Posted on 02/23/2012 1:02:23 AM PST by meatloaf
Poll on voice of America website. Would you support an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities? Sorry.Only yes is an option but not HELL YES!
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/middle-east/?c=y&pollSubmitted=y#pollAnchor&mr=1&oid=1&pid=139691783&cid=8500664
Absolutely!
Not yes, but HELL YES!
You can never have too much overkill.
Absolutely.
Without hesitation.
First of all there's this :
Assasinated Iranian Scientist's Goal
Repeatedly, it has been shown over and over that 60 to 70% of all muslims in North Africa and the Middle East and North Africa, indeed worldwide feel the same way. Fortunately 99.9% of muslims are genetically incapable of rising above subsistence intellect. However, the remainder amount to 6,000,000 educated fanatic competent self declared mass murderers. A sobering thought for any country, never mind a tiny one outnumbered 40 to 1.
Anyone in the US, including our so-called leaders and self-styled elite have the right to decide for themselves whether they would attack first under similar circumstances, or expose themselves to nuclear attack by savages.
No one, however, can make that choice for any other country. To adopt, as a matter of national policy to absorb a first strike to "prove" moral justification for destroying the enemy first.
Overwhelming historical facts clearly demonstrate that our irrational argument supporting muslims is based entirely on their control of the world oil supply.
A shaky moral and ethical position for, arguably, the most powerful country on earth.
Yes
Not till after I get back from there in April.
LLS
No need to...
...the one true God will, as He has done in Chernobyl, confound the devils disciples in Iran to operate their evil science in a reckless manner.
Keep saying the rosary and just wait and see.
Golly, I'll have to ponder that one/s
At this point, I think our support is irrelevant. Israel has a duty to protect her own people, including responding to a reasonably perceived imminent threat. It might well be better if she makes it clear that she is neither our agent nor our client-state.
What scares me is that you even have to ask this question on a conservative website.
No; that should just be for starters. While they're at it, hit Iran's government facilities, command and control centers, etc. While they're on a roll, hit Damascus, Mecca, and Medina.....with promises to lob nukes at anyone who even thinks about striking back.
...but hey...that's just me.
If Barrack H. Obama (H could stand for Hitler) wants to bring our nuclear arsenal down from 1500 to 300, why let all those nukes go to waste?
I am for overthrow of the government and turn it into a Christian Nation.
If not now-when—Patrick Henry and I agree not yes but Hell Yes —clearly the Muslim in our white house will not stand with Israel.
Cute! I noticed intrade is tracking up.
Bomb, Bomb, Bomb...Bomb, Bomb, Iran.
As long as they use some of those 200-300 nukes they are supposed to have, to create nuclear “accidents” at the Ianian nuke sites and maintain plausible deniability, do it.
Ianian nuke sites
IRANIAN
Preview is your friend, JimRed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.