Posted on 09/28/2010 7:26:28 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Europe is doing “so well” with the success of it’s carbon trading that some people there have given up wait for the rest of us to join them voluntarily and decided to try threats and intimidation.
It’s another lesson in why trading schemes are so dog-messy to unravel once they are in place.
We here in the land of the long-distance-haul-to-everywhere find the idea of taxing carbon emissions on flights especially appealling. Just marvellous for our tourism and business after all. And what are the odds that our Gullible Gillard-and-Greens Government will fight in the WTO to save Australia from this effective tariff on doing business here?
Benny Pieser spotted the article in a German publication.
22 September 2010
Thomas Ludwig
Foreign airlines are threatened with a flight and landing ban from 2012 in the European Union if they do not participate in emissions trading.
The ban is proposed in an internal document by the EU Commission seen by Handelsblatt. Summarised on nine pages, the guidelines describe how such a ban could be implement. The Commission considers a flight and landing ban as a last resort to make the airlines surrender over its Emissions Trading Scheme.
An EU Directive stipulates that airlines from Europe and third countries are mandated to be included in the trading of emissions rights. On their flights to and from Europe, they may then only emit as much CO2 as the CO2 certificates they hold. 85 percent of the certificates are free of charge while 15 percent of the allowances have to bought via auctions.
“The whole project has not been thought through. The EU cannot impose its law on third countries,” Holger Krahmer, environmental spokesman for the German Liberal Party in the EU Parliament told Handelsblatt.
In fact, international resistance against the EU plan is growing. Several American, Asian and African airlines are suing the EU over its emissions trade project. The US Aviation Association ATA is attempting to have the policy suspended by the European Court of Justice. And the Russian government has also voiced its displeasure in Brussels.
Not even critics of the project believe that the European Commission will actually ban flights by American and other foreign airlines. “They will use it as leverage, and accept compensation measures,” estimates Liberal MEP Holger Krahmer. The EU Commission is looking for a face-saving way out: “What remains are the costs of CO2 allowances, which will only burden European airlines and make them uncompetitive” Airlines such as Lufthansa and Air Berlin had already warned of this danger in the legislative process.
“The EU has once again overestimated itself,” said Krahmer. “The project was not thought through. The EU cannot impose its legal authority on third countries.”
At the end of September, the general assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) will take place. Some countries, such as the U.S. want to adopt a resolution, which will make clear that emissions trading systems may only be applied by mutual agreement.
“Greenhouse gas emissions have increased dramatically, particularly in air traffic,” said Social Democrat MEP Matthias Groote. The climate expert warns against granting exemptions to noncompliant airlines from third countries. “If the U.S. and other countries try to suspend the EU emissions trading regime for third countries, it would lead to a huge distortion of competition for European airspace.” It is more important than ever to integrate international aviation into the EU’s emissions trading system. After all, the emissions of greenhouse gases in air traffic have doubled in the past two decades.
The EU Directive, which includes aviation in emissions trading, is part of a package of regulations with which the EU wants to meet its climate protection goals. Emissions of greenhouse gases should fall by a fifth by 2020 under the 1990 level […]
The inclusion of aviation in the Emissions Trading Scheme will impact consumers too. According to calculations by the EU Commission, a ticket for a return flight within the EU could become more expensive by up to nine Euros because of emissions trading. For long-haul flights, larger price increases can be expected, a return ticket to New York could be up to 40 Euros more expensive. [transl. Philipp Mueller]
Handelsblatt, 22 September 2010
Thanks to Benny Pieser http://www.thegwpf.org
There goes the tourism industry.
fyi
Goodbye Europe.
Sounds like some of the “emissions traders” aren’t making as much dinero as they were expecting to make.
Let ‘em. Watch their (even more than the US) socialist economies further crumble. I for one could not care less.
if they do not participate in emissions tradingHuh. I guess that rules out vacations in Europe for me. :') Until the Euros wise up and execute the criminals who dream up such policies, they'll accelerate their decline into Shariah Europe. Thanks Ernest.
Only to and from Europe.
*snkr!*
The Euroweenies can play paddycake with the sandmaggots.
Question:
What would be the impact on EU economy if no air flights where made to or from EU for one (1) week?
If they do we should make it illegal to import anything from them or export anything to them!!!!
Isolate the bastards!!!!
This is just a back door to protect european airlines.
IOW THIS IS TRADE WAR.
The EU is in protectionism.
Obama’s administration is to commie to get it.
Then as good global citizens and wise stewards of the earth, all Americans should boycott European travel.
In the interest of reducing carbon emissions, of course.
This is just another effort to subdue us.
On the other hand, it could be a good thing for them. The fastest way to break a thought down is to vote it in.
We need to remember that the EU is a over size law firm of Europe countries. There is a point of voting and they could end up losing members if too costly.
If they fail, it would be in our favor. Domino affect.
Thanks for the Post.
Paul
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
