Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bracing For A Battle, Vermont Passes GMO Labeling Bill
NPR ^ | 24 April 2014 | Eliza Barclay and Jeremy Bernfeld

Posted on 04/24/2014 10:39:01 AM PDT by Theoria

The Green Mountain State is poised to become the first to require food companies to label food products containing genetically modified ingredients.

Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin tweeted he will sign a bill state lawmakers passed Wednesday mandating that foods with GMOs be labeled as having been produced with "genetic engineering." The bill would also make it illegal for foods with GMOs to be labeled "all natural" or "natural."

While Maine and Connecticut have already passed GMO labeling bills, those bills contain clauses that keep them from going into effect until surrounding states pass similar rules. Vermont's bill would go into effect on July 1, 2016.

For the past few years, consumer advocates have been ratcheting up the pressure on states and the federal government to require labeling, arguing that information about GMOs is essential if we're to make informed decisions about what food to buy.

Meanwhile, the food industry has resisted the idea of labeling, arguing that GMOs are safe and labeling costs would be passed onto consumers.

But recently, they changed their tune a bit. As we reported in February, a food industry coalition representing farmers, seed companies and other food producers who rely heavily on GMO ingredients said they support voluntary labeling standards. And they asked the Food and Drug Administration to outline what they might look like.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which led that coalition, responded sternly to the passage of the Vermont bill. "It sets the nation on a costly and misguided path toward a 50-state patchwork of GMO labeling policies that will do nothing to advance the safety of consumers," the association said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Food; Gardening; Hobbies; Society
KEYWORDS: fda; food; gmo; vermont
'Congressman Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., recently introduced a bill that would create a federal voluntary GMO labeling plan. But it would also outlaw state rules like Vermont's that require GMO labels'

Bill would have FDA decide on labeling genetically modified food[FR]

1 posted on 04/24/2014 10:39:01 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Basically, this is 99% of all canned or otherwise processed foods these days. That is my take on it.


2 posted on 04/24/2014 10:42:54 AM PDT by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

GMO my ass. Vegan agenda ping.


3 posted on 04/24/2014 10:46:34 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theoria

So? Just stop supplying food products to Vermont. After all, it’s a small market anyway.


4 posted on 04/24/2014 10:47:17 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Every food needs to be labelled as man has tinkered with the genetic code of plants and animals since we started to practice agriculture. The only difference is we can specifically target specific components of the genetic code.


5 posted on 04/24/2014 10:48:43 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

My only thought on the subject is if China for Gods’s sake will not take GMO corn I sure don’t want that stuff going in my system. We are going to try to start growing most of our own veggies from heritage seeds.


6 posted on 04/24/2014 10:52:42 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

While this is something I’d rather the free market work out, Big Gov has recently made food decisions like allowing our chicken to be processed in China. Until we get Big Gov out of our food production, this is what we’re stuck with.


7 posted on 04/24/2014 11:02:44 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

My only thought on the subject is if China for Gods’s sake will not take GMO corn


Huh, that is your test? That is just political maneuvering. I thought people had thinking caps here.

You want non gmo, go buy organic. Don’t let the politicians and media do you thinking for you................


8 posted on 04/24/2014 11:06:36 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Ding ding ding!

If I ran a food company, I would not be changing the labels of my products nationwide to cater to a tiny population like Vermont. I’ll just sell my product elsewhere.


9 posted on 04/24/2014 11:30:10 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

One thing I want even less than GMO food is government bringing its force into the matter. Let free people sort it out.


10 posted on 04/24/2014 12:08:39 PM PDT by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

“Huh, that is your test?”

Yeh its a good test. The Chinese eat stuff that nobody will eat. They feed their fish poop. Crikes if they won’t eat GMO thats all you need to know.


11 posted on 04/24/2014 2:24:50 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Prehistoric man altered plants through natural breeding and selection. These are traits that already existed in nature and man chose to selectively grow more of them for his needs. None of the sequences are man-made, only man-selected. Genetics are very complex and even a small single difference in phenotype (appearance) could be the result of hundreds of changes in genotype (code).

Man has never before physically altered the code itself and we know far less about biology than we think. One change in code that we think only makes a fruit brighter might also cause hundreds of other negative changes that we cannot understand or test for. There are also many possible unintended consequences of introducing man-made genes into nature.

They're playing with fire for profit IMO

12 posted on 04/24/2014 3:44:47 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

I don’t see how any major company will avoid labeling, just to avoid the possibility of a lawsuit because one of their suppliers has included some GMO in some feed to their animals or something.

On the other hand, it would be hilarious if Vermont passes this, and in a month everybody In Vermont walks into their grocery store and thinks they moved to the old Soviet union, finding the shelves bare because national chains can’t be bothered to do state-by-state labeling, so they simply stop selling. I imagine Vermont isn’t exactly a huge market to begin with.


13 posted on 04/24/2014 8:04:01 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson