Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Well if it really has made those impressive improvements, I may just have to check it out....
1 posted on 06/22/2011 6:26:25 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 06/22/2011 6:27:05 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I love and use Firefox but they took a giant step backwards with FF4 and its slow-movin’ interface.

Perhaps the ‘speed’ of FF5 is simply a return to the status quo under FF3.X?


3 posted on 06/22/2011 6:30:59 AM PDT by relictele (Pax Quaeritur Bello)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

huh...I just updated my Firefox to 3.6.18 this afternoon.

I appear to be somewhat behind the techno curve.


4 posted on 06/22/2011 6:31:05 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

You’re not alone...


5 posted on 06/22/2011 6:33:24 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I hope the hype proves true because Firefox definitely has room for improvement. Have used it for years, since it was Firebird, primarily because I like many of its features, but have almost left it for Chrome several times dues to slow loading and excessive stalls, freezes and it rarely closes cleanly (all those program is not responding messages before closing).


6 posted on 06/22/2011 6:35:23 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I just clicked [Help]->[About] in Firefox
and it started downloading FF5... 8.4MB
Now I’m running it....seems OK so far.


9 posted on 06/22/2011 6:39:13 AM PDT by Bobalu ( "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." ..Moshe Dayan:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Interesting. I just quit using FF4 because it was terrible. I’m back on IE 9 for now until something more stable comes around.

I loved FF3. I should never have moved to FF4.


11 posted on 06/22/2011 6:43:24 AM PDT by Azeem (The world will look up and shout "Save us!"... And I'll whisper "No.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I installed the 32-bit Linux version just a few minutes ago. Not a great deal of difference to me yet. We’ll see how it handles daily browsing over the next week or so. I wish Mozilla put out an official 64-bit version.


12 posted on 06/22/2011 6:43:30 AM PDT by zeugma (The only thing in the social security trust fund is your children and grandchildren's sweat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I wonder why they didn’t compare it to IE9? IE9 claims to be way faster than those listed. I wish to see if another study proved IE9 was faster as well.

But yeah, I think we all know Chrome sucks :-)


16 posted on 06/22/2011 6:54:12 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I upgraded to FF 5.0 this morning and see a noticeable improvement in page load speed over the prior version (4.0.1).


17 posted on 06/22/2011 6:57:38 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Can someone reccommend any good add-ons for FF -

I have added - Ghostery and Better Privacy


18 posted on 06/22/2011 6:58:14 AM PDT by Dacula (Just say no to Vidalia onions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Upgraded to 5.0: seems faster starting up and loading pages, but it disabled a bunch of add-ons, even more than usual for Firefox upgrades. Compatible add-on versions usually, but not always are available later.

Will have to see how it holds up after several hours of browsing.


20 posted on 06/22/2011 7:05:49 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

downloaded it yesterday. Can see no real change

*and no real problems - which is very good

thanks for ping


23 posted on 06/22/2011 7:14:57 AM PDT by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is... tell your storm how BIG your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

If it’s anything like previous major releases, the memory leaks will be twice as bad and it’ll hog 100% of CPU as it reaches 2 gigabytes memory usage after browsing for 15 minutes.


36 posted on 06/22/2011 7:56:17 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 21stCenturion

...


56 posted on 06/22/2011 10:50:05 AM PDT by 21stCenturion ("It's the Judges, Stupid !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

After being open for five or six hours and used intermittently, Firefox 5.0 locked up on me and it took the usual many attempts to close it,”Program not respondng” and several attempts in Windows Task Manager.

Some improvements, but that part isn’t corrected.


66 posted on 06/22/2011 1:09:58 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Placemark.


72 posted on 06/22/2011 9:28:28 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson