Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The rhyme and reason of Sarah Palin's endorsements
The Washington Post's The Fix ^ | June 4, 2010 | Chris Cillizza

Posted on 06/04/2010 9:40:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

After a stretch in which an endorsement from Sarah Palin was considered a rarity, the former Alaska governor has become something of an endorsement machine as of late. In the past week alone, she has endorsed four candidates, ranging from a tea party contender for Senate in her home state of Alaska to the GOP establishment favorite for Iowa governor.

Palin has backed both clear winners and decided long-shots; she's weighed in on behalf of "mama grizzlies," but an extra X chromosome doesn't necessarily mean an automatic endorsement (see Hutchison, Kay Bailey). Some candidates (such as former Redskins tight end and Washington Senate hopeful Clint Didier) have enjoyed her backing long before their primaries; another, Fox News commentator Angela McGlowan, got the Palin nod via a tweet mere hours before polls closed on primary day.

The recent barrage of endorsements also represents a shift from Palin's strategy in March, when she released a target list of 20 House districts, but did not name favored GOP candidates in those races.

We took a look at Palin's recent endorsements and found that if there's any rhyme or reason to them, it's that they're as idiosyncratic and unpredictable as the former governor herself.

That said, Palin's endorsements do break down into a few rough categories, which we've outlined below:

1. Outsiders/tea party candidates: Palin has always touted herself as a candidate running outside the establishment; it comes as little surprise, then, that a fair number of the candidates she's backed this cycle have tended to be political "outsiders" (or have at least been running under that mantle).

Ophthalmologist Rand Paul (R) in Kentucky is the most prominent example in this category.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2010polls; 2012; angrypalinbots; keywordspam; keywordwars; mcpalin; onepercenters; palin; palin4fiorina; palin4graham; palin4hatch; palin4herself; palin4mccain; palin4murkowski; palinbots4mccain; palinendorsement; palinforfiorina; palinformccain; palinfreeperping; palinistas4mccain; palinlovesrinos; paultards4911truth; paultards4jihad; paultards4kokesh; polls; purists; rabscuttlespamming; rinopalin; rinos; romneybots; ronpaulsucks; sarah4sarah; sarahmcpalin; sarahpalin; saveussarah; senoritasarah; wapospendorsements; waronsarah; whenpaultardsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last
Nobody's endorsements work 100% of the time, Chris.
1 posted on 06/04/2010 9:40:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How is Obama’s record on endorsements?


2 posted on 06/04/2010 9:46:23 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah drives the left crazy. That’s a good thing.


3 posted on 06/04/2010 9:47:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("A Republic, If You Can Keep It" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Waiting for the inevitable posts from PDS sufferers and 100% purists complaining about Sarah Palin’s two bad or questionable endorsements.

Counting down:

4, 3, 2, 1 .....


4 posted on 06/04/2010 9:50:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We took a look at Palin's recent endorsements and found that if there's any rhyme or reason to them, it's that they're as idiosyncratic and unpredictable as the former governor herself.

LOL, Leftists are so predictable. Twenty thousand years of the same old crap.

Rhyme and reason? Try the original Constitution and beating Hillary.

Like you don't know already ::snort ::

5 posted on 06/04/2010 9:51:15 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Yep, apparently Sarah needs the approval of people on this site before endorsing anyone otherwise all hell breaks loose


6 posted on 06/04/2010 9:52:55 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The comments from the Moonbats pretty much sums it up....they’re afraid of this lady.

Typical comments from the moonbats

1. Snarky
2. Calling her a “MILF”
3. “need to ‘take her out’”
4. She’s a dummy
5. She’s just in it for the money

yadda, yadda, yadda.


7 posted on 06/04/2010 9:54:12 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
"How is Obama’s record on endorsements?"

Hahaha! Don't even go there! LOL He's got the reverse Midas touch on endorsements, foreign policy, disasters, legislation and on and on...

8 posted on 06/04/2010 9:56:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here is an updated list of the endorsments made by Sarah Palin so far:

- JP
9 posted on 06/04/2010 9:58:55 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("Every time a Democrat mocks Sarah Palin, an independent gets its wings." - JP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267

Sadly, there are people here that act the same way towards a strong conservative woman. I hope their gruel is wormy and as thin as can be in the BHO reeducation camps.


10 posted on 06/04/2010 9:59:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Take a look at the keywords ... someone’s not a happy camper.


11 posted on 06/04/2010 10:03:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

That’s a big pile of chits for Sarah.


12 posted on 06/04/2010 10:04:11 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Take a look at the keywords ... someone’s not a happy camper.

Ha!

Probably a bitter, miserable Paulbot or even a Mythbot who sees their candidate fading into irrelevance.
13 posted on 06/04/2010 10:06:12 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

keywords

The children and cult members are having their free time
before being tucked into bed.


14 posted on 06/04/2010 10:08:28 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Personally I have not agree with all her endorsements..BUT..I do think I see what she doing and if so she far more political savvy than people know ... she building a broad base of political alliances, a wide range of people in her political debt

It the flip side of becoming a big tent moderate...

You do not have to a be a big tent moderate to win..

You just got to get big tent moderates to be in your political debt and collect when you make your move....

She been studying Reagan...

15 posted on 06/04/2010 10:10:44 PM PDT by tophat9000 (It ain't about Black... It ain't about White...It's about a Red...Trying to take our rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

>sees their candidate fading into irrelevance.>

ain’t that the truth.

The big laugh are the ones who think their candidate with 5% or 15% with a few days to go will win.
they are in the land of the unicorns


16 posted on 06/04/2010 10:12:19 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

So far Sarah is 6 wins to 3 loses according to JP’s list.


17 posted on 06/04/2010 10:14:37 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
Personally I have not agree with all her endorsements..BUT..I do think I see what she doing and if so she far more political savvy than people know ... she building a broad base of political alliances, a wide range of people in her political debt

I think it is even more simple than that.

With the exception of McCain who she endorsed BEFORE J.D. got into the race, she is simply, for the most part, supporting the most conservative candidate in each race that she honestly believes can win.

A few of her endorsements were more of a long-shot, but mostly, I believe, she is endorsing those who are most conservative and most probable for winning.
18 posted on 06/04/2010 10:47:39 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445; SoConPubbie

Vaughn Ward for U.S. Congress in Idaho would have won
if it wasn’t for the fringe bunch that went into a smear campaign. It is the only way the fringe can win.


19 posted on 06/04/2010 11:12:51 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Try the original Constitution and beating Hillary.

Do you think Obama was the wrecking-ball to weaken conservative defenses (as if; what a pussy) by 'hitting the ground, running', thereby opening the door for the Hildabeast's return (deal made with the 'Devil and Cigar Hider', Inc.)?

Boy, it makes sense to me. Mr. Inexperience pushes his thick head through the (first black) ceiling so that Mrs. Incorrigable passes through with fat cankles, rehabilitated hubby, and fugly daughter? He was likely told: "Go left as far as you can, whatever you can get will be great, but when Hillary pops up, she'll look like George Washington compared to you and America will be ready for a 'conservative' like Hillary- she wins handsdown. "You screw things up best you can now, hear, boy?"

What about Mr. "We're dying down here" Carville taking Sarah's political threat seriously with "Drill, baby, drill"(he ain't stupid) as a challenge (who but HE, should ever use "baby" in any damn sentence, damnit!) by coordinating an oil blow-out that would be used to nullify her contention for office but good, but, not realizing how much enviornmental damage would occur, is now trying to look like a victim instead of perpetrator? Why the SWAT teams decending on the Gulf, you ask? Cover the tracks, baby, cover the tracks.(Think I hate the Snake, you think right)
Grapes of Oil Wrath

Obama (as he heads back from the field with the sun beating down upon him): "This bag of cotton is getting pretty heavy, wish I hadn't listened to them at all." "Some'll think I let my people down, but I really wanted to change things to help the little people and I believed them, but now realize it was only a quest for power that they lusted after."

"Two more years of shucking bales and it'll all be over like planned, but man, I'm already tired and thirsty as hell." "What's that I see- at the end of the row?" "Isn't that the woman made fun of by so many a late-night comedian? "Is that a ladle of water in her hand?" "What gives grandma, another mirage?"

"Barry, drink slowly, there's more and you're very thirsty." "I've come to replace you, but not in the fields. My mission is to tear down the plantation and free all who live here by tearing down that which binds so many- those who have become accustomed to handouts which are not of their own effort, but that of others who can no longer afford the luxury. Machines can pick cotton, people can build machines. We all can build a future of untold greatness together if "the owners" do not stand in the way."

Barry: "You make a lot of sense, Sarah. Hey, would you like to know who took out the oil well?"
Sarah: "Not right now, we can look into that later, right now, you need some rest and maybe something to eat."
Barry: "Mind if I throw the black vote your way in '012?"
Sarah: "That would be nice, but only if you're not running. I mean, how silly would that look?"
Barry: "You bet."
Sarah: "You betcha!"

20 posted on 06/04/2010 11:39:43 PM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
she is endorsing those who are most conservative and most probable for winning.

Nailed it. She'd like nothing more than a team she could coach to victory and get results (a win for America). No easy task with today's media conjob and billionare antis funding our defeat. A real leader will not flinch, whatever the odds, with truth in her quiver.
(That's right, I said it, 'her')

21 posted on 06/04/2010 11:54:55 PM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Also those that ask for her endorsement. She made that very clear at the outset. She will not endorse anyone that has not asked her for an endorsement. she does not stick her nose in where its not wanted.

Mitt used that condition against her in VA and NJ and Mass when he strongly hinted his support was on condition that they would not ask for Palin’s.

22 posted on 06/05/2010 1:00:27 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
After a stretch in which an endorsement from Sarah Palin was considered a rarity, the former Alaska governor has become something of an endorsement machine as of late. this is because the candidates are now seeing the power of Palin and are flocking to her to seek her endorsement. Its simple at the beginning of the year the establishment with Mitt in the lead cheering them on had a narrative that Palin was divisive. that she would do more harm than good for a candidate because she would get the left all bent out of shape. therefore the word went out to avoid Palin. However after the book tour some of that thinking changed. then came Ny23rd and the response to Palin's endorsement was out of this world. then other underdogs started to call on Palin and when she endorsed these underdogs they surged in the polls. Now the floodgates are open and Palin power is a known fact and now the candidates are beating down the door to get her endorsement. It's been a long year for Palin she has done what few other politicans have ever done. she is now the kingmaker in the GOP and the elites know it. You don't hear anyone dissing Gov Palin from the elites anymore do you?
23 posted on 06/05/2010 1:07:59 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
the comments at the post crack me up. they show their stupidity on so many levels. a lot of them think Palin’s endorses have all lost. they compare her to hitler and then say know one cares about her thoughts if she has any.

Its like reading 6th graders talking about calculus. they simply are clueless lefties. Which gives me hope that they are going to be surprised very much come NOV 2012. They have swallowed the marxist’s talking points hook line and sinker. They can not even fathom that Palin has tremendous support in the country.

Hopefully they will believe their own lies enough to try to get her nominated like an operation choas from the DNC think she will be an easy defeat for them.

Little do they know or understand.

24 posted on 06/05/2010 1:23:02 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is this what passes for political analysis at the Washington Post? That is sad.


25 posted on 06/05/2010 6:41:30 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Probably a bitter, miserable Paulbot

Gee, I wonder who that might be?

*rolls eyes*

26 posted on 06/05/2010 6:45:33 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"Waiting for the inevitable posts from PDS sufferers and 100% purists complaining about Sarah Palin’s two bad or questionable endorsements."

Is it now the 'rule' that you must be a certified worshipper of Gov. Palin to comment on these stories? Maybe it is not only the progressives that find that whole free speech thing a little troublesome.

27 posted on 06/05/2010 6:59:29 AM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde; 2ndDivisionVet; Sarah Barracuda; ak267; Josh Painter; SoCalPol; tophat9000; ...
Is it now the 'rule' that you must be a certified worshipper of Gov. Palin to comment on these stories? Maybe it is not only the progressives that find that whole free speech thing a little troublesome.

Ding! Ding! Ding!

We have a winner folks!

The first obligatory PDS Sufferer Post for this thread, complete with the usual false slur concerning Palin Supporters being either Cult members or Worshippers!

It took a while, but one finally poked it's head up.

You just can't beat the irony!

It just doesn't get better than that for proof!
28 posted on 06/05/2010 9:45:28 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
So, the answer to my very simple question was obviously "yes". I get a rant about being PDS from you in response. I think it is pretty clear whom around here is deranged.

Don't worry, all you folks that got pinged to my remarks, I'll never read or post on one of your Palin worship threads again. If you believe that you are doing this potential candidate any service by belittling anyone deciding to closely examine exactly what she is as a political figure, think again.

29 posted on 06/05/2010 11:13:11 AM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; SoConPubbie; 2ndDivisionVet

I’d like to note/save this article with proper keywords, but take a look at them!

Who the heck has been crapping around with the keywords?


30 posted on 06/05/2010 12:34:46 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Is this what passes for political analysis at the Washington Post? That is sad.

In the world of Chris Cillizza and the WaPo editors it is.

31 posted on 06/05/2010 12:37:13 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why does a reporter care who a housewife endorses?


32 posted on 06/05/2010 12:40:24 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

She drives a fair amount of FReepers crazy, too. Also, a good thing.


33 posted on 06/05/2010 12:41:07 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Josh Painter does a great job of deconstructing this liberal gibberish at his blog:

WaPo liberals try to parse Gov. Palin's endorsements

Josh's last paragraph is the heart of it and explains exactly what Palin is trying to do. The libs at WaPo should read it. They might learn something. Then again, maybe it's better if they don't. :)

34 posted on 06/05/2010 12:45:47 PM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
If you believe that you are doing this potential candidate any service by belittling anyone deciding to closely examine exactly what she is as a political figure

Then perhaps you should start closely examining her. There's a difference between that and mindlessly bitching. We see enough of it already here.
35 posted on 06/05/2010 12:56:36 PM PDT by Uncle Ivan (Alea iacta est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

You’d better knock it off with the keyword spamming.


36 posted on 06/05/2010 1:46:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde

The problem is not with someone who may disagree with an endorsement by Ms. Palin. The problem is that rather than urging support for their candidates, eg. Hayworth, Devore, et. al, the primary focus is on Sarah Palin who must be a useless RINO because she has endorsed someone who in their infinite wisdom is a RINO, in some cases without substantiation. Such names as “Princess”, “Precious”, are demeaning, over the top, and are certain to bring a response from those of us that admire Ms. Palin. It comes across that the real agenda is trashing Sarah Palin rather than supporting the supposed “true conservative”. Nobody wants to talk about the two Oklahoma senators (nobody questions the bona fides conservatives) that endorsed Fiorina, so why the obsession with Palin?

These same people who criticize her relentlessly, bunker themselves when it comes to who they believe might be the best person to lead conservatism going forward. That’s because they are apparently afraid to defend their choice of potential candidates, or there is universal recognition that he/she doesn’t have a chance.

Ms. Palin is politically astute and her conservative credentials are without question.


37 posted on 06/05/2010 2:38:26 PM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Were we right or what?

*High fives*

38 posted on 06/05/2010 2:42:14 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
if you believe that you are doing this potential candidate any service by belittling anyone deciding to closely examine exactly what she is as a political figure, think again.

Here's what you said to start off this discussion:

Is it now the 'rule' that you must be a certified worshipper of Gov. Palin to comment on these stories? Maybe it is not only the progressives that find that whole free speech thing a little troublesome.

Is there any chance you could be just a little bit objective and honest here and admit that it is just a tad bit hypocritical of you to slander Palin supporters as hypocritical and then criticize others who take you to task for that mischaracterization and claim it is somehow limiting your free speech?

Once again, you're posts are going a long way of proving my point of the behavior of PDS Sufferers.
39 posted on 06/05/2010 3:01:31 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
You’d better knock it off with the keyword spamming.

Oh Rabs!

Caught in the act!

Ha!

I'll bet you don't even know how bad this makes you look!

Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
40 posted on 06/05/2010 3:02:52 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Good grief I just looked at his keywords.. talk about demented.


41 posted on 06/05/2010 3:04:26 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; onyx; Lakeshark; Virginia Ridgerunner; TitansAFC; SoCalPol; Clyde5445; bwc2221; ...
You’d better knock it off with the keyword spamming.

Get a look at the keyword spamming our good-buddy Rabscuttle385 has done to this thread.

What do you wanna bet he doesn't have the guts to admit how stupid and childish this behavior is?
42 posted on 06/05/2010 3:06:24 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Arizona Carolyn

What do you expect from those who support Ron Paul, the idiot who said Obama is not a socialist.

Ron Paul who said ,o lay off of Obama and the oil spill

and Ron Paul who trashes Israel and suports the IslamOfascists


43 posted on 06/05/2010 3:11:27 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you, Admin Moderator.


44 posted on 06/05/2010 3:35:50 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Grow up troll.


45 posted on 06/05/2010 3:37:01 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Were we right or what?

This is really mind-boggling to me.

How somebody can act so immature like this and expect that

1. He won't get caught.
2. Anybody would take him seriously once this behavior got outed.

46 posted on 06/05/2010 3:46:43 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Lakeshark; rabscuttle385

Whenever you see the keywords loaded with crap, notify the admin moderator like I did in post #30 to ask who’s been crapping the keywords. I actually add keywords of my own for reference to retrieve articles, and for this one I added “WaPoSPendorsement” and just added “rabscuttlespamming”.


47 posted on 06/05/2010 3:56:40 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; rabscuttle385

He sure is a sour little guy. I think he has issues with women and grown-ups. Typical Paultard/Baldwinite malcontent.


48 posted on 06/05/2010 3:59:55 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: onyx; SoConPubbie; Lakeshark; rabscuttle385; Arizona Carolyn

I think some of those keywords are pretty funny. :)


49 posted on 06/05/2010 4:25:03 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: onyx

yep.....


50 posted on 06/05/2010 4:29:47 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson