SCOTT TRYST TWIST

BED HOPPER: Scott Peterson, in court recently, "has a need" for adultery, a relative says. - Pool photo

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 6, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Scott Peterson might have had up to six extramarital flings, and defense lawyers will use his alleged bed-hopping to debunk claims he killed his wife to be with gal pal Amber Frey, sources told The Post.

The legal counter-punch would try to prove Peterson had no reason to kill for Frey, a 28-year-old massage therapist, because he was happy just running around behind Laci's back, according to defense sources and others familiar with their strategy.

Authorities have theorized that Peterson, a Modesto fertilizer salesman, murdered Laci and their unborn son, Connor, so he could clear the way to take up with Frey.

But if prosecutors push that theory, Peterson's defense is ready to admit the Frey affair was merely one of many.

The Fox News Channel yesterday quoted a family relative, who said Scott Peterson had at least three affairs.

"He has a sexual problem and has a need to sleep with other women," the relative told Fox.

Lead defense lawyer Mark Geragos was not available for comment yesterday. A DA spokesman conceded that the new allegations could be a wild card at Peterson's trial.

"It's hard to say which way that would land," said John Goold, chief deputy DA. "Both sides could have different arguments on the issue."

The series of affairs, if ever used as evidence, would surely be a slippery slope for one side or another, said Fox News Channel legal editor Stan Goldman.

"The prosecution should probably not put all its eggs in that basket, that Amber Frey was the sole motive for killing his wife," said Goldman, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. "If it turns out that he had many other girlfriends, then Amber Frey becomes less and less important."

"But on the other hand, the prosecution could still argue that it wasn't one woman that was the motive to kill his wife, but rather that it was a world of women," Goldman added.

Pregnant Laci, 27, vanished on Christmas Eve while Scott, 31, allegedly went on a solo fishing trip in San Francisco Bay.

The remains of her and Connor washed ashore in April near San Francisco, leading to Peterson's arrest days later.

Yesterday was supposed to be the sixth day of testimony in Scott Peterson's ........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, Calif. (CBS) A police officer said Tuesday that he saw a bucket and mops in plain sight in front of Scott Peterson's home as officers began investigating his pregnant wife's disappearance.

The defense testimony is considered a counterpoint to a possible prosecution argument that Peterson mopped the kitchen after killing Laci Peterson on the night of Dec. 23.

Evers said there was no smell of bleach or other cleaning agents in the house, reports CBS News Correspondent Manuel Gallegus.

Evers testified on the fifth day of a hearing to determine if Peterson, a former fertilizer salesman, will stand trial on two counts of murder for the death of his wife and unborn son.

Peterson, 31, told police he last saw his wife the morning before Christmas as he left to go fishing near Berkeley. He told them he returned to their Modesto home late that afternoon, shortly before family members reported Laci Peterson missing.

The bodies of 27-year-old Laci Peterson and her unborn son washed ashore along the San Francisco Bay in April, about three miles from where her husband said he was fishing.

On Friday, the couple's housekeeper, Margarita Nava, testified that she mopped the kitchen floor Dec. 23 with water and Pine-Sol. She said she put the mop outside to dry but put the bucket on top of the washing machine with rags that needed to be laundered.

On Monday, Scott Peterson's defense attorneys challenged the type of DNA analysis done on a hair found in his boat, saying the technique is too unreliable to be used in court.

Prosecutors believe the hair, found in a pair of pliers in the boat, could be from Peterson's wife, Laci. An FBI crime lab supervisor testified during the preliminary hearing last week that mitochondrial DNA from the hair matched a gene swab taken earlier this year from Laci Peterson's mother, Sharon Rocha.

Defense witness William Shields, a biology professor from the State University of New York at Syracuse, testified Monday that while mitochondrial DNA testing can be useful, it is not as precise as other types of DNA testing.

Mitochondrial DNA cannot specifically identify an individual, but if compared with samples taken from a family member, it can show the statistical likelihood that a hair or other tissue came from a certain person.

Peterson is charged with murder in the deaths of his 27-year-old wife and the baby boy she was carrying. The preliminary hearing is to determine if he will stand trial.

There is no evidence Laci Peterson was ever in the boat before her death, and prosecutors are expected to show that she did not even know about the vessel.

Mitochondrial DNA — a molecule that is much smaller than the more familiar nuclear DNA that is used to reveal a person's genetic makeup — helped identify victims of the World Trade Center attack. It can be extracted from hair and bones when little else remains of a body.........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, Calif. - (KRT) - Police became suspicious of Scott Peterson within hours after his wife was reported missing, first when he seemed to trip up on his alibi, then when he smoothed out a small rug that was scrunched up against the back door, a detective testified Tuesday.

While the prosecution is counting on Peterson's initial statements and actions to bolster its case, the defense is expected to use the police's reaction to further its own contention - that police became so focused on Peterson from the start that they neglected to adequately pursue any other leads in the murder of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son.

The defense also pointed out Tuesday that when Detective Jon Evers filed his police report he wrote that there was "nothing out of the ordinary to indicate a struggle or violence had occurred" at the Peterson home. Evers also acknowledged under cross examination that he did not smell any cleaning products when he entered the home - potentially undermining a police theory that Peterson mopped up evidence that day.

Two more detectives plan to take the stand this morning in the sixth day of Peterson's preliminary hearing, which will determine whether the 31-year-old fertilizer salesman will stand trial on two first-degree murder charges. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant, was reported missing Christmas Eve. Her body and the body of their unborn sun washed up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay in April.

One of the star witnesses against Peterson - his former mistress Amber Frey - also could testify as early as Wednesday afternoon. The 28-year-old massage therapist from Fresno could shed light on the only motive suggested so far - that Peterson's feelings for her were so strong that he killed his pregnant wife to be with her.

Tuesday's testimony in Stanislaus County court again focused on Peterson's behavior during his first contact with police.

Evers said Peterson had told him he had spent that day fishing in the San Francisco Bay and came home to find his wife gone and the leash still on the dog in the yard. As he walked through the house with Peterson and a fellow officer, the other officer asked Peterson what he had been fishing for that day. Evers didn't hear Peterson's answer, but Evers said that the fellow officer took him aside a moment later and whispered, "Scott didn't know what he was fishing for."

Evers also said he noticed a throw rug "scrunched" up against the back door jamb, and asked Peterson, "Is that always like that?"

"He said, `Oh, no, the cat and the dog must have been playing,'" Evers testified.

With the toe of his shoe, Peterson then pulled the rug away from the door, Evers said. Although the significance of the rug wasn't mentioned, those in the courtroom were left to wonder whether something heavy, such as a body, had been dragged across it.

But Peterson's defense lawyer, Kirk McAllister, asked Evers why he never mentioned the rug in his police report.

"I was in a hurry when I prepared that," he said, adding that he told detectives about it the next day.

McAllister continued to downplay the significance of the rug when he asked Evers, "Was there a lump under it, like some weapon?"

McAllister also tried to contradict the police theory that Peterson mopped up his crime scene. Evers testified that he noticed a wet mop and bucket along the walkway near the front door, but he conceded he noticed no wet floors when he went through the house after 5 p.m. Christmas Eve. And contrary to previous reports that police smelled bleach in the house, Evers told McAllister he didn't smell any.

"You smelled no odor of any kind - chlorine, bleach or any other cleaning agent?" McAllister asked.

Detectives who are scheduled to take the stand Wednesday will likely be asked whether they smelled bleach, either on that first night or in the next couple of days while Peterson was still living in the modest ranch-style house.

Acting on their suspicions, police asked Peterson that night to take them to his office, which was attached to a warehouse storage unit where he kept his fishing boat - a 14-foot aluminum Gamefisher that was reportedly purchased just two weeks before Laci vanished...........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, Calif. -- Proceedings in the Scott Peterson preliminary hearing were delayed Wednesday after lead defense attorney Mark Geragos was forced to stay in Los Angeles to deal with a hung jury in another murder case.

Geragos was absent from the proceedings on Tuesday, but was expected to be back in Modesto on Wednesday morning. When the court was told he had been delayed, the proceedings were pushed back to 2:30 p.m. in the hopes that Geragos could make it back. But when Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami was told Geragos could not make it back at all, he called off the proceedings.

On Tuesday, with defense attorney Kurt McAllister taking the lead, Modesto police officer Jon Evers testified about what he saw when he arrived at the Peterson home on Christmas Eve.

He said he noticed a mop bucket and two mops in front of Scott and Laci Peterson's home. The officer said the mops were in plain view as he entered the modest single-story green-shingled house on Covena Avenue.

Evers also said he never smelled bleach or any other cleaning agent inside the house.

The testimony is considered a counterpoint to a possible prosecution argument that Peterson, 31, cleaned and mopped the kitchen after killing his wife on the night of Dec. 23.

Other officers have reported detecting the scent of bleach in the kitchen. The mop bucket was seized for evidence, Evers said.

Evers testified on the fifth day of a hearing to determine if Peterson will stand trial on two counts of murder for the death of his wife and unborn son.

While Evers' report noted that there was no evidence of a break-in or sign of a struggle in the house, he did notice that a rug by the breezeway was "scrunched" up against the door jamb. He asked Peterson about it.

"I pointed out that it was the first time I noticed the rug scrunched up against the door," Evers said. "I asked him, 'Is that always like that?"'

"He said, 'Oh no, the cat and dog must have been playing,"' Evers said.................

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Laci Peterson was reported missing December 24; her husband, Scott, has pleaded innocent to charges of killing her and their unborn son.

A defense expert says a DNA testing technique used to identify a hair found in Scott Peterson's boat is unreliable.

MODESTO, California (CNN) -- A lawyer for Scott Peterson on Tuesday cross-examined one of the first police officials to interview Peterson after his wife was reported missing.

The cross-examination by defense attorney Kirk McAllister came in an abbreviated session of Peterson's preliminary hearing. Lead defense attorney Mark Geragos was in court in Los Angeles on another case.

Detective Jon Evers interviewed Peterson on December 24 last year, the day Peterson's wife was reported missing by her family.

Evers testified he was told by another law enforcement official that although Peterson said he was fishing in the San Francisco Bay that day, he could not specify the kind of fish he hoped to catch.

Peterson is charged with killing his pregnant wife, Laci, 27, and their unborn son. Their bodies washed up from San Francisco Bay in April.

Peterson, a 31-year-old former fertilizer salesman, has proclaimed his innocence. Prosecutors have said they would seek the death penalty if he is convicted.

I just read that performance, Scott's message to Laci, to my husband. He asked me, Did he say "I'll see you in a bit?" or "I'll see you in a boat?"

This is really weird, about the swabs. I finally read the testimony and what Brocchini said was that he sent the swabs for testing, but as far as he knew, the results weren't back. I guess, since he wasn't on the edge of his seat waiting, that must mean that they do not think the gun was the murder weapon.

Heard that the gun was missing its grips, and that it "dry-fired" last time Scott said he tried to use it. Don't know what dry-firing is. Sounds like the gun doesn't work too well.

I just had to laugh when I saw JANIE WEINTRAUB defending Scott's owning of a gun on TV last night! It's so hilarious to see such an obvious liberal saying something like, "so he owned a gun, no big deal!"

Cyn, in the Westerfield case (I'm tiptoing here - lol), didn't they have records that indicated the time and probable place for every phone call he made that weekend?

I'd think they could easily ascertain the reliability of Scott's words in his messages, especially when he was saying what time it was and where he was calling from.

I almost puke when I see or hear those words in his message to Laci. I wonder if Sharon would step aside and let me have have just one swing at him....

Pinz

YES! I'm glad you said that, maggiefluffs! Yes, they said there was a Louis Vuitton wallet in the purse! It's in Brocchini's testimony, Vel.

And then Brocchini and McAllister go on about how neither of them knew what that meant, or who Louis Vuitton was.

And I was thinking, what was a Louis Vuitton wallet doing in her purse? I thought he had given her one for Christmas??

Maybe she then would've had TWO? And if she already had one, and then he gave her one for Christmas, doesn't sound like he gave her a very exciting Christmas gift.

Yes, I was thinking of the Westerfield case tracking cell phone receiving towers or whatever they are, and they explained how if you are at point A it is most likely a certain tower was the transmitter. I do recall them saying most likely, though.

As to the message left for Laci, may I say it is a pleasure to be in perfect agreement with you!

I wonder what the home machine message said. They did not testify to that yet. Could be same or similar...

Sandy, my prayers and best wishes are with you and your husband. I know from similar experience that the waiting is often the hardest part. Please email me privately if you ever want to just unload some stress. Sometimes that helps.

I feel sick reading that. Considering the woman he'd been shagging, not to mention what Snott had just done to Laci and the condition Laci was found in, calling her "Beautiful" is an additional slap in the face to her loved ones.

Thanks Maggie, got it! So if Laci already had a Louis Vuitton wallet, does this mean that Snott didn't even think of buying her a Christmas present? Not even an "alibi" present? Arrrgh.

He also sent e-mails before and after the fishing trip, so the power was working then.

Tried selling his fertilizer to everyone from the git go. Creep.

I usuall put on mute or change channels when Weintraub come on. Her laughing and smirking when talking about Laci gives me the creeps. Reminds me of someone not quite normal.

That was my same thought. I know Scott said he got her one. Did he not expect the question from Diane Sawyer. Maybe he got her the wallet the year before. Another lie??

I wonder if the police or Laci's family know if there really was a new wallet. I think they do. They mention this conversation at http://www.lacipeterson.com/whatshappening/page08.html

I bet they know it is a lie.

Did he say "I'll see you in a bit?" or "I'll see you in a boat?"

Good one.

What bothers me is the part where Scotty saids; I was hoping you would get this message and go on out there.

It is past tense, and not the way you would leave a "real" message. Wouldn't you say, "I hope you get this message before Vella Farms closes. If you do, can you pick up the basket for "papa".

Of course, maybe he wanted to be placed at 2:15 in Berkely "far from home where she 'disappeared'" thinking the bodies would never be found

I agree. He thought that by letting the dog out with the leash, nobody would question him. He never thought those bodies would surface.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.