Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roman jewellery found in ancient Japan tomb
Nineman.com.au ^ | Friday, June 22, 2012 | AFP

Posted on 06/22/2012 3:03:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: afraidfortherepublic

He must have doubted there would be such danger.


21 posted on 06/22/2012 4:01:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

It’s bad writing, the chemical doesn’t actually melt glass, it’s just used in glass-making. You’d still need a glass kiln to melt the silicon-natron mixture.


22 posted on 06/22/2012 4:19:08 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Vermont Lt
Remember 535 there was a climate anomaly that destroyed Northern and Western European civilization as well as Northern China's civilization.

If you are referring to year 535 AD/CE, where does this enter into this report? If this is a 5th century tomb, it is, as you yourself said, from a time between 401 and 500 AD. So either I misunderstand your post or it is a nonsequiter.

My belief is that the suggestion of the Silk Road is the "Occam Razor" answer since it is well known that the route existed for at least 600 years earlier bringing the silk to Rome. The effort to ship silk west would be ridiculous without equal value traveling east and jewelry was then as is now, high value for small volume and weight.

By most research this was done by actual end-to-end caravans going from trading terminuses in west China to the eastern Roman Empire. The final leg between China and Japan is minor in comparison.

23 posted on 06/22/2012 4:33:07 PM PDT by SES1066 (Government is NOT the reason for my existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
Just setting the time frame a bit better ~ people often forget the good times quit rolling about 535 AD.

Thought I prefaced that enough so it'd be obvious.

24 posted on 06/22/2012 4:46:08 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

A glass bead will roam.


25 posted on 06/22/2012 4:57:48 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (???`?? Who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Tip your waitress, try the veal, I will be here all week.

God, I hope not. ;)

26 posted on 06/22/2012 5:05:45 PM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
"My belief is that the suggestion of the Silk Road is the "Occam Razor" answer since it is well known that the route existed for at least 600 years earlier bringing the silk to Rome. The effort to ship silk west would be ridiculous without equal value traveling east and jewelry was then as is now, high value for small volume and weight. "

Tocharians

27 posted on 06/22/2012 5:06:41 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Natron is another name for sodium hydroxide. Nasty stuff.


28 posted on 06/22/2012 5:15:38 PM PDT by JeanLM (Obama proves melanin is not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
It’s bad writing

Is it me, or does that just seem to happen more often lately?

29 posted on 06/22/2012 5:21:36 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blam

I looked at that thread and saw a number of:

The requested document does not exist on this server.


Okay

Or banned or suspended posters. Reply 123 was a one post n00b back then who has never replied.


30 posted on 06/22/2012 5:43:02 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (It's time to take out the trash in DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
In before the incoherent animus begins.

Well then, how about some authentic Frontier Gibberish?


31 posted on 06/22/2012 5:48:56 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

That was 9.5 years ago. A lot changes in that time.


32 posted on 06/22/2012 5:51:10 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Of course the Romans were sailing all over the orient.

Haven’t you been watching the Spartacus series’ on ... umm... I think it’s Showtime?

The ludicrous where the slaves were training for gladiators had a female slave that was obviously from New Zealand.

That right there is proof positive that Romans were in the asiatics.


33 posted on 06/22/2012 7:39:53 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

It’s not you.


34 posted on 06/22/2012 7:49:57 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

LOL!


35 posted on 06/23/2012 3:03:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson