Posted on 07/08/2012 2:03:50 PM PDT by DallasBiff
The commercial starts with diver David Boudia climbing up the Burj Dubai, and jumping off, with his reflection shown as the way the 9/11 jumpers were, and then he hits the water, and others were following him in their dives, only that they lived and the crowd celebrates.
The poster merely acknowledged YOU posted there was a connection. He or she went and watched it with that claim on their mind.
That is not denial except to someone with an ax to grind and that person is you.
Given what you wrote up thread about only surviving if you dive of a Muslim building, I think you need to walk away and examine yourself.
Many people here, myself for one, lost others on 9/11 whether at the trade center, Pentagon or on flights. Don't tell us how we feel, what we should have read into this ad or that ad or anything of the kind. Got it?
It has nothing to do with 911. Nothing.
And the showers have water at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
I still think you went off the deep end over this commercial. That seems to be the opinion of just about everybody else on this thread also. Why not just give it up and come in off of that limb that you are out on. We won’t hold it against you. Most of us have posted something stupid here at least once or twice.
Well I guess I'm in the league of Charlton Heston at a NRA convention, when he stated "from my dead cold hands".
I'd rather be in Charlton Heston's deep end than yours, which IMO, would be john roberts.
Charlton Heston died a few years ago so he couldn’t possibly have seen the commercial in question. So not sure why the reference?
Ah......Obama voters!
Please, Charlton Heston stated from a NRA covention, "from my cold dead hands" and from my cold dead hands will you get my retraction about this pro-muslim commercial(i.e an American diver diving off of burj dubai and surviving)
BTW, a question, whose deep end would rather be on, Charlton Heston's or john roberts's?
As to your question "which deep end I'd rather be on", I don't get the John Roberts reference either but I suspect you are trying to lay a trap with regard to a previous thread we were on. Again, doesn't have a whole lot of relevance here but I'd be happy to discuss John Roberts.
As to your question "which deep end I'd rather be on", I don't get the John Roberts reference either but I suspect you are trying to lay a trap with regard to a previous thread we were on. Again, doesn't have a whole lot of relevance here but I'd be happy to discuss John Roberts.
Sam Adams are you sometime guest host for Rush, mark davis, you talk in such inanities.
Well I’m not sure I’m getting invited back anytime soon. At least I still have the forum!
Another weird answer, anyways the commercial reminds me of 9/11, I guess I should forget about it.
I’ll probably get reamed for saying this,but you guys have gone wayyyyy off the deep end.
‘And the showers have water at Auschwitz-Birkenau’?
Seriously? And I thought I had loose screws.
It’s a commercial about an Olympic diver and the building represents the amount of dives he took during practice. The 25,000 practice dives were like diving off the highest building in the world over 180 times.
Heaven help me.
You are free to believe what you wish.Some of us see a message in the bottle.
The concentration camp comparison/analogy was beyond nuts.
I showed the commercial to my wife who is conservative but not a news junkie nor a p.o.’d committed righty like me.
I just played the video, didn’t give her a hint. She watched till the reflections flashed by on the glass, then said, “Nine-eleven. That’s not good.”
No tinfoil for me—I doubt it was an intentional thing—but it made me growl at the damned obliviousness of the people who made it.
The whole idea is completely unbelievable. This is Dubai. That guy would be arrested for wearing that little swimsuit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.