Terri's Fight - (Daily Thread/Updates) November 8 -10

Various | November 7, 2003 | sweetliberty

[drlevy88]

Further, to describe this as an "execution" is simply unproductive rhetoric designed to inflame the issue.

If she's not dying until the action is taken place to cause her to die, what is it? If Florida had simply locked John Wayne Gacy in a room with nothing to eat or drink, rather than frying in the electric chair, they would have gotten the same result albeit a little less quickly.

[pollywog]

Here's the link: Affidavit of Carla Iyers, RN (in pdf).

Thanks nicmarlo. You mean to tell me that THIS was not admitted into evidence by Judge Greer , or even taken into CONSIDERATION?????

[daylate-dollarshort]

And???...........That is precisely what the Schlindlers and their attorney asked for in their appeal.

[LADY J]

"I'm pretty dense, so I only partly understand what you're saying...LOL. Why would a person running a legitimate business want to file for a fictitious (I think I got it right this time)name?"

Sorry I was not clear. The legitimate business is required to be advertised and made public under the name that will be displayed. Example would be 'Sunshine Restaurant' - the owner being Joe Smith.

Joe Smith is not the same as Sunshine Restaurant - so he would have to advertise to the public that he - Joe Smith is going to use the alias of Sunshine Restaurant to do business. This publication is required ahead of opening the business.

If I'm in error - I'm sure someone will correct my understanding of this Florida law.

[drlevy88]

The scans themselves are in evidence.

Produce them for all Freep doctors to examine then?

[nicmarlo]

I believe the Florida Kangaroo Court said because of the notarial error (the "'did' or 'did not' sworn to" not being crossed out), they said it was hearsay.

[drlevy88]

If the kangaroo hops again, it remains a kangaroo.

[nicmarlo]

Apparently the law changed in 2001; see my post #1254

[daylate-dollarshort]

Cute, now try to answer the question..

[daylate-dollarshort]

But then God did give power to the angel Lucifer......

[nicmarlo]

But there is no legitmate question to answer. Do you not understand "shall"?

[LADY J]

"Apparently the law changed in 2001; see my post #1254"

I posted ahead of reading your update. Thanks for doing the legwork on this.. *S*

[nicmarlo]

but Lucifer is not God; he merely desires to be.

[drlevy88]

To whom you now bow?

[nicmarlo]

yw. : )

[nicmarlo]

yw. : )

[Lurking Libertarian]

You mean to tell me that THIS was not admitted into evidence by Judge Greer , or even taken into CONSIDERATION?????

An affidavit is hearsay. The nurse would have to testify in person (or give a deposition) in order for her testimony to be admissible. The parents could have subpoenaed her.

[sweetliberty]

Oh, I won't be going anywhere for awhile I don't think. It takes a little while to get the thread together, but that will also require me to get a bit more up to speed. It's just that I have to work early in the morning. The nerve of them calling me in to work when I'm supposed to be laid off for a couple of months. LOL!

[daylate-dollarshort]

I didn't say Lucifer was God...only that God gave power to him. What Lucifer did or does with the power granted him is the irony and to Lucifer's everlasting shame and torment.

[drlevy88]

And what you do to try to justify the Greer court is the same.