Posted on 03/03/2012 2:31:39 AM PST by Keli Kilohana
We know Ms. Fluke needs $3000 a year... Does anybody know how that compares to what Warren Buffet's secretary needs?
BWAAA HAAAA HAA HA
Regards
alfa6 ;>}
What she indicated was...her associates all needed $3k of birth control over a three-year period at Georgetown University.
So you stand back and think about this. Tuition, books, and on-campus dorms/meals all run about $59k a year, and you can figure these kids need $10k a year in the Washington area for pocket money (Starbucks coffee, pizza, gas, subway tickets, etc). So it’s 70k for three years ($210k), to become the fancy-pants lawyer. Yet the single cost they complain about in front of the Congressional committee? Birth control. They spend probably $1k a year just on Starbucks coffee.
Then you turn around and figure up what real birth control costs at Wal-Mart. Roughly twelve bucks, without health insurance, per month. This $1000 a year that Ms Fluke waves around? If you went to the most expensive drug store around Washington, and asked for the most expensive birth control they have, and paid absolute full price (no student discount)....you might spend $700 a year.
Just a humble opinion here....I don’t think she has ever bought birth control pills, and neither has any of her associates. They have no idea what the actual real cost is. That’s the only way...that her story is legit.
I was figuring she was gonna have three abortions per year, on average.
The hubris of the Socialists knows no bounds. That she would bold faced lie/rubber-band the truth in testimony before Congress and the world by claiming it cost $3,000 in 3 years for contraceptives. (Those must be some Cadillac pills.)
ARe they really so confident in their take over - or take down? - of our country that they can bald faced lie to our faces? They HAVE to know that every woman out here who take or have taken 'the pill' know this is an outright fabrication.
If the pill sells at WalMart for $9 a month, or $324 for 3 yrs, one might wonder if the script she was reading for was crafted by someone else and there was a typo - adding an extra "0"? And that, not being there to testify to truth so much as to push the Socialist agenda, she didn't catch the whopping mistake.
Even so, one can suspicion that she's uber-proud of her role in this scheme, even though her name will now make her laughing stock for decades.
After all, Dear Leader is proud of her.
I’m already using her name as a joke like- I’m fluked!
And to top it off her “testimony” was before a DIMocRAT non-committee non-hearing. What a putz and loser. However, I bet her liberal asshat parents are proud of her. All libs love losers. This is such an obvious moonbat move by this sexual degenerate.
And she wants FREE birth control!
I pay for Medicare and a supplemental policy. Co pay for one of my prescriptions is almost $100 a month, wish it was free. How do I go about testifying before Congress?
She keeps up the ruse this is a women’s health issue. I wish someone would simply ask her how much protection against STDs is a birth control pill?
hee hee
What about the danger of birth control pills???? According to Obama and his Democrats——preventing pregnany is cheaper than paying for childbirth and aftercare....thus they justify making us all pay for birth control pills for the women who want to assume the risk of using birth control pills-——and they want to force insurance companies to cover the cost of birth control pills as a basic benefit of the insurance...but
the drug companies get sued all the time over harmful effects of birth control pills such as strokes and bleeding, etc.
So is ObamaCare partly about letting trial lawyers also sue insurance companies too over birth control pills??? Are the insurance execs who are FOR ObamaCare aware that if they pay for women’s birth control pills, then the Dem trial lawyers will be suing them????
She is right out of central casting replete with Hillary’s hand me down pant suit and presumably the same hair stylist as it appears to be three days removed from soap and water! Cry me a river, news like this makes me highly irregular so I need some free suppositories. I ask, where oh where is my government hand out? Stand by, there is the neighbor’s dog depositing my first shipment. What a disappointment; just the same old...
The issue is that the student insurance offered by Georgetown did not include birth control coverage because as a Catholic institution it would violate their religious doctrine.I would assume the policy that does not include birth control coverage is cheaper than one that does. Student health insurance policies that include birth control coverage are readily available with all private health insurers.So she could easily have obtained a policy that included birth control coverage and paid the extra premium with any number of student health insurance carriers. Instead she insisted that students attending school to get an education rather than sleeping around should be forced to pay the extra premium to have coverage for something they have no intention of ever using. I guess freedom of choice to her means whom she chooses to sleep with that evening rather than individuals having the right to choose.
“Fluke, you ignorant slut.”
Now they are going after his sponsors, like they usually attempt to shut people up.
Tragedy! Tragedy! This poor woman not only has to pay 60 grand a year for college, she will be forced to purchase back alley condoms. These are probably made in some place like Samolia and have a high failure rate. Better to request a Starbucks subsidy. This is the real story of poverty in America. Doesn’t capitalism suck? I bet they don’t have these kinds of problems in North Korea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.