Posted on 02/18/2024 4:46:51 AM PST by MtnClimber
The most important thing you will see this week is this interview of Mike Benz by Tucker Carlson: Benz is with the Foundation for Freedom, which tracks government censorship. In this interview he explains how our government rigged elections abroad and has now, through DHS (Department of Homeland Security) and CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), censored online communications, noting that its most substantial censorship involved blocking and limiting any critiques online respecting the government’s responses to COVID-19 and the security of the 2020 election.
It's a well-detailed account that I urge you in the strongest terms to view.
In short form, here’s a summary, but it cannot do this chilling interview complete justice:
THREAD:
@MikeBenzCyber
speaks with
@TuckerCarlson
Mike Benz outlines how the government established a permanent domestic censorship office under the pretext of countering misinformation. and disinformation. Initially considered for the State Department, CIA, and FBI, the censorship office found its home in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), utilizing the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). DHS classified elections as critical infrastructure and online misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as cybersecurity attacks. The original goal of countering Russian disinformation shifted to suppressing domestic dissent and the populist movement led by President Trump. Examining the 2020 election's censorship strategy, Benz details CISA's collaboration with Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Council through the Election Integrity Partnership. The censorship consortium employed coercive tactics, leveraging its deputized status to pressure tech companies through government threats. A critical element was the seven-month pre-censorship campaign before the 2020 election. The consortium compelled social media companies to introduce a new "delegitimization" violation, targeting content challenging faith in mail-in ballots, early voting, and ballot drop boxes. The overarching goal was narrative control, preventing doubts about a Biden victory...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Attempts to hide the truth, but it only partially worked with low-information people.
Unfortunately, low-information people get to vote. Several times in some precincts.
Very enlightening and disturbing interview
Reread the Declaration of Independence.
Far too much of it is sounding way too familiar.
It is our duty…
Lots of People that didn’t vote got to voter
Lots of people that shouldn’t have voted got to vote; Illegals, felons, dead people and non-existent people.
Yes, they practically have.
Nonsense. We American citizens still have absolute freedom to talk about ██████, ████████, or ████████.
big question is... are there any actual laws against violating our rights on a national scale?
by this i mean the specific crime and punishment for violation.
if so, please drop a link
“Has Our Government Erased the First Amendment?”
That’s why the Demoncrats invented their “misinformation” aka “Disinformation” propaganda. To shut down anything that may challenge their lies.
“misinformation. and disinformation.”
Two communist terms if ever I’ve heard them.
The Tucker Benz interview is the most compelling hour I’ve spent in a very long time
The “government” already repealed the US Constitution with the imposition of the panoply of “civil rights” legislation in the 1870s and 1960s. At least in the 1860s/70s they changed the US Constitution; in the 1960s they just ignored it and the “courts” went along with the scheme because they were 1) cowards and 2) communists.
Regardless of the fact that the FBI can be prosecuted for conspiring with Old Twitter for violating Constitutional free speech rights, Twitter’s former owner can be prosecuted at the same time.
Federal courts have upheld the Justice Department’s enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 and it’s protection against race discrimination in privately-owned businesses due to the fact that they represent “public institutions”. Race discrimination by these arena owners is illegal because it represents discrimination by the overall community.
Do you support or oppose this legal precedent?
Twitter owns and runs a “public institution”. Applying the Civil Rights Act’s precedent to the 1st Amendment has not been tested in court. How do you think this Supreme Court would rule? .....Hmmmmm?
Protection against speech discrimination is constitutional. Protection against race discrimination is only legal.
1913 was the knife in the throat with the 16th and 17th Amendments.
One of the most important interviews on the web. Unfortunately, it is too long for addled brains to handle.
And 19th amendment. Women have no business voting. They are emotionally compromised beings.
Good grief!
Feldman’s next question will be: “Did the japs really bomb Pearl Harbor?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.