Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge refuses to block new meat labeling rules
Associated Press ^ | Sep 12, 2013 10:09 PM EDT | Josh Funk

Posted on 09/12/2013 10:14:35 PM PDT by Olog-hai

A federal judge has refused to block new rules that require the meat industry to include specific information about the origin of their products on labels. Industry groups say they’ll continue fighting.

The new rules took effect in May and require labels for steaks, ribs and other cuts of meat include clear information about where the animals were born, raised and slaughtered. …

The lawsuit argues that the rule violates the U.S. Constitution because it forces meat producers to provide information about their products, and the groups argue that officials overstepped their authority with the rules. …

The labeling rules have support from consumer groups, environmental groups and some other farmers’ groups.

Under the new rules, labels must specify, for example, “Born in Mexico, raised and slaughtered in the United States.” The previous labeling rule required only the country of origin to be noted, such as “Product of U.S.” or “Product of U.S. and Canada.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food
KEYWORDS: meat; meatlabeling; meatproducts

1 posted on 09/12/2013 10:14:36 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I would think that that this is a self regulating issue. If I want to buy Nolan Ryan Beef it is already labeled and states where it came from


2 posted on 09/12/2013 10:16:51 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I was born a poor black cow. I remember the days, standin' in the pasture with my family, mooin' and eatin' grass down in Oklahoma...

3 posted on 09/12/2013 10:20:38 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Don't blame me for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

lolz


4 posted on 09/12/2013 10:24:12 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Born in Mexico, raised and slaughtered in the United States, South Central LA”


5 posted on 09/12/2013 10:29:12 PM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All
The lawsuit argues that the rule violates the U.S. Constitution because it forces meat producers to provide information about their products, ...

Will somebody please explain how forcing meat producers to provide information about their products violates the US Constitution? I think that Congress reasonably has the power under the Commerce Clause (Constitution's Clause 3 of Section 8 of Article I) to lawfully require such information on meat products, at least for interstate commerce. Insights welcome.

On the other hand, since the Founding States made the Constitution's Sections 1-3 of Article I to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, I don't see where so-called "independent federal regulatory agencies" like the USDA have the constitutional authority to tell anybody to do anything. After all, since Sections 1-3 essentially clarify that Congress has a monopoly on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not, by delegating regulatory powers to non-elected bureaucrats, Congress is wrongly protecting federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters imo.

6 posted on 09/12/2013 10:46:43 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Like all highly detailed and extensive government regulations, it will have perverse effects.

National operators will follow the law, with expenses passed on to consumers. There will be great incentive for low-level operators (think of our migrant community) to simply lie or sell product without it. The Government will not have the ability, or will, to police everyone, so an underground system will develop.


7 posted on 09/12/2013 10:50:45 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Another job creation program courtesy of BO - 500,000 immediate openings for government inspectors. No experience required, minorities only need apply, includes vacation, fully subsidized health care and generous retirement plan.


8 posted on 09/12/2013 11:09:42 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As long as it keeps me from buying meat from China I am happy.


9 posted on 09/12/2013 11:20:30 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As long as it keeps me from buying meat from China I am happy.


10 posted on 09/12/2013 11:20:30 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I wuza born in the U.S.A.! I wuza fed grass and hay! I wuza slaughtered yessir day! For that you are gonna pay!

By Bruised aka The Bossy


11 posted on 09/12/2013 11:30:21 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Does the law simply say “where it was born”? If so that means they’d have to say what county and state it was born in. While they’re at it they should be required to how many siblings it had by different faters.


12 posted on 09/12/2013 11:37:48 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What if the cow was born in Kenya and they made a phony birth certificate saying it was born in Hawaii. How do the Feds prove the true place of birth?


13 posted on 09/13/2013 2:19:34 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What’s next, birth certificates for cows? BOHICA! A whole new government agency! Regulate this industry till we’re all forced to eat dog from China!


14 posted on 09/13/2013 2:24:22 AM PDT by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Nothing to see here, keep moo’vin along.


15 posted on 09/13/2013 4:32:12 AM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
As long as it keeps me from buying meat from China I am happy.

Just a few days ago the gov. has now allowed chickens raised and processed in China to be imported.
No label w/ country of origin required if the chickens are processed in China.

Chicken tenders anyone?

16 posted on 09/13/2013 4:53:42 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Snort! Once you get the skin off them they are all angus!


17 posted on 09/13/2013 7:04:06 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson