Posted on 05/12/2011 11:32:43 AM PDT by decimon
Interactive teaching methods significantly improved attendance and doubled both engagement and learning in a large physics class, according to a University of British Columbia study published today in Science.
Led by Louis Deslauriers, a post-doctoral researcher at UBC's Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI), the study compared the amount of learning students experienced when taught – in three hours over one week – by traditional lecture and by using interactive activities based on research in cognitive psychology and physics education.
The research team found that students in the interactive class were nearly twice as engaged as their counterparts in the traditional class. Students from the experimental class uniformly scored nearly twice as well in a test designed to determine their grasp of complex physics concepts (average score 74 per cent vs. 41 per cent, with random guessing producing a score of 23 per cent). Attendance in the interactive class also increased by 20 per cent during the experiment.
"There is overwhelming evidence how much teaching pedagogy based on cognitive psychology and education research can improve science education," says co-author Carl Wieman. "This study further shows that we can achieve individual attention without individual interaction, and that even in a large class, the positive effects of a tutor or apprenticeship model can be achieved by using evidence-based teaching methods."
Wieman is Associate Director for Science of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. He was involved with the study last year before going on leave from UBC and the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU).
"In addition to the objective measurements of engagement, attendance and test scores, we also surveyed students and found that these teaching methods generated a lot of excitement in class – which makes for a great learning environment," says Deslauriers, lead author of the study.
In the study, two classes of an undergraduate physics course with approximately 270 students each were taught by highly-rated, professors with decades of experience. In the second-to-last week of the second semester, the instructor of one of the classes was replaced by Deslauriers and Ellen Schelew, a master's student in the Department of Physics at UBC. Deslauriers and Schelew had been trained by Wieman and other CWSEI researchers in interactive, evidence-based teaching methods but otherwise had little teaching experience beyond serving as teaching assistants.
During the experimental week, Deslauriers and Schelew gave no formal lecturing but guided students through a series of activities that had previously been shown to enhance learning, such as paired and small-group discussions and active learning tasks, which included the use of remote-control "clickers" to provide feedback for in-class questions. Pre-class reading assignments and quizzes were also given to ensure students were prepared to discuss course material upon arrival in class.
"These activities require more work from the students, but the students report that they feel they are learning more and are more vested in their own learning," says co-author Schelew.
"This study is designed specifically to gauge the impact of interactive teaching methods in a large undergraduate physics class, and the results present a very 'clean' comparison to the traditional lecture method," says Wieman.
###
Since 2007, more than 20,000 UBC students have been affected by the CWSEI through the transformation of courses. More than 50 courses in seven departments in the Faculty of Science are undergoing or have finished transformation. The work has attracted international attention and support, including a $2-million gift from Google's founding investor and UBC alumnus David Cheriton in 2010. For more information on the CWSEI, visit http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/.
At the University of Colorado at Boulder, the Science Education Initiative (CU-SEI) has helped incorporate research-based teaching practices into more than 55 courses in five science departments. For more information on CU-SEI, visit http://www.colorado.edu/sei/.
NB: Photographs of Carl Wieman, clickers and students using clickers are available at http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/?p=22347. Videos of CU students using clickers are available at http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/SEI_video.html.
Pay attention ping.
Gee, this has been one of the core principles of the online and face-to-face courses at the school where I teach for over 10 years. It works very well when done correctly. When coupled with hands-on work wherever possible it works even better. These guys are a little late to the game.
It’s sort of like chemistry, even though I never took chemistry, that when students have the chance to do neat stuff in a lab, they’ll show up for it.
Maybe the fact that universities are just now catching on is why higher education is in such a sad state.
we are taught one way for 12 years and then are expected to learn in a completely different and, in my opinion worse, way overnight. Usually by professor's who do not have the most basic understanding of classroom management or human developmental psychology.
Is there anyone that didn't know that? Anyone? ... Anyone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.