Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Roberts did it
The Washington Post ^ | June 28, 2012 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 07/01/2012 7:57:19 PM PDT by trekdown

Obamacare is now essentially upheld. There’s only one way it can be overturned. The same way it was passed — elect a new president and a new Congress. That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine. I won’t make it easy for you.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: benedictroberts; obamacare; roberts; ropeadope; ropeadoperoberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: NoLibZone

...whats in pave now?


41 posted on 07/01/2012 9:35:41 PM PDT by Principle Over Politics (Obamney or Rombama 2012. Two sides of the same coin. Pick your poisen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Well said sir. I really hate the attempt to turn defeat into victory.


42 posted on 07/01/2012 9:36:53 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trekdown
I bet Obama/Soros/Jarett are kicking themselves right now. With Nancy Pelosi and Harry Ried in charge of congress they could have banned all fire arms outright, banned Christianity, and limited ‘speech’ soviet style.

All the 'Laws' would have sailed right through the SCOTUS with flying colors. “Ain't my job” *hic*

Everyone touts Krauthammer as some intellectual, yet he's wrong more than he's right. If you talk to people that get their news solely from Fox, they think he's never wrong and defend him vehemently.

I call Kraut a crippled MORON that probably voted for Obama.

43 posted on 07/01/2012 9:37:03 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of their Moonbats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
The phrase which Roberts made that gives me pause is..."The Court is not responsible for the polical choices of the voter." Something like that. So basically that is a declaration that he is not in the buisness of politics. Then he relies on the lies of a political campaign. So his pious justification simply does not follow his own logic. Because he then goes on to affirm what the obama lawyers refused to say and what Obama promised in the political campaign. He affirmed the calculated Obama lie and trashed the argument before his court. His treachery has found him out because he affirmed a political lie and denied the Constitution.

He is liberal...a wolf in sheeps clothing. He is a traitor to his oath and a violator of 300,000,000 people. He is responsible for every government paid abortion in the future. That blood is on his hands. Ironic, isn't it....a Catholic in good standing should give us taxpayor abortion. Where is the voice of the Bishops? Where is voice of the Universal Church? Where was the fidelity to the Constitution? Where was the conscience of Roberts to have voided millions of lives to the abortuaries for reinstating the "credibility of the Court". This man is as much a sociopath as Obama. Harvard brilliance....just a litte smarter than the rest of us. We do not need any more Harvard wisdom on the courts.

44 posted on 07/01/2012 9:46:44 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: trekdown
This is handy too:


45 posted on 07/01/2012 9:48:55 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
"and a Commerce Clause that has been reigned in by the Supreme Court."

Wrong. Of the majority opinion (Roberts and the four liberals) the four liberals dissented over the Commerce Clause. Roberts stood alone on that. Roberts' dicta has no limiting effect on future attempts to expand the Commerce Clause.

This article is already outdated. There was no genius move by Roberts. Neither the liberals nor the conservatives wanted to go along with Roberts. The liberals just took the easy win that does nothing to restrict them in the future.

Krauthammer's whole premise is factually wrong.

46 posted on 07/01/2012 9:56:52 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Call him Judas Roberts instead of Justice Roberts.


47 posted on 07/01/2012 9:58:14 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

What Deagle said, 100% in agreement:

SORRY! This is NOT the job of the Supreme Court! They are suppose to rule on Constitutionality, not anything else!

That means that Roberts did NOT do his duty. Not only that but he disregarded his duty to the Constitution.

Anything else is just an excuse for his vote.

Yes, I am getting madder by the day!!


48 posted on 07/01/2012 9:58:27 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
It wouldn’t be a stretch to consider that the Democrats did something or said something to threaten his family.

Or a fate worse that Breitbart.

Imagine coming into work and finding a plain brown envelope on your desk, full of pics of your kids at the day care or being dropped off at school, with a card saying, "Get the message?"

49 posted on 07/01/2012 9:58:46 PM PDT by Old Sarge (We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

You fail to see that you are siding with Roberts.

He agrees with you. The court’s job is not to legislate. So he told the truth: the Dems lied in refusing to call a tax a tax, it’s a terrible piece of legislation, it’s not the court’s job to legislate, and those who messed it up need to fix it.

It is constitutional for Congress to tax and, apparently, to lie about it.


50 posted on 07/01/2012 10:02:34 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
Yes, I am getting madder by the day!!

So the response is to do what? Vote for anyone who seeks to overturn Obamacare..........right?

That was the point.

51 posted on 07/01/2012 10:08:48 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Bain Capital would not have bought into Solyndra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

It’s the elite “what will they say in the NY Times and at HLS” zone. Status sphere, to use the Tom Wolfe notion. People want status within the sphere where they circulate.

Roberts ignored the role of the SCOTUS is to prevent partisan temporary political winds from extreme changes to our nation. This completely rewrote the relationship between citizens to the government and granted unlimited power to congress over the states and over individuals.

Tax people for being overweight? That’s allowable.

Tax people for not voting?

The Congress does have the power to tax, of course. But there are limits on the power and those powers not expressly delegated... Well, you know the rest.

The weakness for Roberts was his concern the MSM would somehow place the Court and his Chief Justiceship as overly political or active and diminishing the respect of the Court.

Instead he’s turned the Court into a rubberstam of unconstitutional pOlivier and the left sees him as a dupe, a useful Idiot.


52 posted on 07/01/2012 10:10:06 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

If Obamacare is a tax, then it is constitutional.


53 posted on 07/01/2012 10:12:43 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will rot your gut from the inside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

So he can stay “in the closet”. I think those gay rumors might just be true, and he was blackmailed about his past. That treasonous turd in the punchbowl did us NO favors. This stinks to high heaven.


54 posted on 07/01/2012 10:14:24 PM PDT by DesertRhino (perI was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

So he can stay “in the closet”. I think those gay rumors might just be true, and he was blackmailed about his past. That treasonous turd in the punchbowl did us NO favors. This stinks to high heaven.


55 posted on 07/01/2012 10:14:39 PM PDT by DesertRhino (perI was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

I won’t hold my breath waiting for Oblamo to appoint 2 conservative to SCOTUS.


56 posted on 07/01/2012 10:14:51 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will rot your gut from the inside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

Roberts needs to be vetted as to any personal/family gain by his vote. Perhaps a good place to start is with his international links with the likes of his friend Haass at the Council of Foreign Relations. The new world order has found another supporter.


57 posted on 07/01/2012 10:15:21 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

I won’t hold my breath waiting for Oblamo to appoint 2 conservatives to SCOTUS.


58 posted on 07/01/2012 10:15:28 PM PDT by entropy12 (Hate is the most insidious emotion, it will rot your gut from the inside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

John Roberts is a stinking rotten coward.

Our founders put their lifes, their families and their fortunes on the line to make sure we had the freedoms we enjoy, and Roberts pulls this stunt.

He is a despicable man.


59 posted on 07/01/2012 10:15:36 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Sure Kraut, Roberts did it so we can elect libdem Mutt. And when carbon taxes happen maybe we can turn to Olympia Snowe for relief?


60 posted on 07/01/2012 10:18:05 PM PDT by Hayride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson