Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Flame on, kick me out, etc. I'm still about the most conservative citizen around and I can take it.
1 posted on 11/23/2011 7:42:47 AM PST by CincyRichieRich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: CincyRichieRich

2 posted on 11/23/2011 7:45:56 AM PST by TSgt ("Romney" means "rino cult" in Kenyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

—Again, there is no salient argument for not voting against Obama if Romney is the nominee.—

Actually there is: If Obama wins, the country and the democratic party collapse. If Romney wins, the country and the republican party collapse.


3 posted on 11/23/2011 7:46:03 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Insightful, one-of-a-kind analysis and observation. Definitely worthy of its own thread.


5 posted on 11/23/2011 7:47:14 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Pathetic.


6 posted on 11/23/2011 7:48:17 AM PST by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
I'm still about the most conservative citizen around

Key word: about.

Sounds subjective to me.

I'm sure in certain circles, Hillary Clinton is the most conservative citizen around.

7 posted on 11/23/2011 7:48:30 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Of course you will, as will 90+ percent of the rest of us..
Newt is a devil but I would vote for him in a minute..

Its like election of 2000 when Alfred E. Nueman was running against Francois Kerry...
OR the election before when AL ran against AL Gorp...

You HAD to vote for AL no matter the name he used at the time..


8 posted on 11/23/2011 7:49:30 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Your attitude is exactly what the Rino’s in the GOP leadship are banking on. Conservatives have no place to go so they will have to vote for Romney. The Tea Party people will not stand for it, we have voted for our last rino. At least we can try to run a true conservative in 4 years instead of having Mitt run again.


9 posted on 11/23/2011 7:50:11 AM PST by Lets Roll NOW (Karl Rove can KMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
It's too early to fold. You people would make terrible poker players.

Errrrrrr.....on second thought, I'll bet you're a TERRIFIC poker player. What say we get together for a few hands. Nothing for you to worry about. I'm a horrible poker player. I suck. You can probably take me for everything I have. Whattya say? C'mon. It'll be fun.

11 posted on 11/23/2011 7:51:16 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich; bigfootbob
While many of us get distracted by trying to find what we consider to be the perfect candidate, we may sometimes lose sight of the fact that the objective here is to eliminate Bark Obama from America's future.

Once a new administration is in place we will have the greatest effect on the individual issues that we value by applying our influence on the congress. A president is not always as influential in the scheme of domestic policy as we would like to think. But, the Barney Franks, Harry Reids and Didk Durbins are capable of doing great harm to us while the Marco Rubios, Mike Lees and Michele Bachmans can be great weapons in our defense of America's heritage. We need to elect more of the latter.

12 posted on 11/23/2011 7:52:12 AM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

14 posted on 11/23/2011 7:53:31 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
actually you are wrong, there is a reason besides pride to not vote for Romney, and here's why:

A RINO can actually do far more damage than a liberal when Republicans control one or both houses of congress. The reason this is so is because there are a certain number of what I call partisans who will vote for (anything) if the president has a matching letter to theirs after their name, while the exact same people would fight to the death if they exact same thing had been proposed by someone with a different letter than them after their name.

So as things stand right now, we have a Democratic president, and we hold the house. We will still hold the house and most likely the Senate too after the election, thus if Obama gets elected ... nothing will happen, it will be gridlock.

BUT if a RINO like Romney gets in... there is no telling what kind of liberal tripe he will be able to pass.

Instead of just repealing Obamacare... we would get the RINO version of it.

Instead of actually sealing the border and deporting the illegals... we would get a “comhensive plan” aka amnesty.

Instead of cutting federal spending... we would get increases to the programs favored by the RINO’s

I could go on and on.

With Obama we get gridlock, we a RINO we are worse off than now.

Of course the best solution would be to elect a conservative like Cain who working with a Republican congress can actually get us back on the right track.

15 posted on 11/23/2011 7:55:20 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (I had considered voting for Gingrich... but on second thought ... it would not be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Romney would govern no differently that BHO, so we must make sure he does not win the primary.


17 posted on 11/23/2011 7:55:49 AM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

“Again, there is no salient argument for not voting against Obama if Romney is the nominee.”

I can think of a few right off the top of my head. That said, I will not vote for Mitt Romney, primary nor general. I WILL vote for conservative candidate in the congressional and state races but under no circumstances will Mitt Romney get my vote.

I did not vote for John McCain. Romney is even further left. Unlike many others here at FR, I do not hate the man, I just don’t believe any damned thing he says. I could care less about his religion, it’s his politics that are the deal breaker.

One moment; actually his religion DOES come into play. I don’t care WHAT you claim to believe or worship, but LIVE it. Mitt doesn’t. The mormons are NOT pro-gay, pro-abort, anti-gun.

Mitt Romney is. If a man will lie to his god, his church and himself, he has NO business being in the White House.


18 posted on 11/23/2011 8:00:00 AM PST by Grunthor (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2Czeraw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

“I’m still about the most conservative citizen around and I can take it. “

Ummm, maybe not.


19 posted on 11/23/2011 8:00:56 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
I think this is a little premature - right now our focus should be on getting a nominee worthy of our support. Romney isn't that.

I think our time and energy is better spent rebelling against the media who are trying to pick the republican nominee by, one by one, calling each candidate (except, so far, Romney) the front runner and then proceeding to smear them. Looks like Ron Paul is up now.

After the hysterical accusations about Cain - "Where's the beef?" The best they could come up with is a serial harassment accusser and a uncredible bimbo with more holes in her story than a wheel of swiss cheese? The accuser who got a settlement has been released from her confidentiality by the National Restaurant Association - why haven't we heard the details? Perhaps, because there is no "there" there? Her handlers obviously think she gets more mileage out of vague allegations than presenting EVIDENCE, probably because her story would make 3/4 of America go "Give me a break!"

If and when Romney is the nominee, we will have several months to debate which is the lesser of two evils. Until then, I prefer to worry about getting a decent nominee.

20 posted on 11/23/2011 8:01:07 AM PST by In Maryland ("If stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?" - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
I gotta agree with you, for one reason only.

Judges. I'd much rather have Romney appointing federal judges than Obama.

I could never work for Romney, nor could I bring myself to donate to his campaign. But I won't stay home if it's a Romney-Obama election.

I'm tired of fascist/socialist judges. I don't want anymore of those.

22 posted on 11/23/2011 8:01:24 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Principled surrender or sumthin’.......


23 posted on 11/23/2011 8:01:43 AM PST by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
Again, there is no salient argument for not voting against Obama if Romney is the nominee.

At this point, I am not entertaining that thought. We have a few viable anti Mittens candidates left and he is flat in the low 20's, poll wise. Now if we get to next Oct and I have a gun held to my head, I a sure I will probably vote against Obummer no matter what. My deep seeded hatred of that POS is on many levels and knows no bounds.

FUBO

24 posted on 11/23/2011 8:06:19 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Your attitude is exactly what the a-holes that are trying to ram mittens down our throat are counting on.

I wouldn’t vote for mittens if you put a gun to my head.


25 posted on 11/23/2011 8:07:04 AM PST by Spruce (I will never vote for Mitt Romney. And nothing will change that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
There are some good reasons not to vote for Romney, should he become the nominee.

1. A vote for Romney will legitimize liberalism (again).

2. Romney cannot win the general election, and another Obama win will demoralize the country.

3. My own conscience will not allow it. I couldn't live with myself, nor sleep in peace if I had done that.

4. No matter who he would pick as his running mate will not haul his candidacy out of the gutter.

And apparently I am much more conservative than you, so you simply would not understand.

27 posted on 11/23/2011 8:13:31 AM PST by Designer (Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson