Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
why are so many women evolutionarily inclined to be liberal/socialist/communist/fascist?
my observation is that many more women than men seem to fit these categories, which imho differ only in degree.
my own conjecture:
women have been evolved to submit to the force and power of authority. in prehistory, women, having generally less strength and less weight than men, have taken follower social status as the primary way in which both they and their offspring maximize their survival and reproduction chances.
the us constitution upholds minimal government. minimal government is antithetical to maximum force and maximum power.
thus, the us constitution is often belittled as "unimportant" "irrelevant" "wrong" or "patriarchical" by many women.
many ancient cultures apparently implicitly understood this and thus usually did not give women any chance to assume a position of ruling a group.
one of the few ancient cultures that survives is islam. islam does not seem to offer women any leadership roles or any rights equal to those of males. yet, many women support islam, even while asserting feminist ideology.
the evolutionary attraction of women to force and power is the only explanation that i can come up with that resolves the dichotomy of women supporting a culture which denies womens' rights.
by allowing women equal or better political power, therefore, it could be construed as opening the gates of modern civilization to the islamic, socialist, or communist strains of cultural barbarianism.
i am not certain whether a solution exists, but perhaps someone should find a solution quickly, before modern civilization is overrun.
before the 19th amendment passed, the destructive effect of women on modern civilization was not a significant problem.
what am i missing?
I’ve never been like that so I don’t fully understand it. I have zero female friends.
Because they don’t think, they feel, so they are easily misled.
They are more likely to be ruled by emotions.
Communism superficially sounds so nice.
Short answer: they want to be taken care of. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s just as natural that men want to take care of women.
They are weak.
The really want a nuclear family- father, mother, kids but have been told from birth “I am woman, hear me roar” and “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” so they fight their actual biological needs and find themselves unable to survive alone.
The state steps in and offers to fill that vacant spot and they jump at the chance.
My theory is they buried themselves in student loan debt for easy degrees that let them party and have sex and abortions at will and when they graduated and got $30,000 a year jobs as teachers and social workers and public defenders they realized they were never going to pay off their six-figure loans they went insane with hate.
Whatta bout the other 56 genders?
The leftists have learned how to play on emotions.
Men are more likely to be driven by logic.
generally, more women than men value security over liberty.
the limiting case of valuing security over liberty guaranteed by a constitutional republic is a dictatorship, communism, or some other autocracy.
therefore, generally, more women than men value autocracy over our current form of government, which is a constitutional republic.
therefore, if there are more women than men and a tiny majority of women favor security over liberty, and this tiny majority of women, presuming the number of women voters is roughly equal to the number of men voters, votes counter to the continued existence of a constitutional republic.
All the liberal women I know, and you’re right it’s most, don’t think about it. They have no power of reasoning.
And fatherless children often learn that.
Combine the two and you’ll see it match up with observable society.
Emotional thinking.
Like most other ‘Rats.
you got it. emotions vs logic
> My theory is they buried themselves in student loan debt for easy degrees that let them party and have sex and abortions at will and when they graduated and got $30,000 a year jobs as teachers and social workers and public defenders they realized they were never going to pay off their six-figure loans they went insane with hate.
let me guess... at about the same time that they lost their good looks (presuming they were graced with good looks to begin with), unless they were born without good looks, in which case the avenue of finding a suitable beta male to marry, or an alpha male to marry and then divorce and collect alimony, would be unavailable to them...
They have replaced the need for men with government. They can have absolute power over any kids they decide to have. If they were married, they would have to share control and compromise.
First, I am a woman. Two points:
1. Women are generally stupid and vacuous. My sister is a lib Dem and buys a $10 Starbucks coffee every day; mocha and all the goodies. I would never do that.
2. Out of necessity, women have had to place their trust in the man who impregnated them, in order to protect their children. He must be as strong and fast as possible; in today’s world, that means connections and power.
Now I have forgotten the original question. Hoping I’m posting on the correct thread! LOL
I think you have it backwards.
Ask yourself why Communism seems always to be with us.
It’s because half of us are women.
To pretend that men and women are the same and interchangeable is idiotic. Men and women are complimentary, as the left hand is to the right. There is much overlap, but nature, or God if you like, is not wasteful. Your hands, together, are more capable than two of the same one would be.
Traits of male and female are not, of course, exclusively tied to ones sex, either. Some men are more like most women, and some women are more like most men.
The liberal/socialist women I’ve know took a particular pleasure in nagging, haranguing, and manipulating others to mold their behavior to their liking.
Most of them have been neurotic and irrational as well.
Because no matter what they say, they still depend on someone else to take care of them. Individualism is a concept they reject. Group think is what sustains them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.