Posted on 03/30/2012 3:21:35 PM PDT by Hunton Peck
A California woman has reportedly filed a federal lawsuit against McDonald's, claiming the fast-food franchise had a role in her becoming a prostitute two decades ago.
Shelley Lynn claims in the suit that she was "economically and psychologically" coerced into prostitution by her ex-husband and former manager at a McDonald's in Arroyo Grande, Calif., the Courthouse News Service reported this week.
Lynn, who was hired by the restaurant to work behind the counter in 1982, claims in the complaint that her former boss and ex-husband, Keith Handley, pushed her into prostitution in Nevada and also "engaged in pimping operations out of...
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I wonder if they ordered the sex through the drive-thru?
Two decades a ho? Oh, sweet Lord, NO PICS!
“wonder if they ordered the sex through the drive-thru?”
Super size it!
I see that Ronald is enthusiastic!
We are talking pink slime here.
Looks like the golden arches have closed. Pretty funny, even if pretty rude!
From now on I think I’ll order the fish without tarter sauce.
Happy Ending Meal.
I wonder if she got fries with that shake?
“Would you like fries with that”?
So her ex boss, ex husband, ran the franchises.
But a McDonald’s franchise doesn’t have the deepest pockets or the biggest bucks.
McDonald’s at the corporate level has the big bucks and deep pockets, so that’s why the lawsuit goes against them.
They hint at other issues, such as unions, and lack of affirmative action to help women buy franchises. What are we saying here, that if women can’t buy a McDonald’s franchise, or aren’t recruited for that, then this circumstance forces them to be prostitutes? Legally can they really make the case in court? Is this a nuisance lawsuit? Are they just hoping for an out of court settlement from McDonald’s, sort of a shakedown????
So her ex boss, ex husband, ran the franchises.
But a McDonald’s franchise doesn’t have the deepest pockets or the biggest bucks.
McDonald’s at the corporate level has the big bucks and deep pockets, so that’s why the lawsuit goes against them.
They hint at other issues, such as unions, and lack of affirmative action to help women buy franchises. What are we saying here, that if women can’t buy a McDonald’s franchise, or aren’t recruited for that, then this circumstance forces them to be prostitutes? Legally can they really make the case in court? Is this a nuisance lawsuit? Are they just hoping for an out of court settlement from McDonald’s, sort of a shakedown????
“I remember 12 hamburgers for a dollar when I was a kid.”
I do also.
When we came back from the drag strip in the early 50s we would stop and get a couple of dozen when they were 13 cents each or $1.00/dozen!
If we were bucks up we would go a few blocks more down the street and get Bobs big boys!!!
“Pic to determine guilt or innocence?”
Took a while, but Joe 6-pack has uncovered evidence for the jury’s consideration!
(Also explains Ronald’s enthusiasm)
Will that be for here or to go?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.