Posted on 08/22/2011 12:54:52 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Disgusted by late night text messages, embarrassing blow-offs, and never receiving the phone call you were promised? Leading dating site Chemistry.com has a list of the top ten cities full of romantic, expressive, “high estrogen” men who probably wouldn’t slip into cad territory.
Though bursting with government employees, politicians, political journalists, and all things polarizing and serious, Washington, D.C. is tenth on the list, nine spots below perpetually romantic San Francisco.
Asked how bureaucratic, soulless Washington ever earned a spot on a list of romantic cities, Chemistry.com’s Dr. Helen Fisher told The Daily Caller that D.C. draws a lot of sensitive men who are concerned about the state of the world.
“Washington is, I suppose, a little bit surprising,” the anthropologist told TheDC, adding that 10 million people were surveyed for the list. “Except, an awful lot of [educated] people wind up in Washington, I think. And, I think a lot of the not-for-profits pull in a lot of the high-estrogen types who really sort of care about the state of the planet and the state of the polar bears and the state of the United States. So I’m not surprised that Washington does attract men who are sort of the big, broad, long-view thinkers who are good with verbal and people skills. I think Washington is a town that thrives on that. Along with that, they tend to be more romantic.”
Keeping with the Washington theme, Fisher said former president Bill Clinton is a high-estrogen, emotionally aware person.
“I think that Bill Clinton is a good example of a high-estrogen man,” Fisher explained. I mean, he cried at his daughter’s wedding. His wife didn’t.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Explains a lot. What a bunch of weasels.
Translation: Fagots.
Yep. Faggots, even. You stole my post.
I think that Bill Clinton is a good example of a high-estrogen man,” Fisher explained. I mean, he cried at his daughter’s wedding.
__________________________________________
He also cried when Ron Brown died
But only when the camera was pointed his way...
I dont think “sensitivity” equals estrogen
This reads like satire, but I know that it is real as I have seen it first hand.
“I think that Bill Clinton is a good example of a high-estrogen man,” Fisher explained. I mean, he cried at his daughter’s wedding. His wife didn’t.
______________________________
Yes, doctor. I mean, what’s not romantic about a guy who cheats on his wife 1000 times, plays “cigars” with his intern, and forces himself upon at least 3 other women? What’s not to like?
Pretty.
;o)
Always afraid to stand up for themselves and expected someone else to protect their sorry asses.
Typical for wimp ass liberals/socialists/gays/etc/etc/etc
Probably the coke talking...
Problem is, they are all homosexual.
Fixed.
I have a hairy chest. I am aggressive. I am tall broad shouldered with high density muscle. I have a very strong libido. All this is associated with high testosterone.
But I buy flowers, pay for dinner, write notes, say nice things, I listen, I ask questions, I massage, I comfort, I cuddle.
Women like those things.
Women also like “romance” to include being picked up as if she weighed nothing, thrown around artfully on the bed, and the occasional vulgar display of masculinity and/or virility.
Masculine high testosterone men are plenty romantic.
Somewhat related to politics and sex and who is better in bed, Democrat men or Republican men.......
http://www.gq.com/news-politics/mens-lives/200603/republicans-in-bed-best
Equating ‘high-estrogene’ men, Bill Clinton and ‘probably won’t slip into cad territory’. Proves this article is just plain BS.
This article brings to mind all of those Monty Python “poufter” sketches...
“Keeping with the Washington theme, Fisher said former president Bill Clinton is a high-estrogen, emotionally aware person.”
One thing about Clinton I can say is that I never though of him as a girly man, just a liar.
Now Gore, Edwards, and Obama... different story.
Yeah, pussies have a proclivity for the safe, non-demanding and coercively protective power of government work.
And another bad bit is that most of them around here are clueless liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.