Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s Potentially Self-Destructive Support of Birther Bill (They're "concerned")
Color Lines ^ | April 20, 2011 | Jamilah King

Posted on 04/20/2011 9:36:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

It looks like Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is prepared to do what Arizona’s Jan Brewer announced earlier this week that she couldn’t: Pass a birther bill that would require presidential candidates to prove their U.S. citizenship. In Jindal’s case, it’s a bill that could threaten his own presidential ambitions and potentially make it much harder for him to appear on his own state ballot if he ever chose to run.

“It’s not part of our package, but if the Legislature passes it we’ll sign it,” press secretary Kyle Plotkin told the Times-Picayune on Tuesday.

The package that Plotkin is talking about is House Bill 561, which was introduced last week by two Republican lawmakers, Sens. Alan Seabaugh and A.G. Crowe. The bill would require federal candidates — including candidates for the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives — who want to appear on Louisiana ballots to file an affidavit proving their citizenship, reports the Times-Picayune. That affidavit would also need to be accompanied by an “original or certified copy” of the candidate’s birth certificate.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer made headlines on Monday when she vetoed a similar bill that had passed the state legislature. “I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for president of the greatest and most powerful nation on Earth to submit their ‘early baptismal or circumcision certificates,’ among other records, to the Arizona Secretary of State,” Brewer said after the decision. “This is a bridge too far.”

But for a growing number of states, it’s a bridge that doesn’t reach far enough. At least a dozen similar bills are being considered by legislators in various states, including Missouri, Texas, Georgia and Tennessee. Daily Kos has a rundown of all the birther bills that are spreading across the nation.

Julianne Hing has written before about how in nearly every case, the bill’s backers deny that the bills are politically motivated. Yet critics call the bills thinly veiled attacks on President Obama and his black roots, despite the Hawaiian officials who have repeatedly said that Obama was born in the state. Most recently, billionaire mogul Donald Trump has joined the fray and vowed to pay for his own independent investigation into the president’s citizenship.

Jindal’s support for the bill seems puzzling, but it probably shouldn’t be. The governor’s full name is Piyush “Bobby” Jindal and he is himself the first generation son born to Indian immigrants. Yet he’s already thrown his support behind other controversial GOP efforts, such as the 14th Amendment rollback that would strip citizenship away from U.S.-born children of immigrants. At the time, Jindal’s spokespeople claimed that he’d still be able to retain his citizenship because his mother was a permanent resident when she gave birth to him. But it’s a messy situation nonetheless, and one that could keep the GOP star, who was once pegged for a presidential run, off of his own state ballot.

*******

About Us

Colorlines.com is a daily news site offering award-winning reporting, analysis, and solutions to today's racial justice issues.

Colorlines.com is produced by a multiracial team of writers whose daily reporting and analysis serves as a leading voice on a broad range of issues including politics, immigration reform, the economy and jobs. We cover pop culture and Capitol Hill with equal zeal, and we offer readers the opportunity to take action on these issues through our Action channel.

Colorlines.com has been building a home for journalism in service to racial justice since 1998, first as a print magazine and then as a daily news site. Colorlines.com is published by the Applied Research Center (ARC) a racial justice think tank using media, research, and activism to promote solutions. We consider racism a structural problem, and that perspective informs our journalism. Colorlines.com features dynamic, hard-hitting coverage of the day's stories as they unfold, synthesizing complicated stories with multimedia features and breaking open new conversations with investigative reporting. Colorlines.com covers stories from the perspective of community, rather than through the lens of power brokers.

ARC and Colorlines host the bi-annual Facing Race conference, the largest multi-racial gathering in the country for organizations and individuals committed to change. 2010 Facing Race highlights included keynote speaker Melissa Harris-Lacewell, guest speaker FCC Commissioner Clyburn, artist performances and networking parties, the release of the study "Better Together: Research Findings on the Relationship between Racial Justice and LGBT Communities," the launch of Drop the I-Word campaign challenging the use of the dehumanizing term "illegals," and opportunities to network with the Colorlines editorial crew.


TOPICS: Louisiana; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: allegedlyamerican; allegedlyhawaiian; birthcertificate; certifigate; jindal; louisiana; naturalborncitizen; obama; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Comments?
1 posted on 04/20/2011 9:36:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is Jindal a NBC?


2 posted on 04/20/2011 9:41:25 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not a real comment, unless questionably rhetorical questions count: why would Democrats be so concerned about having to prove their candidate’s eligibility in the way Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower did if there weren’t fears on their side that what is coming from our side (and from Hilary’s, long ago) is true?


3 posted on 04/20/2011 9:41:35 PM PDT by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If enacting legislation which enforces Constitutional provisions really is bad for a political career then America is in deep trouble.
4 posted on 04/20/2011 9:42:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Jindal is probably not a natural born citizen - his parents were only in the country 6 months when he was born. As far as I know, no state requires the governor be a natural born citizen. California certainly didn’t with Schwarzenegger.


5 posted on 04/20/2011 9:44:47 PM PDT by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Agree with gov. Jindal. No person should be able to run for president without satisfying constitutional stipulations.


6 posted on 04/20/2011 9:46:37 PM PDT by Bridge_toofar (Trump/Bachmann in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s fun to read an article that defeats its own premise.

IF Jindal is not qualified to run for president, why would it be good to ignore that fact?

And IF a “birther” bill would prevent him from running, and he signs it into law, isn’t that a selfless act on his part?


7 posted on 04/20/2011 9:47:35 PM PDT by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“If enacting legislation which enforces Constitutional provisions really is bad for a political career then America is in deep trouble.”

America IS in deep trouble...


8 posted on 04/20/2011 9:48:07 PM PDT by piytar (Talga Vassternich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Jindal was born in Baton Rouge to parents who were here legally, and were legally under U.S. jurisdiction (i.e., not under diplomatic immunity, not soldiers of a foreign power at war against the U.S.). That means he's legally a U.S. citizen according to case law (U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark) and the obvious interpretation of the 14th Amendment.

(Whether he's an NBC eligible to run for President may, or may not, be a different question. Federal case law is crystal clear that he's a citizen, though.)

9 posted on 04/20/2011 9:48:26 PM PDT by Campion ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for president of the greatest and most powerful nation on Earth to submit their ‘early baptismal or circumcision certificates,’ among other records, to the Arizona Secretary of State,”

Is this true? I heard the blowhard John Gibson blabbering about this today. If this is true, what the heck would we want a circumcisn record for? That just makes us look dumb. BC makes total sense, but the other stuff?? Come on.
10 posted on 04/20/2011 9:50:46 PM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Heck, maybe Bobby Jindal is a politician who puts the Constitution ahead of political ambition.......Who would have guessed that of a politician!


11 posted on 04/20/2011 9:52:19 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Jindal’s both parents were in US legally on immigrant visa which is also known as green card. It is a permanent resident visa and a precursor to applying for citizenship.

There is no clearcut definition of “natural born citizen”.
And you betcha it won’t happen during the Obama regime.


12 posted on 04/20/2011 9:52:50 PM PDT by Bridge_toofar (Trump/Bachmann in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

My understanding is that he is NOT, in which case he will end any Presidential ambitions by signing this bill.

That would mean he’s a rare politician who puts principle before ambition. Wow.

If that happens, there are plenty of other ways he could serve our nation and be rewared for doing so. And I’ll back him to the moon if that happens.

PS No state to my knowledge has an NBC requirement for governor, so that twist in this “article” (propaganda piece) is pure, well, propaganda.


13 posted on 04/20/2011 9:54:20 PM PDT by piytar (Talga Vassternich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well AMERICA is in trouble. The Democrips do not want the truth to come out because it will take so many down with “The One” and Rebloodlicans do not want it brought out because afterwards AMERICA is going to be standing there asking why they did NOTHING.

I hope Trump runs and wins as a small “i” independent. He can then charge every president, judge, senator and congress person as far back as legally allowed with perjury.

This one grand event would take our country back from the elitist scumbags in both gangs. R and D.

We can’t predict the weather but we sure can stop the fall.

Whoever—
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.


14 posted on 04/20/2011 9:54:42 PM PDT by plainolamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: plainolamerican

OK, if liberals think that the birther bills are a JOKE...

....why are they so ‘CONCERNED’ or RELIEVED about it NOT passing?

Shouldn’t the attitude be “Sure, pass the birther bills, it’s a joke anyways.” INSTEAD OF “Oh thank you for not passing the birther bill”.


15 posted on 04/20/2011 9:59:30 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Right. My question was: Can Jindal run for POTUS?

Of course... legal scholars would be crawling out of the woodwork to say, “No!”


16 posted on 04/20/2011 10:03:52 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Yet he’s already thrown his support behind other controversial GOP efforts, such as the 14th Amendment rollback that would strip citizenship away from U.S.-born children of immigrants.”

Wow. I can pretty much guarantee Jindal has done no such thing, since there are no GOP efforts to strip citizenship from the children of *legal* immigrants.

You know you’re reading a left-wing open-borders rag when you see the phrase “illegal immigrant” replaced with simply “immigrant”.

Personally, I’ll be very surprised if Obama can’t produce an undetectable forgery BC by this point in time.

The real issue is that he is not “natural born” because his father was neither a US citizen nor a legal immigrant. The Constitution is quite clear that only someone born of two citizens can be POTUS. A BC showing BHO Sr. as the father does not make him eligible.


17 posted on 04/20/2011 10:04:42 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Jindal is not a natural-born citizen.

A permanent resident is still an alien resident and is subject to deportation from the United States. A citizen can never be deported from the United States.

from wiki:
a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR), has been officially granted immigration benefits, which include permission to reside and take employment in the USA. The holder must maintain permanent resident status, and can be removed from the United States if certain conditions of this status are not met.


18 posted on 04/20/2011 10:06:03 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

WOW! Country before ambition.


19 posted on 04/20/2011 10:11:04 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bridge_toofar; TigerClaws; blueplum
Jindal’s both parents were in US legally on immigrant visa which is also known as green card.

Incorrect. His mother was on a student visa and his father was on a "student's spouse" visa. They were not permanent residents.

They later used Jindal's anchor-baby status as leverage to get green cards and ultimately naturalization.

20 posted on 04/20/2011 10:26:00 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson