Posted on 10/28/2014 1:50:54 PM PDT by bigtoona
I am going to be a poll watcher in Charlotte on Tuesday and I just asked this question to our local GOP rep..
I heard about that strange and stupid rule after the Fall of America in Nov. 2012. I hope someone with influence is fighting this or at the least trying to publicize it far and wide.
Why, all of a sudden, is there formal acknowledgement of vote fraud that has, and stands to, benefit the DIMS?
I mean a reliable RAT House Organ—the Washington Post—has even admitted to it.
Are they just rubbing our noses in it in advance of next Tuesday?
That they would be called racists if they didn't?
No there is not massive voter fraud. Face it. There really doesn’t need to be. America is not Conservative anymore. It’s not like there is this huge tide of Conservatism they need to thwart. Quite the contrary. America is racing Blue as fast as it can. However, with computer technology there is now election fraud but no one cares.
Supremes denied a hearing.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-373.htm
Amazing... well, not for a third world country.
“...The RNC, inexplicably, decided to agree to a consent decree before a Democrat-appointed judge rather than fight the claims....”
*******************************************************************************************************
It’s been known as the STUPID PARTY from before this 1982 STUPID acquiescence and continuing to this day.
bttt
Class action lawsuit. I am directly harmed by fraudulent elections. I’m sure I’m not the only one.
This is another rationale for a third party, which would not be bound by this consent decree.
“The RNC, inexplicably, decided to agree to a consent decree before a Democrat-appointed judge rather than fight the claims.”
In fact, very explicable: the Republicans are wusses.
The hands of the GOP are tied, but not other entities. If only political parties had “standing”, then a grant to the Libertarian Party, earmarked to fight voter fraud, might do something.
I recall hearing much the same thing.
All the more reason why there should be a third party,
and leave the old Rebulican GOPe saddled with the old 1882 court decision.
Right now , the best change is to have the Repubbies fade away by court order,
since they can't persue either the truth, or justice in elections . !
The Republican Party has been castrated, and found to be spineless recently, and unlikely to change by legal intimidation.
“Its not who votes but who counts the votes that matters”, STALIN!
I don’t question that “some” consent decree was signed on this general subject by the pubs and the dims.
I do question that there is not “another way” for the Pubs to “police” elections.
Like so many other things, Boehner is acting squishy on big tough issues (those requiring balls) for some reason as are many other top pubs.
Seriously, it does “appear” sometimes that Obama and Jarrett have the goods on the Republican leadership. What else is there to explain their spinelessness the past 7 years. Same goes for the Supreme Court.
Debevoise said that since most minority voters support Democrats, the RNC still has an incentive to suppress minority votes.
He dismissed the idea of voter fraud and extended his own supervision of the case until 2017.
In March, the 3rd Circuit issued its affirmation of Debevoise’s decision.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/
Just another good reason (out of the 10,000 other ones)to dump the GOP and start a new party not bound by the consent decree.
Jebbie Bush/ John Boehner, Rinse&Repeat, J. McCain = Poster Boys of The Party W/O a Ball.
Cruz/ Walker/Paul/Greg-Abbot = Poster Boyz for The Courage & Freedom Party.
And thirty year old court rulings stay forever? Challenge it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.