Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scripps blockbuster: Ocean acidification happens all the time — naturally
JoNova ^ | January 9th, 2012 | Joanne

Posted on 01/08/2012 8:33:36 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

There goes another scare campaign.

Until recently we had very little data about real time changes in ocean pH around the world. Finally autonomous sensors placed in a variety of ecosystems “from tropical to polar, open-ocean to coastal, kelp forest to coral reef” give us the information we needed.

It turns out that far from being a stable pH, spots all over the world are constantly changing. One spot in the ocean varied by an astonishing 1.4 pH units regularly. All our human emissions are projected by models to change the world’s oceans by about 0.3 pH units over the next 90 years, and that’s referred to as “catastrophic”, yet we now know that fish and some calcifying critters adapt naturally to changes far larger than that every year, sometimes in just a month, and in extreme cases, in just a day.

Data was collected by 15 individual SeaFET sensors in seven types of marine habitats.  Four sites were fairly stable (1, which includes the open ocean, and also sites 2,3,4) but most of the rest were highly variable (esp site 15 near Italy and 14 near Mexico) . On a monthly scale the pH varies by 0.024 to 1.430 pH units.

Figure 1. Map of pH sensor (SeaFET) deployment locations.

See Table 1 for details of locations

The authors draw two conclusions: (1) most non-open ocean sites vary a lot, and (2) and some spots vary so much they reach the “extreme” pH’s forecast for the doomsday future scenarios on a daily (a daily!) basis.

At Puerto Morelos (in Mexico’s easternmost state, on the Yucatán Peninsula) the pH varied as much as 0.3 units per hour due to groundwater springs. Each day the pH bottomed at about 10am, and peaked shortly after sunset. These extreme sites tell us that some marine life can cope with larger, faster swings than the apocalyptic predictions suggest, though of course, no one is suggesting that the entire global ocean would be happy with similar extreme swings.

Even the more stable and vast open ocean is not a fixed pH all year round. Hoffman writes that “Open-water areas (in the Southern Ocean) experience a strong seasonal shift in seawater pH (~0.3–0.5 units) between austral summer and winter.”

This paper is such a game changer, they talk about rewriting the null hypothesis:

“This natural variability has prompted the suggestion that “an appropriate null hypothesis may be, until evidence is obtained to the contrary, that major biogeochemical processes in the oceans other than calcification will not be fundamentally different under future higher CO2/lower pH conditions””

 

Matt Ridley: Taking Fears Of Acid Oceans With A Grain of Salt

[GWPF]  [Wall St Journal]

The central concern is that lower pH will make it harder for corals, clams and other “calcifier” creatures to make calcium carbonate skeletons and shells. Yet this concern also may be overstated. Off Papua New Guinea and the Italian island of Ischia, where natural carbon-dioxide bubbles from volcanic vents make the sea less alkaline, and off the Yucatan, where underwater springs make seawater actually acidic, studies have shown that at least some kinds of calcifiers still thrive—at least as far down as pH 7.8.

In a recent experiment in the Mediterranean, reported in Nature Climate Change, corals and mollusks were transplanted to lower pH sites, where they proved “able to calcify and grow at even faster than normal rates when exposed to the high [carbon-dioxide] levels projected for the next 300 years.” In any case, freshwater mussels thrive in Scottish rivers, where the pH is as low as five.

Human beings have indeed placed marine ecosystems under terrible pressure, but the chief culprits are overfishing and pollution. By comparison, a very slow reduction in the alkalinity of the oceans, well within the range of natural variation, is a modest threat, and it certainly does not merit apocalyptic headlines.

 

We also know that adding CO2 in a sense is feeding the calcifying organisms (like it feeds life above the water too). Co2 dissolves as bicarbonate, which marine uses to make skeletons and shells from. So yes, a lower pH dissolves shells, but the extra CO2 increases shell formation.

 

..

Figure 2. pH dynamics at 15 locations worldwide in 0–15 m water depth. All panels are plotted on the same vertical range of pH (total hydrogen ion scale). The ordinate axis was arbitrarily selected to encompass a 30-day period during each sensor deployment representative of each site during the deployment season. See Table 1 for details regarding sensor deployment.

Figure 3. Metrics of short-term pH variability at 15 locations worldwide, ranked by ascending values. Mean = geometric mean; Max = maximum value recorded; Min = minimum value recorded; SD = standard deviation; Range = Max - Min; Rate = mean of the absolute rate of change between adjacent data points.

There are caveats: possibly marine life is already operating at the “edge of it’s tolerances” (we don’t know), so pushing things further may be still detrimental. Also these extreme environments don’t have the same variety of organisms that less extreme ones do, so we don’t really want to convert the whole equatorial ocean into life as it exists in one Mexican Bay. But conditions in some places are changing more on daily basis than we are being warned to fear from a century long trend.

The bottom line is that claims that these pH changes are unprecedented, fast or unnatural are overstating things dramatically.  Typical estuarine environments have an inflow from rivers (with a lower pH) that fluctuates wildly, so do areas with upwelling, and even the pH in kelp forests varies dynamically.

The alarmist headlines, fears of mass starvation, and satanic allusions are unjustified:

‘Scientists label this acid trend “the evil twin of climate change”.

Anthropogenic climate change set to trigger tipping points,

Ocean acid threatens food chain,

Bbc News – ‘Acidifying oceans’ threaten food supply, Uk warns,

What we don’t know vastly eclipses what we do. We need to study the effects of human emissions of CO2, but not at the expense of other far more pressing threats.

If we care about ocean-life (not to mention our food supply) we need to focus on things that threaten it now.

 REFERENCES:

Hofmann GE, Smith JE, Johnson KS, Send U, Levin LA, et al. (2011) High-Frequency Dynamics of Ocean pH: A Multi-Ecosystem Comparison. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28983. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028983 [PLOS paper and graphs sourced here]

Hat tip Brice Bosnich (who wrote the post: The chemistry of ocean pH and “acidification”).

———————–

Other information on the topic from the SPPI site:

C02 Science’s Ocean Acidification Database

Quantifying the Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Organisms

Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Ecosystems

Answers to a Fisherman’s Testimony about Ocean Acidification

EPA’s Role in Protecting Ocean Health Should Focus on the “Here-and-Now” Threats

See also CO2 Science website for reviewed papers on the topic 

 

 

 


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science
KEYWORDS: climatechange; co2; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenhousegases; oceanacidification

1 posted on 01/08/2012 8:33:44 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...

fyi


2 posted on 01/08/2012 8:35:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Science by headline is a really stupid idea.


3 posted on 01/08/2012 8:41:37 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Natural World was once really mysterious. No one knew what was going on, they just watched in awe as the world did what the world did.

Then we discovered Science and began to understand some of what went on around us. For centuries, our knowledge grew and grew.

Then we allowed the government to run the schools.

Today, the Natural World is really mysterious. Journalists don't know what is going on, they just watch in awe as the world does what the world does.

4 posted on 01/08/2012 8:57:54 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

“Science by headline is a really stupid idea.”

For science, yes, it’s stupid. But for shaping opinions of the uninformed to effect “environmental justice” it works just fine.

Shaping opinion is the goal here.


5 posted on 01/08/2012 8:59:12 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Sure. But I was referring to all the previous headlines.


6 posted on 01/08/2012 9:00:46 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

OK, but I was thinking that science by headline is basically a disinformation tactic of the left. I think we agree but I’m not sure we are connecting on the same plane.


7 posted on 01/08/2012 9:03:37 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Right again, although the right could potentially make the same mistake in the future for all we know. As for connecting on the same plane, that sounds kinda kinky.


8 posted on 01/08/2012 9:29:23 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If the ocean did lower its PH below 7 then it would be acidic and the calcium structures would dissolve to the point where it would again become neutral or alkaline.


9 posted on 01/08/2012 9:33:07 PM PST by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
Shssss....don't confuse the propaganda line ...
10 posted on 01/08/2012 9:43:51 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One spot in the ocean varied by an astonishing 1.4 pH units regularly. All our human emissions are projected by models to change the world’s oceans by about 0.3 pH units over the next 90 years, and that’s referred to as “catastrophic”,...

That's catastrophic, mannnnnnn!!!

... yet we now know that fish and some calcifying critters adapt naturally to changes far larger than that every year, sometimes in just a month, and in extreme cases, in just a day.

It's just one day, dude.

Bwaaaaahahahahahahaaaaaaa! ha

bookmarked

11 posted on 01/08/2012 10:01:01 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
LOL...You like that eh...

Nite.

12 posted on 01/08/2012 10:03:12 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You bring us the best news day after day, E_a_t_B.

Nothing does my heart so much good than to have a big laugh at the expense of a liberal shibboleth. :-)

13 posted on 01/08/2012 10:08:28 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Does my heart good....must go amd rest my weary eyes...too much football watching on the TV

Go Tebow!

Next year...Go Chiefs!

14 posted on 01/08/2012 10:12:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; grey_whiskers; ApplegateRanch; Whenifhow; WL-law; Berlin_Freeper; Horusra; ...
Thanx for the ping Ernest_at_the_Beach !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

15 posted on 01/09/2012 3:14:24 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Ernest_at_the_Beach.


16 posted on 01/09/2012 4:47:59 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What’s all that talk about “pH units”? The pH value, being a logarithm, is just a number; it neither is nor has a unit.


17 posted on 01/09/2012 5:39:52 AM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

lol what time do we board? jk


18 posted on 01/09/2012 6:42:45 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good article.


19 posted on 01/09/2012 11:38:46 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson