Skip to comments.
Can Firefox Be Saved? Two Proposals
Datamation ^
| 4 April 2011
| Serdar Yegulalp
Posted on 04/05/2011 5:06:36 AM PDT by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
1
posted on
04/05/2011 5:06:40 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
2
posted on
04/05/2011 5:07:31 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: ShadowAce
I loaded up Firefox 4 a couple of days ago. A much superior product. Seems to handle the various flash conflicts better than the 3.xx version.
Definitely faster to load. I’m impressed.
4
posted on
04/05/2011 5:12:11 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
I have yet to investigate it. I keep hearing conflicting reports.
5
posted on
04/05/2011 5:17:25 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
This guy sounds exactly like someone who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
6
posted on
04/05/2011 5:20:50 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
LOL! As I mentioned above, I haven’t tried it yet. What’s he got wrong?
7
posted on
04/05/2011 5:22:44 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I am not happy at all with 4. The performance is far worse than previous and it is buggy. Caret browsing, for example, keeps toggling keeping me from being able to use pg up and pg down when browsing (among other things). I have caught myself going back to IE.
8
posted on
04/05/2011 5:27:38 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: ShadowAce
I have no idea....I'm been slapping 4 on machine after machine and have yet to have a problem with anything other than 3rd party Add Ons that haven't been updated, yet.
I'm guessing that being a "Tech Writer" his machine is junked up with early release software he's played with, and that's creating problems.
Considering AdBlock Plus and Flash Block, there's really no reason to use any other browser.
9
posted on
04/05/2011 5:31:15 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
To: mnehring
The performance is far worse than previous and it is buggy. I've heard this, but I've also heard the performance is better.
What platform/configuration are you using?
10
posted on
04/05/2011 5:31:46 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Considering AdBlock Plus and Flash Block, there's really no reason to use any other browser. That's been my experience as well with Firefox since the days of Firebird.
Thanks for your input.
11
posted on
04/05/2011 5:33:29 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Windows 7, I don’t have any special add-ons running in the background other than the usual Flash. Something else I just noticed. It doesn’t seem to like Adobe Acrobat Pro. In other browsers, if you click a .pdf link, it will open in Acrobat Pro. With version 4, it doesn’t recognize Pro as a replacement for Adobe Reader and just gives an error message.
12
posted on
04/05/2011 5:35:46 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: ShadowAce
I loaded it a month ago and have not had even one problem.
13
posted on
04/05/2011 5:39:24 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: ShadowAce
I went to 4 last week from 3.6 and have been quite happy with it. The old version had become buggy and was crashing. I haven’t had any problems at all with 4. I like Firefox for the addons that keep out the junk. Haven’t tried Chrome.
14
posted on
04/05/2011 5:40:11 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
To: ShadowAce
I was very dubious, as I’m running a ten-year old installation of XP with limited hard drive space (there’s never enough).
Performance has definitely improved. I’ll probably put it on my laptop this week.
15
posted on
04/05/2011 5:43:00 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Second Amendment First; DManA; mnehring
Thanks guys. A couple more positive reviews for 4.
Since I don't run Win7, I may go ahead and try it out.
16
posted on
04/05/2011 5:43:39 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: mnehring
I finally gave up on Adobe; too bloated and too many problems. I’m using PDF-XChange Viewer and am very happy with it.
17
posted on
04/05/2011 5:44:14 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Considering AdBlock Plus and Flash Block, there's really no reason to use any other browser.I have more for you in a moment. But I am on 4 and it is slick IMHO.
I will do anything to stay away from anything Google given their relationship with "The One". No Crome, no-GMail, but I still looking for a better search engine, maybe Screwgle (spelled correct?) just to piss Google off.
Other Add-Ons....
* BetterPrivacy ( a must, "LSO's" are bad)
* Cooliris ( ah so so...)
* FasterFox Lite ( makes it faster)
* Ghostery (a must, stop them tracking for marketing purposes)
* NoScript (again like Ghostery, a must )
* PDF dowload (neat)
* Startup.Service 0.2 ( opens Firefox Faster)
* Vacuum Places ( cleans up sqlite files, increase speed )
* Tweak Network (maybe redundant w/ FasterFox, but try it...)
* Morning Coffee ( for your regular surfs, I have it off @ the moment, it's ok...)
18
posted on
04/05/2011 5:46:32 AM PDT
by
taildragger
(( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: mnehring
I am not happy at all with 4. The performance is far worse than previous
I disagree 100%. I started using FF4 Beta 6 right through FF4 RC and I saw an incredible increase in performance.
In fact, installing the beta versions never overwrote the old version (3.6?), and comparing the two was easy.
The only "bug" I found in the beta versions was a loss of some bookmarks which were easily retrieved and reloaded.
19
posted on
04/05/2011 5:47:51 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: taildragger
Agree about NoScript and Ghostery as a must. I’ll have to try some of the others you mention. Thanks.
20
posted on
04/05/2011 5:50:17 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson