Skip to comments.
Judge Judy: Don't Prejudge Kavanaugh Accusations (tr)
TMZ ^
| September 24, 2018
Posted on 09/24/2018 7:05:49 AM PDT by EdnaMode
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
If a similar case was presented in Judge Judy's court, there wouldn't be anywhere near enough evidence to convict. The witnesses wouldn't even corroborate her story.
1
posted on
09/24/2018 7:05:49 AM PDT
by
EdnaMode
To: EdnaMode
2
posted on
09/24/2018 7:07:23 AM PDT
by
allendale
(.)
To: EdnaMode
people need to slow down and hear the evidence in the Kavanaugh/Ford showdown Well, as soon as Ford comes up with any evidence, I'll be sure to take this advice.
3
posted on
09/24/2018 7:07:47 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The MSM is in the business of creating a fake version of reality for political reasons.)
To: EdnaMode
IT would never ever see the light of day in a court of law. It would never pass a grand jury.
Very odd that Judge Judy doesn’t say that.
4
posted on
09/24/2018 7:08:16 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(“A communist is a dead man on furlough.” Lenin)
To: EdnaMode
I don’t take Kavanaugh’s side. I take the side of reason, logic, the law, and the American spirit. Pretent Hillary is the president and Obama is the nominee. I consider both dangerous to the nation, but these charges would be just as absurd in that case.
This is not about Kavanaugh. This is about the wholesale destruction of the process itself.
To: EdnaMode
There are only two people who know what did,and didn't happen,thirty eight years ago and they both have a strong motive to lie.The “evidence” I've heard regarding this alleged incident combined with the circumstances surrounding the letter's release and comment as well as Kavanaugh’s obviously strong character lead me to strongly,*strongly* suspect that she's either lying or very delusional indeed.
6
posted on
09/24/2018 7:11:47 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
To: EdnaMode
The problem is that she is talking about judging on the basis of a hearing rather than on the evidence, which does not exist. And on this hearing, there is no presumption of innocence and no right of the accused to confront the accuser.
This hearing should not have been allowed.
7
posted on
09/24/2018 7:12:27 AM PDT
by
djpg
To: cuban leaf
This is not about Kavanaugh. This is about the wholesale destruction of the process itself. What Rat Party Headquarters is doing worked in Alabama and if it works here too....
8
posted on
09/24/2018 7:13:54 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
To: EdnaMode
Prejudge?! There’s not enough there to even do that.
9
posted on
09/24/2018 7:14:11 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
To: EdnaMode
slow down and hear the evidence We did slow down thanks to Feinstein and the Dems gamesmanship, now for hearing the evidence? Do we really believe Ford will testify Thursday.
10
posted on
09/24/2018 7:14:23 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: EdnaMode
Assuming that a commie Democrat is lying (or that millions of them are lying), is not pre-judging.
The sun rises in the east; commie Democrats lie.
11
posted on
09/24/2018 7:14:39 AM PDT
by
meadsjn
To: EdnaMode
And Judge Judy would give the accuser a huge tongue lashing.
To: Gay State Conservative
AL Trump supporters would not follow up, and now they have a Democrat senator.
To: EdnaMode
The named witnesses have already come forward and said it never happened. Therefore, we are not prejudging the case without evidence.
14
posted on
09/24/2018 7:19:35 AM PDT
by
odawg
To: cuban leaf
This is about the wholesale destruction of the process itself. That, sir, is the bottom line. It is a street fight brought to us by leftist terrorists.
The committee is not designed to operate as a court of law. Committee members are entitled to form an opinion of the gossip as they see fit, which opinion is often void of logic but almost invariably consistent with their political leanings.
However, if there is credible evidence any of the claims constitute false statements to the Senate, the R's ought to come down with the full weight of the law, at least for the sake of posterity.
15
posted on
09/24/2018 7:22:43 AM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(Obama's "Remaking of America" continues apace in the absence of effective political opposition.)
To: EdnaMode
You disappoint me greatly, Judge Judy. I thought you were above all this crap.
16
posted on
09/24/2018 7:28:19 AM PDT
by
laweeks
To: EdnaMode
Oh, hell yes I prejudge it. On motive alone I prejudge it.
17
posted on
09/24/2018 7:31:11 AM PDT
by
Migraine
(<)
To: EdnaMode
I don’t recall asking for your opinion, female “judge”.
18
posted on
09/24/2018 7:33:49 AM PDT
by
chris37
("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
To: EdnaMode
The judge is off on this. The scheme played by Democrats is blatantly obvious to any reasonable viewer.
19
posted on
09/24/2018 7:34:27 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
To: EdnaMode
.. we don't know enough to form an intelligent opinion on who's telling the truth and who's not. Hey Judy, here's a clue for free:
here's your ass (!)
and third base is over thataway > > >
20
posted on
09/24/2018 7:34:42 AM PDT
by
tomkat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson