Drew Barrymore the feminist prostrated before an enthroned man in a dress is a sight to behold

The scene between Drew Barrymore and Dylan Mulvaney was like something out of an Arthurian legend where Guinevere clasped at the hem of her knight’s tunic, or a film that hearkens back to Hollywood’s earliest era where the gentle housewife fell in line with the 1950s iron-fisted husband:

Women are now getting on their hands and knees to show solidarity with a man who has lived as a woman for less than a year.

Truly the sneakiest trick the patriarchy ever pulled.

pic.twitter.com/a9bA1V3oew — Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 14, 2023

A woman on her knees, pleading with a man as he sits on his throne of superiority; the spectacle all seemed rather misogynistic if you ask me. (One could reasonably expect a kissing of the signet ring would be next.)

Predictably, this event set conservative outlets abuzz because of its sheer ridiculousness — Barrymore advertises herself as a feminist and advocate for women. However, the text from the tweet above got me thinking: is this switcheroo really the “sneakiest trick the patriarchy ever pulled”? I’d argue it’s not.

Why I find this particular instance of prostration so gross is because it isn’t the first time females have been majorly played by domineering, and legitimately toxic males. Ever wonder how the “right” to murder children in the womb wound up as a rallying cry for women all over the place?

I read about this the other day and it made me think of when you go on YouTube, you can watch old episodes of Entertainment This Week from about 1982. Back then, it was nice to have a weekly TV newsmagazine devoted to entertainment news and keep reasonably abreast with what was going on with TV shows and movies and music, etc. Flash forward all of these years later and these people are basically wanting to live their bizarre lives and viewpoints with all of us and Drew Barrymore’s behaviour yesterday is a good example of this disturbing trend.

“when entertainers were considered to be on the lowest rungs of society.”

They never left that position in my mind.....they’ve just been successful at convincing the weak minded sheeple that they’re something special.

In medieval and Renaissance eras they were called court jesters and were the lowliest of rank of the King’s court......they have over and as far as I’m concerned......they just have too damn much money and are dangerously low on intelligence.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.