No way Jose.
Not in a million years.
No. She will be Sarah Palin. She has the potential of being a great President, IMO, but she will not be Ronald Reagan.
To draw the comparison diminishes both Palin and Reagan, IMHO.
The rare combination of her political skills, her genius for management, her ability to unite disparate entities in pursuit of a common goal, and her heartfelt belief in both the Constitution and the Bible make her the exceptional candidate, and happen to do so at the one point in history where, without Palin alone assuming those reins, America and her Dream become but a sad, tragic memory.
Anything else said on the topic is just bullsh*t, and America knows it. That's why she's the mega-star that she is. Her time has come, and not a moment too soon.
;-/
Until, that is, you remember that Reagan's son Michael has said the same exact thing about Sarah on many occasions, and will do so again in a few short days time as part of the Make America Great Again rally.
So those who don't want to admit it can suck on that for a while.
8^D
Palin is NO Ronald Reagan and she would admit as much. She is the best thing going right now only because there isn’t much else and because our expecations have been lowered by the likes of turds like Obama.
No.
Like Ronald Wilson Reagan, (Ave Ronaldus Magnus!), the statement has been given: “I will run for President, if the people want me to run for President.”
The order has been given! GRIZZLIES UP!
Sarah Palin is in the SAME position Ronald Reagan was in in 1978.
Only three people could have been elected prez in 1980—Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy or Reagan.
In 2012 there are only three people who can win—Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, or Sarah Palin.
That’s it. You are either with us or you are doomed to lose more ground and time to the Marxists.
Reagan was the first president i ever voted for...and the ONLY one for whom I had any degree of affinity.
Palin is Reagan in that regard...she speaks, as he did, what all Americans think and would like to say.
As Reagan did, she walks the talk as well.
I look forward to casting my vote for her.
No bias the way this was written, eh?
Of course she brings up what was said about Reagan because it's pertinent. One of the main reasons she is compared to Reagan is precisely because "they" have said she can't win, just as "they" said he couldn't win.....and for much the same reason.
It doesn't mean Sarah Palin assumes she's the second coming of Reagan, FGS! That's just stupid!
No.
No.
And therein lies the whole basis of the article. Some liberal's opinion of what Sarah thinks of herself. Never mind that she never actually said that.
The fact that some anonymous liberal thinks that she thinks this, is reason enough to rush this gushingly putrid article to press.
Sarah needs your help here. Don’t abandon her.