Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rooting Out Planetary Imposters: Three “Exoplanets” Turn Out To Be Stars
scitechdaily.com ^ | MARCH 20, 2022 | ENNIFER CHU, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Posted on 03/20/2022 9:34:46 PM PDT by BenLurkin

In a study published on March 15, 2022...MIT astronomers report that three, and potentially four, planets that were originally discovered by NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope are in fact misclassified. Instead, these suspected planets are likely small stars.

The team used updated measurements of planet-hosting stars to double-check the size of the planets, and identified three that are simply too big to be planets. With new and better estimates of stellar properties, the researchers found that the three objects, which are known as Kepler-854b, Kepler-840b, and Kepler-699b, are now estimated to be between two and four times the size of Jupiter.

A fourth planet, Kepler-747b, is about 1.8 times Jupiter’s size, which is comparable to the very largest confirmed planets. But Kepler-747b is relatively far from its star, and the amount of light it receives is too small to sustain a planet of its size. Kepler-747b’s planetary status, the team concludes, is suspect but not entirely implausible.

Rooting out planetary imposters was not the team’s initial goal. Niraula originally intended to look for systems with signs of tidal distortion.

When combing through the Kepler catalog, he came upon a signal from Kepler-854b that appeared too large to be true.

The team then took a second look at both the star and the planetary candidate. As with all Kepler-detected planets, Kepler-854b was spotted through a transit detection — a periodic dip in starlight that signals a possible planet passing in front of its star. The depth of that dip represents the ratio between the size of the planet and that of its star. Astronomers can calculate the planet’s size based on what they know of the star’s size. But as Kepler-854b was discovered in 2016, its size was based on stellar estimates that were less precise than they are today.

(Excerpt) Read more at scitechdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; exoplanets; jenniferchu; kepler699b; kepler747b; kepler840b; kepler854b; science; xplanets

1 posted on 03/20/2022 9:34:46 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

what is the penalty for impersonating planets these days?


2 posted on 03/20/2022 9:35:48 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They came for Pluto, and I said nothing.


3 posted on 03/20/2022 9:36:31 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The real calamity is Ph. D,’S Get paid for this witb no responsibility for their work, good bad or indifferent. No so in the provate sector. One mistake and you’re fired.


4 posted on 03/20/2022 9:50:53 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks BenLurkin.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·
· post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·
X-Planets

5 posted on 03/20/2022 9:53:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fungi

There is no such calamity here, so knock it off.


6 posted on 03/20/2022 9:54:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

How many exoplanets are there?
To date, more than 4,000 exoplanets have been discovered and are considered “confirmed.” However, there are thousands of other “candidate” exoplanet detections that require further observations in order to say for sure whether or not the exoplanet is real.
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/faq/6/how-many-exoplanets-are-there/


7 posted on 03/20/2022 9:55:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Don’t know, but I’ll be damned if I’ll ever stop calling Pluto a planet.


8 posted on 03/20/2022 9:58:51 PM PDT by ammodotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Strange things happen in the Cosmos. After a certain point some stars actually SHRINK in diameter when mass is added . Other stars blow up to little bits because the hydrogen added reaches a certain point where fusion can take place. That turns the entire surface into a thermonuclear bomb.
9 posted on 03/20/2022 10:14:04 PM PDT by Nateman (Xi Jinping is the most diabolical enemy Americans has ever had. 🍊)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

But exoplanets claim to be planets and we must believe them.

Otherwise it would be transplantphobic.


10 posted on 03/20/2022 10:21:57 PM PDT by RedMonqey (Fu%k the Ballot box. Now the Cartridge Box)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The 'wobble method' is still the best way to look for exoplanets because it tells you the mass, not the size, of a planet. The 'transit method' only tells you its size which can be deceptive. Jupiter would be a star if it had 80 times its mass, but its size would not be much larger because it would also be denser.

And Pluto is not a planet. Never was.
11 posted on 03/20/2022 10:27:36 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (Democracy is two dead Democrats and a Republican voting who's brains are for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Gosh, I never thought of it that way. So True!


12 posted on 03/20/2022 10:31:24 PM PDT by Equine1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

I get that Pluto is a dang dog. EOS.


13 posted on 03/20/2022 10:33:14 PM PDT by Equine1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

I think in most parts of our galaxy it’s a misdemeanor.

$250 dollar fine plus court costs and /or 30 days in the hoosecow.


14 posted on 03/20/2022 10:59:28 PM PDT by jmacusa (America. Founded by geniuses. Now governed by idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Dark Matter. Everything in astrophysics can be explained by referring to dark matter, the universal fudge-factor.


15 posted on 03/20/2022 11:30:46 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Yeah? Well who do I see about these worthless time shares now?


16 posted on 03/21/2022 3:48:12 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Lol- guess I gotta stop self identifying as an exoplanet


17 posted on 03/21/2022 6:35:36 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I’ve never trusted these numbers, or the process used to get them. It requires the planets and stars be PERFECTLY aligned with earth, so that we can detect the shadow.


18 posted on 03/21/2022 9:10:57 AM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson