Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hustler to publish Jessica Lynch pics! (Drudge)
Drudge ^

Posted on 11/10/2003 7:54:28 PM PST by sonsofliberty2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-328 next last
To: PhilDragoo; MeeknMing; Chad Fairbanks; weegee; GeronL; ambrose; DoughtyOne; jellybean; Old Sarge; ..


a better subject to view then Jessica Lynch!

click the pictures to restart action

LAURIE DHUE!

FAIR & BALANCED!






sorry, I could not find a "tri-burst" kiss yet!

most browsers will "scroll refresh" the animation


261 posted on 11/11/2003 12:53:04 AM PST by autoresponder ( http://0access.web1000.com/seeBS.gif - NEW URL! --> http://0access.web1000.com/alreg-xw.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm; All
"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

http://www.militarycorruption.com/PFCLynch.htm

Someone e-mailed me what are supposedly these photos. If they are the ones, no face is visible, the pics are neck-down. Could be anyone.

262 posted on 11/11/2003 1:28:44 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
"She allowed pictures of herself to be taken."

Well, somebody allowed pics to be taken.

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

http://www.militarycorruption.com/PFCLynch.htm

263 posted on 11/11/2003 1:34:01 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
"I think she actually posed for the pictures."

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

http://www.militarycorruption.com/PFCLynch.htm

264 posted on 11/11/2003 1:37:37 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I don't know of any decent female posing for nude pictures like this. It is NOT the norm as some would like you to believe. It takes a certain "type" of female to pose naked or perform sex acts for a camera.

Especially when she posed topless with not one but two guys, and the pictures were taken while she was in the military. Doesn't the military have a code of conduct?

265 posted on 11/11/2003 1:41:48 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"She was apparently showing off for somebody, and now she will be showing off for everybody."

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

http://www.militarycorruption.com/PFCLynch.htm

266 posted on 11/11/2003 1:42:54 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Hey folks, it might not even be her. This could all be a hoax to get the slimeball Flynt some publicity.

It's not a hoax. Flynt is a slimeball, but he's not stupid.

267 posted on 11/11/2003 1:44:10 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
"...she was dumb enough to allow her boyfriend to take the pic's..."

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

268 posted on 11/11/2003 1:50:42 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's the link to the full article on this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1019089/posts
269 posted on 11/11/2003 1:51:03 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: cmotormac44
"I am curious to understand how a person can have naked pics of themselves taken without their knowledge or agreement?--of course there is always the 'hole in the wall' trick but I am sure most of us will agree it is somewhat unusual for this type of story to 'pop-up' out of the blue--"Sometimes a girl can have pics made that were totally not her fault--"---give me a break---try some morality--you just might like it for a change"

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

You can have naked pics your own self just by having your head pasted on a naked body, or by having faceless pics presented as you, as is apparently the case here.

270 posted on 11/11/2003 1:58:29 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: milemark
"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica" You can have naked pics your own self just by having your head pasted on a naked body, or by having faceless pics presented as you, as is apparently the case here.

Please read the article that I linked above. It says that they can and have identified the pix as being Jessica.

271 posted on 11/11/2003 2:00:09 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: milemark
One other thing -- if these photos were not of Jessica, don't you think that her lawyer and publicist would be shouting from the rooftops that they were fake? They haven't denied anything!
272 posted on 11/11/2003 2:01:25 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: sandlady
"Unfortunately, spurned boyfriends (or anyone for that matter) can post someone who's not you but has your head."

Has the head.. in the freezer?

273 posted on 11/11/2003 2:12:59 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Porterville; All
"Sick,

Of course, you all clicked on this post didn't ya!!! Crazy how easy it is to look into the minds of every man."

Point taken, but you clicked it as well.

274 posted on 11/11/2003 2:16:13 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Well when you play with fire you are going to get burned.

What a message for the youth of America.

Sounds like Jessica has only one marble in her head.
275 posted on 11/11/2003 2:16:51 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
When you get nekkid in front of a camera and the photos turn up later you have only yourself to blame. Regardless of wether or not the person taking the pictures was a creep...
276 posted on 11/11/2003 2:18:56 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51
"I am disgusted by the fact that on Free Republic, a forum that normally prides itself of getting the facts straight, people are spilling the most vile filth about this young lady based on nothing more than reading a headline."

Internet forums are just a high tech version of a men's room wall. FR was just the last can with a blank wall available.

277 posted on 11/11/2003 2:23:46 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"So what. It’s not like she was doing anything weird or really immoral. Topless photos… oh the shame…"

The snapshots, apparently taken in a barracks before Lynch's unit , the 507th Maintenance Company, departed for Iraq, are said to show the fresh-faced, all-American girl topless, touching herself with her blue jeans pulled down, and in one pose simulating a sex act well known to Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.

Ya.....an unmarried woman simulating sex acts in front of a camera for male soldiers.....nothing immoral about that. She's a model of virtue and a true "lady".

278 posted on 11/11/2003 2:26:26 AM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"It takes a certain "type" of female to pose naked or perform sex acts for a camera."

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

It takes a certain "type" of person to make judgements based on bunk.

279 posted on 11/11/2003 2:26:58 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: sandlady; nmh
"BTW You read the part from this thread that says they're not even sure it's her, right?"

Well, of course not, that might interfere with jumping to conclusions. It might also make sense. Can't have that.

"the explicit photographs cannot be positively identified as being those of Jessica"

280 posted on 11/11/2003 2:31:01 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson