Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Eisenhower Defends A "Traitor?"
Old Virginia Blog ^ | 05/11/2010 | Richard Williams

Posted on 05/12/2010 11:50:16 AM PDT by Davy Buck

"General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America. . ."

(Excerpt) Read more at oldvirginiablog.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Education; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: confederacy; dixie; eisenhower; military; patriotism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: iowamark
Robert E. Lee was always opposed to slavery and freed his slaves long before the war.

Lee had no real problems with slavery and didn't free his slaves until December 1862. Let's not make the man out to be something he isn't; he's a human, not a deity. Lee was faced with a difficult decision. Lee took the only course he felt his honor allowed him. While I may not agree with it, and while by a strict interpretation of the Constitution his actions may have constituted treason, I am certainly not going to condemn him for it. The average man, upon reaching the crossroads in life, often does not take the right path if he feels it's too hard. Lee took that path regardless of the consequences because he felt it was the only thing his integrity allowed. I respect him for that, and recognize that he paid a tremendous price for his decision.

41 posted on 05/12/2010 12:26:07 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
No... I think we can all agree that you would benefit from a better education on the subject.

Actually you should of limited your answer to the question rather then engage in such a transparently childish attempt at topic diversion.

Your response not only proved you don't really believe your "Crusade" argument but also indicated you pretensions to intellectual credibility on this topic are a grotesque fraud.

By saying NO you then agree that Secession was an illegitimate response to the results of the 1860 elections.

BTW, I have a BA in History. So from the point of view of Education, I have a much better grasp of the facts on this topic then you.

42 posted on 05/12/2010 12:26:19 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
I think I might ask for a Confederate Caucus where no controversy is allowed!

43 posted on 05/12/2010 12:27:03 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: carton253
Agreed.

Grant one said that No worse cause in history was ever served by better men.

44 posted on 05/12/2010 12:27:53 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Robert Duvall - amazing as the old man in a cameo in The Road based in the Cormc McCarthy novel.

His best performance ever?


45 posted on 05/12/2010 12:28:47 PM PDT by eleni121 (For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
A BA in History?? Write when you find work!

46 posted on 05/12/2010 12:28:48 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: carton253

LOL...I think we need to post the picture of the Civilty War FAIL BOAT (The one lying over on its side...)

I generally don’t get involved with Civil War threads for just that reason, but I have always felt that Lee made a tough choice, a very tough choice, and he lived the rest of his life facing it.

As someone who has been lucky enough in life never to have had to make a decision like that one, I respect those who do. I think he made the harder choice, one that he probably knew was not going to go well in the end, but by gosh, he made it. Could I make that decision? I guess I will only know if it comes up. I would like to say I could, but...how does one ever know?


47 posted on 05/12/2010 12:29:36 PM PDT by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Interesting...I wrote my post at #47 before I saw yours.

I agree. He WAS a human.


48 posted on 05/12/2010 12:31:17 PM PDT by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

HAAAA Damn now that is funny!

Yes, I do not work in the field being far too over on the right politically to be tolerated by the Historian’s guild


49 posted on 05/12/2010 12:34:41 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I LOVED him as Josha Chamberlain. What a great man, too. (Chamberlain)

I think Washington had to have someone playing it with a HUGE amount of stature and...should I say it (because I HATE the word)...gravitas.

I kept wanting to giggle every time I saw his face, but I give him points for doing a yeoman job.


50 posted on 05/12/2010 12:37:56 PM PDT by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Sorry but that is pure BS.

Slavery was the diving issue for the leaders of the Southern Secessionist movement.

It was not the only issue but it was the key issue in the US Civil War.

Without the divisive issue of slavery dividing the politics north and south all the other issues would of been resolved via political consensus and comprise. Only the issue of Slavery was the “irreconcilable issue” that dived North and South

51 posted on 05/12/2010 12:42:34 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

This is, so far, about as gentle a civil war thread as I have seen.

Why, no one has yet praised the skulking coward who came up behind Lincoln and shot him with a little girl’s gun, for example.


52 posted on 05/12/2010 12:49:34 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Great question. And no Southerner would have made a statement like he made. The ability to secede from the Union was NOT a revolution, it was and still is a part of the Constitution. We, as citizens can rebel against a tyrannical government. The problem for the South was that the North beat them. There was never a settling of the concept of states seceding.


53 posted on 05/12/2010 12:51:01 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Agree. Totally. And we should do it again before the progressive progress us into an historical asterisk.


54 posted on 05/12/2010 12:52:15 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
The only problem with his (Daniels's) portrayal of Chamberlain is that the movies were chronologically reversed...The real Chamberlain made a huge transition from academic to officer, and had to grow quickly into his role as a combat leader. Daniels obviously grew into the role, between the movies, and was a better "Chamberlain the Officer" in the prequel, than he was in Gettysburg. It just made it seem to me that the "novice soldier" Chamberlain in G&G was a more confidant, assertive personality than the seasoned, battle hardened Chamberlain he portrayed in Gettysburg.

BTW, I agree about Neeson as Washington; it would be a close to perfect fit.

55 posted on 05/12/2010 12:52:22 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Yup, almost as much fun as debates about the Slaveholder’s Rebellion.

Oh, wait. It’s the same thing.


56 posted on 05/12/2010 12:53:45 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dmz
That's because he's busy on another thread at the moment...
57 posted on 05/12/2010 12:54:58 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Burned out the Bonus Marchers camped on the Mall, under Macarther’s direction. Didn’t have problem shooting at WWI veterans who were starving and trying to get the bonus guarenteed to them by Hoover and FDR. FDR never paid them.


58 posted on 05/12/2010 12:55:29 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
The man helped to lead an armed revolution against the United States of America. Whatever his other qualities, I find that hard to respect. And yes I am a Southerner.

Absolutely untrue. He led an army that fought Yankee aggression. He fought in defense of the South's right to secede. He had no interest in revolting against the government of the US and neither did the South. They wanted seperation from the Union...not control over it. And t5hey were well within their rights to secede. lincoln's response was to trample the Constitution and wage war on the PEOPLE of the South.

59 posted on 05/12/2010 12:57:58 PM PDT by pgkdan (I Miss Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

He didn’t ‘lead’ the Confederacy. At best he was a reluctant defender.

Lincoln himself insisted that he lead the Union Army. The only reason he did not, is because the legislature of Virginia voted in favour of secession.

Lee could have done as others did, and leave the Confederacy, but he chose to defend his state. I can’t fault him.


60 posted on 05/12/2010 1:01:52 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson