http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ
Posted on 03/18/2013 11:56:36 AM PDT by SMCC1
"Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued."
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
So when you throw out any moral absolutes - you get....
“Morally irrelevant” babies? Sounds more like MORALLY BANKRUPT adults to me!
I see certain medical ethicists as “morally irrelevant.” Shall we kill them too?
Recall a guy at Princeton from years ago - found this after a search:
There is some trivia about Princeton University that many people are not aware of. When I ask someone, “Did you know that Princeton University has helped to support infanticide and bestiality for the past 14 years?” - there is usually a look of disbelief. Many Americans have a difficult time accepting the fact that a practicing professor at Princeton University, Peter Singer, would be able to promote such activities as infanticide and zoophilia, also known as bestiality, there at that institution.
Academically verified fiends.
Has the world gone mad? The good news is that thousands lined up to buy ammo at Sacramento gun show.
Has the world gone mad? The good news is that thousands lined up to buy ammo at Sacramento gun show.
The crap these supposedly “educated” people spew from their mouths is stunning.
A quote from Singer. Scary last sentence.
Opponents of abortion ought to welcome articles arguing that there is no real difference of moral status between the fetus and the newborn, for they have been arguing that themselves for many years. Their problem, apparently, is that most of them do not know how to argue against anyone who agrees with them that the fetus and newborn infant have the same moral status, but then denies that merely existing as an innocent living human being is enough to give a being a right to life.
Killing liberals is morally irrelevant.
Just following the progressive path here...
yep, they argue in favor of infanticide
“What these young colleagues are spelling out is what we (knew) would be the inevitable end point of a road that ethical philosophers in the States and Australia have all been treading for a long time and there is certainly nothing new.”
Referring to the term “after-birth abortion”, Dr Stammers added: “This is just verbal manipulation that is not philosophy. I might refer to abortion henceforth as antenatal infanticide.”
Well, at least now they are fully out in the open.
There are those folks out there [from both sides of the political spectrum] who snicker at that remark.
“We don’t need (or want) any stinkin morals”.
Not surprise at all.
Abortion leads to euthanasia and infanticide. Pretty soon, “right to die” will become “duty to die.” It will come even faster with socialized medicine.
You got that right.
Slippery slope. Human life is being devalued. Then Old people will be killed because they are no longer useful. The shadow of tyranny.
THey’re right about one thing, killing babies and abortion are equal....equally abhorrent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.