Posted on 04/14/2019 7:27:14 AM PDT by Drew68
GRAND HAVEN, Mich. A man now living in Indiana is suing his parents after he says they destroyed his valuable porn collection.
FOX 17 is choosing to identify the plaintiff in this story as "Charlie," as this is a civil case without any associated criminal charges.
The case dates back to October 2016 when, according to a lawsuit filed this week, Charlie moved into his parents' home in Grand Haven after going through a divorce from his wife. Charlie apparently stayed for 10 months in their home, doing housework in lieu of paying rent. He was asked to leave after police had to be called to the house in August of 2017 for a domestic situation.
His parents allegedly traveled in November 2017 to his new place in Indiana to drop off possessions he had left at their home.
Allegedly missing from the items they brought: Charlie's massive pornography collection.
Charlie says his parents told him that they destroyed the entire collection. A collection that consisted of over 12 moving boxes full of movies.
...snip...
His father, according to the lawsuit, responded, "Believe it or not, one reason for why I destroyed your porn was for your own mental and emotional heath. I would have done the same if I had found a kilo of crack cocaine. Someday, I hope you will understand.
Charlie's father said in one email that his son was allegedly kicked out of high school and college for selling porn to other students. Saying in the documents, "I also warned you at that time if I ever found pornography in my house again, I would destroy it."
Shipping was out of the question .. the cards had no huge value then?
Her too. You can add Jenna Jameson and Janine Lindemulder as well.
"They burned my literature, man. Do you know who else burned literature, man? The Nazis, man!" Hmm... I might work up some sympathy if there actually were a market for faded, sticky VHS tapes but I'm unaware of one. Anyone who knows is welcome to enlighten me. Bit of trivia here: did anyone know that Marilyn Chambers was twice a Vice Presidential candidate? Yes, Vice President. I swear I'm not making that up.
My family was a little different. Never threw out anything. I got magazines and newspapers from the 20s on up. So much stuff.
I still have my matchbox car collection and comics.
They would have had much value in less than three years later. I had all of the major Yankees, several of each player, and many of the greats like DiMaggio, Ford, Williams, Maris, and Mantle. Shipping was out of the question, my Father was an E-6 and if you remember back then that pay was lower than the poor.
Funny stuff. Was that Al Bundy in the chief justice role?
Legally the argument would be the same as if he collected Hummel figurines, which his parents despised.
Much of the argument could center around what was involved with the domestic dispute that resulted in them asking him to leave. Whether or not that dispute was over porn, after that time their destruction of his property could be seen as vindictive by the court.
At best in the 1900 era it was erotica and maybe some nude photos. The photographer may have made it worth while
That's a big IF, and even if the court finds for the landlords on that point, there's still the destruction of the tenant's personal property to be adjudged.
Bringing his porn collection onto the landlord's property could be judged as sufficient grounds for eviction, but that doesn't give the landlord the right to destroy the tenant's personal property.
Red state or blue state, shouldn't matter. The landlords took it upon themselves to destroy the personal property of their tenant without notice, permission, or any legal justification whatsoever.
You're just not allowed to do that in this country.
If I were in the parents' shoes, I'd feel the same, but I would never take it upon myself to destroy another's personal property because I found it morally distasteful.
That's just all kinds of wrong.
So sad. My brother collected every DC and Marvel comic from 1964 to 1967. He must have had a couple of footlockers full of them. He grew bored with them in his mid teens and threw the whole lot away.
The value would be ridiculous today.
I had originals of almost every comic made by Marvel between 1977 and 1984 ish.
IIRC, some university had a large vintage porn collection so they could study the furniture, lamps, fabrics, etc. from bygone eras.
Or so they said.
And that's why they become so valuable over time. People throw them out without ever considering their future value.
They're only valuable because everyone threw theirs away! Even then, the market for stuff that Boomers find valuable will never be what it was. If you held on to anything past 2008, whether comic books, baseball cards, or Fender guitars, you missed out. That train has left the station. The upcoming Millennial and Gen-Z folks will never place much value on any of this stuff and as Boomers start dropping like flies, estate sales are going to be full of old comic books. Few people are going to want them.
Not to give you a sad, but there was a cheap flat rate for shipping seabags.
I sent home sets of China for every female member of my family and a component stereo system. Except for the stereo speakers I found oversized seabags for all of it.
Don’t try to ship grenadine in seabags no matter how its cushioned.
Dunno about that. The Marvel movies have had a significant upwards impact on the price of comics from the previous era. If you have an original #1 of a comic that Marvel makes into a movie, you’ve just been enriched.
It’s scaring me a bit too. The only porn stars I can name are Jenna Jamison and Traci Lords and whatserface who got screwed by Avenatti.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.