Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weight of water from global warming is causing and will cause large earthquakes!!
Vanity post

Posted on 12/26/2011 9:15:48 PM PST by Wicket

A friend of mine watches the History Channel, because that's true information. Apparently she's seen a program twice about how global warming is causing the ice to melt and the additional weight of the water is increasing the likelihood of earthquakes.

Danger, Will Robinson, danger!!!


TOPICS: Religion; Science; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: earthquakes; globalwarming; gorebullwarming; teotwawki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Ernie Kaputnik
Hmmmm. A pound of gold is lighter than the others. 373g to 454g.

Tell me why.

41 posted on 12/26/2011 10:49:02 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yep, when sea ice melts the water level shoots up. That is why when you order a drink on the rocks, you must drink it quickly ;)


42 posted on 12/26/2011 10:50:55 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daaave

To #27; ‘picky, picky,picky!’


43 posted on 12/26/2011 10:53:58 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wicket

The 3 Gorges Dam in China is changing the earth’s behavior. If that bad boy blows, we’re talking major population reduction.


44 posted on 12/26/2011 10:54:37 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

*laugh* I erased my reply on that, choosing C, and explaining it. :) Figured that I’d be a pain for pointing it out.


45 posted on 12/26/2011 10:54:43 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Going from freezing to liquid changes the weight? Who knew?”

Well, the folks from History Channel obviously had the inside poop. It’s great they didn’t participate in the coverup.


46 posted on 12/26/2011 11:04:36 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lurk
Interesting, decided to do some brief research, as I had recalled something about 3 gorges damn and the Indonesian earthquake. When completely filled, the dam will increase the length of the 'day' by .06 microseconds. By comparison, the Indonesian earthquake shortened the day by 2.68 microseconds. Going JUST by these two isolated measurements, we are still in a deficit of 2.62 microseconds just from the earthquake, and man's largest accumulation of weight in a single project just barely tips the scales of 2% of effect of a single natural event on the daily rotational time of the earth.

Always we must remember that even the most concentrated efforts by man simply is barely registered by the vast engine that is our planet.

47 posted on 12/26/2011 11:06:11 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Nah, you should always point out disinformation, otherwise it gets to be a bigger pain later.


48 posted on 12/26/2011 11:08:33 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Deflation? Fluctuations in the gravitational constant caused by gold’s aura?


49 posted on 12/26/2011 11:08:37 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wicket

50 posted on 12/26/2011 11:28:08 PM PST by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
I knew the jig was up when Canada refused to go along with the scheme. Well, I better turn off the sprinklers now, just in case...
51 posted on 12/26/2011 11:29:13 PM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have to admit that when I had my first car at 16 I thought the tires weighed a lot more when they had air in them.


52 posted on 12/26/2011 11:34:07 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

France


53 posted on 12/26/2011 11:34:07 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Gold uses the Troy pound, which is equal to 12 Troy ounces. Everything other than precious metals uses avoirdupois weights, which is equal to 16 avoirdupois ounces.

However, an ounce of gold weighs more than an ounce of water, since water is weighed using the lighter avoirdupois ounce.

I learned this right before I lost all of my silver in the move.


54 posted on 12/26/2011 11:48:44 PM PST by NorthStarStateConservative (The Democrat Party: Making Black People Slaves in Some Form Or The Other Since the 1850s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: davius

I know you are joking, but did you know a pound of gold weighs less than a pound of lead?

A pound of gold weighs 5,760 grains. A pound of lead weighs 7,000.

Gold is weighed in the Troy System, lead in the Avoirdupois System.


55 posted on 12/26/2011 11:51:08 PM PST by gitmo (Hatred of those who think differently is the left's unifying principle.-Ralph Peters NY Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Where?

There'd be some cracking and popping (in Greenland) from isostatic rebound after the 15000 ft. of ice melted off, but we aren't talking downtown LA or SF here.

56 posted on 12/26/2011 11:58:49 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; staytrue

I’ll go with that but somehow I don’t think that is what staytrue had in mind.


57 posted on 12/27/2011 12:03:21 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Just putting it in perspective. I seriously doubt there would be global tectonic destabilization, and at least we could run for (warmer) high ground...in Alaska.


58 posted on 12/27/2011 12:09:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
You did straighten her out, didn't you?

History Channel is a notorious source of misinformation and false history.

Local earthquakes are a natural consequence of glaciers melting and the Earth's crust rebounding to higher elevations as the water runoff removes the weight of the glacier ice and meltwater into the sea. This has been going on ever since geological ages before the current interglacial period began to melt the continental ice sheets 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. Examples include the localized earthquakes in Scandinavia and Britain.

The glaciers of Greenland have been relatively stable during the past 50 years, with some growing and some retreating. At the moment, there has been a sudden and significant stabilization or increases in their size as the conditions have changed to colder conditions this past decade.

Humans do not want the conditions to become any colder or the atmosphere to have less carbon dioxide concentrations. The carbon dioxide concentrations are among the lowest to have ever occurred in the Earth's past, and such low carbon dioxide concentrations are potentially lethal to the biosphere and the Plant Kingdom which seves as the base of the food chain for the entire planet. Photosynthesis is impaired and then ceases as carbon dioxide concentrations fall below the minimums necessary to sustain photosynthetic lifeforms. There Earth started out with a second atmosphere 100 times greater in mass than today with concentrations of carbon dioxide greater than about 98 percent. Life consumed this huge atmosphere of carbon dioxide, converting some of it into today's atmospheric oxygen we need to breathe and depositing much of the rest of it as carbonate rocks in the sea and on the land. Life removed so much carbon dioxide, it became a trace gas measured in thousands of parts per million parts of the atmosphere. By the time humans came along, the carbon dioxide had been reduced even further from several thousand parts per million to two thousand parts per million, and finally hundreds of parts per million. Man's influence is measured in tens of parts per million or less. Water vapor is a far more potent gas for retaining thermal energy in the Earth's environment, yet the Alarmists refuse to discuss the role of water vapor in the Earth's natural climate change variability.

Because of the freezing temperatures, ice loss from the glaciers is mostly by increases in their mass resulting in growth and calving of icebergs into the sea, by sublimation from ice to water vapor, and some lesser amounts by meltwater runoff into the sea. Glacial meltwater removes weight from a continental landmass, so it certainly does not increase weight on a continental landmass (LOL).

You might also let your friend know that it is extremely abnormal and dangerous to the biosphere for the Earth's Arctic region to have an icesheet like it does today. The normal condition of the Arctic is to have an icefree Arctic sea and no glaciers whatsoever in Greenland. The last time the Earth had an ice age of this extent of cold and ice sheets was 2.2 billion years ago, when the continent of Greenland was located in the Southern Hemisphere closer to the Antarctic and life had not yet colonized the continental landmasses, grass did not exist, and trees did not exist. Even as recently as only a few million years ago, the southern half of Greenland was warm enough to have palm type trees and tropical fauna such as crocodiles. Forests stood on the southern half of Greenland only some tens of thousands of years ago.

The present interglacial period is due to end anytime between the present and the next several thousands of years. The current period is already perhaps overdue for another glacial period to resume.

When the current interglacial period ends and the next glacial period resumes, the permanent ice sheets will once again grow out of the Arctic and Greenland to cover the land and seas to the south as far as the Central United States and Central Europe as it did before. There will, of course, be no shortage of glacial ice sheets with their weights bearing down on the continental plates and flexing them to trigger earthquakes. There is nothing humans can do to stop this ice age from occurring, and not even the immediate combustion of every drop of fossil fuel known to man in the past, present, and future contains enough thermal energy to stop the ice sheets from growing.

Ice ages are very rare in Earth's past, you can count them on the fingers of one hand, and they will become even more rare in the Earth's future as the Sun inevitably grows in size and luminosity. The next glacial period and any after that will eventually end as the current ice age comes to its inevitable end. The growing Sun will eventually scour the Earth, vaporize the hydrosphere, remove the Earth's atmosphere, and vaporize the Earth's remaining surfaces, leaving a barren surface with little more than traces of its former atmosphere. The Earth may barely escape being consumed by the Sun as its orbit increases in size, taking the Earth into the area of the Solar System now orbits. Mercury and Venus will be consumed by the Sun and vaporized inside it.

Not only will the Earth no longer have any glaciers or ice sheets, it will no longer have any oceans, seas, lakes, rivers, or atmosphere. Even the topmost soils and rock will be vaporized and the vapors blown by the Solar winds into the outer reaches of the Solar System.

Now, about those earthquakes (smile)...and human influences....

59 posted on 12/27/2011 12:16:07 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

The difference is that you are talking rebound after the removal of the weight of the icecap. That’s legit. Staytrue is talking about the general addition of the weight of the meltwater over the entire world ocean.


60 posted on 12/27/2011 12:27:17 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson