Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questioning false positive COVID tests in hospitals
American Thinker ^ | 09/10/2021 | Carl Henry

Posted on 09/10/2021 7:00:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

There's a strong possibility that many of the alleged COVID cases in hospitals are not COVID at all but are, instead, the result of the hospitals using the PCR test, which has a high failure rate.  My family has firsthand knowledge about the serious problems with the PCR test's reliability.

One of our kids broke a bone very badly around a month ago and ended up in the hospital.  The hospital did a PCR test and found her to be COVID-positive.

What the department in the hospital that conducted the test realized is that the kid had just had pre-op testing done and that the pre-op department — in the same hospital — ran a more accurate test specifically made only to detect COVID.  That test was negative.  Also, the kid is on ivermectin as a preventative due to some underlying medical issues, so she was unlikely to have the virus.

The sad thing is that, even they'd been informed about the more accurate test, presumably with the hospital records being updated to reflect that fact, a couple of the nurses kept telling my wife over the phone and in person that the kid had the COVID.  It felt as if they were trying to convince us of that fact.

The kid wasn't made to wear a fear-mongering mask and was not quarantined in a special area of the hospital.  She even spent two days in the cardiac ICU due to the underlying condition triggered by the pain of the break.  Six days in that place, and the kid still didn't catch COVID.

So we have experienced proof that that hospital is doing the PCR test despite definitive proof that it's inaccurate.  It's tempting to believe they're doing this because there are financial benefits associated with COVID patients.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: covid; falsepositive; pcrtest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2021 7:00:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I had covid two weeks ago and tested positive for COVID at CVS.

The next Saturday (after 5 days of no symptoms) I tested again at CVS. Did not touch the swab to my nose, did not breathe on the swab or make contact with it in any way.

It came back positive.


2 posted on 09/10/2021 7:02:17 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t the PCR test the one that can’t even tell the difference between covid and the flu?


3 posted on 09/10/2021 7:05:51 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BTW, the benefits to Hospitals are very real. Read this article:

https://www.hfma.org/topics/news/2020/07/the-new-round-will-pay—50-000-per-covid-19-admission—compared-.html

There are probably lots of hospitals keeping in COVID wards patients who are not sick. Even the NIH had to admit that 40% of their supposed COVID patients were admitted to the hospital for something else. See here:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15700668/half-covid-hospitalisations-patients-positive-after-admission/

Does this mean that 40% of the diagnosed cases in the U.S. could be false? Makes one wonder...


4 posted on 09/10/2021 7:06:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

BTW, the benefits to Hospitals are very real. Read this article:

https://www.hfma.org/topics/news/2020/07/the-new-round-will-pay—50-000-per-covid-19-admission—compared-.html

There are probably lots of hospitals keeping in COVID wards patients who are not sick. Even the NIH had to admit that 40% of their supposed COVID patients were admitted to the hospital for something else. See here:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15700668/half-covid-hospitalisations-patients-positive-after-admission/

Does this mean that 40% of the diagnosed cases in the U.S. could be false? Makes one wonder...


5 posted on 09/10/2021 7:06:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A neighbor of mine who works in the Healthcare field shared with me a test performed by administers of this process.

The staffers administering the tests chose to submit testing swabs which had not even been used in actual testing. They then filled out the forms with ficticious name and data. The test came back positive.


6 posted on 09/10/2021 7:08:10 AM PDT by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's tempting to believe they're doing this because there are financial benefits associated with COVID patients.

You bet your donkey!

7 posted on 09/10/2021 7:08:53 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There's a strong possibility that many of the alleged COVID cases in hospitals are not COVID at all but are, instead, the result of the hospitals using the PCR test, which has a high failure rate.

Ya think?! Geez, welcome to the party, pal.

8 posted on 09/10/2021 7:10:52 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wen you pay for something (like the FedGov does) - guess what? You get more of it./


9 posted on 09/10/2021 7:11:25 AM PDT by ASOC (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Even the NIH had to admit that 40% of their supposed COVID patients were admitted to the hospital for something else.”

So either the tests are inaccurate and they’re using them to gin up the numbers, OR the hospitals are the breeding ground and infection vector for COVID spread...


10 posted on 09/10/2021 7:22:09 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patriot torch

So boy and girls (and you too Buehler), what is the CONFLICT OF INTEREST for these new covid testing services that sprouted up like weeds? The more tests that are positive the more covid hysteria and the more people get tested across longer periods of time. THAT ALL MEANS MORE PROFITS.


11 posted on 09/10/2021 7:22:27 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: struggle

WOW you must have very strong germs! You definitely need to wear a mask FOREVER, it seems!


12 posted on 09/10/2021 7:23:55 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“It’s tempting to believe they’re doing this because there are financial benefits associated with COVID patients.”

That is the understatement of the year. Unbelievably, we have a number of PCR test defenders on this forum. The CDC itself is withdrawing it’s own PCR only testing protocol after the first of the year and is now “encouraging” labs to test for the flu concurrently when PCR tests are done. This is being done because millions of people who were told that that they had Covid who actually had the flu.

The question in my mind is why is the CDC waiting until after the first of the year? A high percentage of people who believe they have naturally acquired immunity from having Covid actually do not. They were quarantined and given inappropriate treatment. When it killed them their deaths were called Covid deaths and the hospitals received approximately an additional $35,000 of government blood money. The lies keep compounding and complicating the situation. There is no doubt that this crap has largely been about politics and money and not public health.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html


13 posted on 09/10/2021 7:25:44 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

OTOH, the “something else” might very well be caused by the vax which is sorely being under recorded.


14 posted on 09/10/2021 7:35:49 AM PDT by bgill (.Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: struggle

last year a relative went to her doctor’s office for a test. she filled out the paperwork and sat to wait until she was called. much too much time went by and she had somewhere else to be so she left without being tested.

doctor’s office called few days later and told her she tested positive.


15 posted on 09/10/2021 7:37:51 AM PDT by wny ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Interestingly, your article is about false positives and includes the claim that the PCR tests are inaccurate.
This claim is, however, based upon a link that doesn’t address false positives but instead talks about false negatives. Even so, the false negatives are only in the brief period of about five days following disclosure. IOW, the linked article doesn’t support the article’s claim.


16 posted on 09/10/2021 7:52:53 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

A positive PCR does not mean that a person is infected, sick, or infectious.

It might.

It might not.

A PCR is a rotten diagnostic test which is why it was meant for epidemiological use.


17 posted on 09/10/2021 8:01:00 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: struggle

You have super Covid!


18 posted on 09/10/2021 8:09:53 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Impossible. Scientists, Doctors, teachers, police, and lawyers never lie.


19 posted on 09/10/2021 8:11:11 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
Unbelievably, we have a number of PCR test defenders on this forum.

FreeRepublic has CCP and Deep State operatives posting, they are not "concerned" patriots.

...

The question in my mind is why is the CDC waiting until after the first of the year?

CONTROL. Hence the push for the "Not-Actually-A-Vax." The 'Rona goes away with the PCR test. The narrative must be maintained to divert from the truth. The response is a scam designed to steal elections.

THINK


20 posted on 09/10/2021 8:25:29 AM PDT by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson