayin.
Those scanners are stupid. There is no reason for those things to show peoples’ bodies.
This is why I will never fly. My son will not go through those machines. That’s kiddy porn.
I used to work in a VA hospital, and I can tell you that the unerect size has NOTHING to do with what it looks like later. Some guys just retract like cat claws. This is probably a good thing for the survival of the species.
On the other hand, there are guys who really don’t have anything going on no matter what.
"Does the size matter when it is not erect? I am just sayin."
Well, if you are a terrorist packing a penis bomb...
I guess we need Barny Frank to check hung scanner pics for reality...
I suppose I should state that I’m a female so my fear of those machines has nothing to do with size. My fear is that there are going to be perverts trying to get these jobs. Also, body scanners are not the way to fix the problem.
Personally, BOTH of them need to be fired. The supervisor should have been more professional, and the guy who had to put up his monster truck/Corvette to bail himself out, well...
“I was in the pool!”
TSA: The new Post Office.
When job training includes revealing the size of a man's penis it's a true sign of just how sick our society has become. This guy ought to file a law suit against the government for forcing him to endure this gross intrusion into his privacy, and for being forced to endure daily ridicule by fellow gummint workers. What's wrong with using a manaquin or other substitute for this X-ray training? Somebody needs to pay and pay dearly for this disgusting turn of events.
Rosie
THE WATER WAS COLD!!!! :D
Then there’s SHRINKAGE ....!!
Quartermaster Clerk: [Returns Austin's personal effects after the reanimation process] One Swedish-made penis enlarger pump.
Austin: [To Vanessa, frantically] That's not mine.
Clerk: One credit card receipt for Swedish-made penis enlarger, signed by Austin Powers.
Austin: I'm telling ya baby, that's not mine!
Clerk: [Beginning to get annoyed over the monotony] One warranty card for Swedish-made penis enlarger pump, filled out by Austin Powers.
Austin: I don't even know what this is! This sort of thing ain't my bag, baby!
Clerk: One book, "Swedish-Made Penis Enlarger Pumps and Me: (This Sort of Thing Is My Bag, Baby)", by Austin Powers.
Austin: [Gaping] Ah.
Clerk: Just sign the form.
(Warning: Outrageous Fortune movie reference, foul language advisory)
If these full body scanners can display detail like that, someone please explain to me why you would want to send your Wife through them, or your 14 year old daughter or son. I don’t care what extra level of security they provide - there is a line of personal privacy we should never cross.
AAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
MY EYES...............MY EYES!
Was his name George??
We rock stars are packin’ armadillos in our trousers.
Someone suggested that a harassment suit might be brought
against this guy’s colleagues ... maybe not a bad idea. Might improve the level of professionalism.
Long term, these porn boxes need to go away. This proves that they are more revealing than we are supposed to realize.
Is that real or a stick of dynamite??
I have a serious question. How much can these scanners see? For instance, if someone swallows drug balloons or inserts something in a body cavity, will these machines pick them up?
Apparently they can’t pick up material inside the body. From the Boston Globe:
“Apparently they can’t pick up material inside the body. From the Boston Globe:”
All of which makes this just as effective as giving granny a cavity search...I hate these stupid bstrds in power.
I have serious reservations about flying to Chicago to see my father, about subjecting my son and daughter to this.
“I have serious reservations about flying to Chicago to see my father, about subjecting my son and daughter to this.”
I put it on a par with going to Mexico...
Lemmetellya: If I were on that jury, this guy is NOT GUILTY. If they razzed him once and he asked them to stop, and then they kept it up anyway, they deserved a beat down. Fightin’ words...
No. It does not penetrate beyond the skin.
A bomb slightly larger than a white-out bottle can take out a plane and can easily be hidden, ahem, "under" the skin.
The difficulty of obtaining plastic explosives has prevented more bombings than the scanners ever will. Even so, I suspect these types of bombings have happened far more often than officials are willing to admit.
Sign next to the x-ray screen:
“Thou shalt not giggle”
NO!
Better to have a little weiner than be like obammy and have no weiner, nor balls.
Thanks for clearing that up. I had been hearing things such as how it will pick up breast implants, prosthetics and things of that nature.
I’d rather get “scanned” than fall out of the air. Just sayin’.
Some of us would proudly walk thorugh the scanner any time (if you catch my drift *wink*)
“forcing him to endure this gross intrusion into his privacy”
You have a point. OTOH if government expects the sheeple to endure the identical gross intrusion into privacy, then it seems a bit hypocritical not to permit the same on its employees.
Put a different way: if the government recognized this to be a gross intrusion of privacy and for that reason exempted its employees from the indignity, it effectively has conceded that the sheeple are right to be upset at the use of such intrusive technology.
Conversely, by subjecting its employees to the same procedure, the government is signaling that the technology is no big deal.
Thus while I concur with other posters that using this technology is not necessary or even particularly effective, I’d rather the government be at least consistent in its positions rather than knowingly subjecting the sheeple to a procedure so odious that it exempts its own employees.
BtD: "Why, thank you, Mr. TSA Guy! To what do I owe the pleasure?"
TSA Guy: "Pity, sir."
I used to know a guy who was hung like a mouse...his wife put it charitably: “It’s not the size of the wand, it’s the magic in it”...
If you really want to hurt your eyes, go check out the Chaz Bono sex change threads...
It's probably more like this, which is disturbing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
