Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panel Rules Justice Moore Failed to Respect & Comply with Law; Judge removed from Supreme Court

Posted on 11/13/2003 9:23:02 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

More to follow


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10commandments; 1stamendment; aclu; alabama; byebyeloser; constitution; court; courthouse; creator; decalogue; firstamendment; founders; foundingfathers; fundiemania; goodriddence; justice; justicemoore; justiceroymoore; law; lawbreaker; laws; lawyers; moore; naturesgod; roymoore; supremecourt; tencommandments; usconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-707 next last
To: WackyKat
A grammer error on a high paced message board does not signify illiteracy.
101 posted on 11/13/2003 9:51:27 AM PST by alisasny (THANKYOU environmentalists for making the 2003 fire season all it could be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
So we need robots to execute public service. You know many who work in the public sector work 14-20 hours a day, working overtime at home.... This isn't the Matrix
102 posted on 11/13/2003 9:51:42 AM PST by Porterville (Grow some leather or go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He says that all he did was acknowledge God.

He has no comprehension of what he did.

103 posted on 11/13/2003 9:51:43 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I have a plan. I need a dead monkey, empty liquor bottles and a vacuum cleaner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Again with the exaggerations. The only thing that Separationists are trying to do is forbid government entities from showing preference for certain faiths. That is hardly "everything".

No. They've chosen antiChrist.

Your attitude- that anyone who doesn't agree with your narrow, sectarian religious beliefs is "antiChrist" shows exactly why the theocracy you want is a horrible idea.

You would make the "unsaved"(in your view) into second class citizens.

104 posted on 11/13/2003 9:51:46 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I'd rather have Hillary. That's very telling.

Yes, it is. About what a ruthless unprincipled scoundrel and all around classic Southern Con Man Mr. Moore is.

So9

105 posted on 11/13/2003 9:52:06 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
So long Senator Shelby, hello Senator Moore.
106 posted on 11/13/2003 9:52:31 AM PST by TonyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
The court had no choice. He failed to perform his duties within the law.

Bull! It is the Federal courts and that cretin Pryor who failed to perform their duties under the law. These tyrants want to make SECULAR-HUMANISM the established national religion! They have a TWISTED revisionist view of the 1st Amendment - history is clear on what the 1st amendment is about.

Here is what Roy Moore said about them, truth be told:

"Their approach is very deceptive. That's what it is. They yell, "separation of church and state!" but they want to exclude the knowledge of God. And they've led people to believe that the phrase "separation of church and state" actually separates God and government, and God from our life and Christian principles. That is absolutely not true, historically, legally or logically. It's completely the opposite. The very phrase "separation of church and state" mandates an acknowledgement of God. It mandates that you recognize that God separated the jurisdiction of the church from the jurisdiction of the state. ... Throughout the Old and New Testaments you see a separation of those things which belong to Caesar, and those things which belong to God. "

Moore is right on historically. The founders put God as ultimate sovereign over civil govt. and the church. Our rights come from God not the ACLU or the govt!!

ROY MOORE IS PUTTING GOD AND MORAL PRINCIPLE AHEAD OF HIS WELL BEING! I SALUTE HIM! HE IS A HERO. This is only the beginning of the WAR that will be fought over the tyrannical attempts to erase God from this land. I WILL FIGHT to keep my God-given rights.

It's time for all God-fearing Americans to DEFY and disobey bad rulings by bad judges! It's time for civil disobedience on a grand scale. They can't do anything about it and have no means to enforce these rulings should millions of Americans defy them!! Rise up church! The time is now.

107 posted on 11/13/2003 9:52:43 AM PST by exmarine (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
This judge appears to be a "victimist". Many American Christians are victimists, longing like most Americans, to be the victim of some kind of persecution. WE ARE NOT PERSECUTED IN THIS COUNTRY.
108 posted on 11/13/2003 9:53:20 AM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
I agree to a point: we do not need any public official going off the deep end on his own (and yeah, her kinda did). So yes, the state authorities could have stomped on him (they did today, but NOT for States' Rights reasons). If a remember correctly, the Alabama Supreme Court didn't get involved over the monument until the Feds had already done so -- then the issue ceased to become States' Rights, but one of yielding to a Federal Order. Moore believes that order to be unlawful, and I do happen to agree on that isolated point.

Otherwise,... yeah: he did a middle-of-the-night installation of this rock for grandstanding purposes more than for religious purposes, IMHO.

109 posted on 11/13/2003 9:53:42 AM PST by alancarp (With all of that sweeping under the rug, it's a wonder how DEMs can walk on their lumpy carpets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Individuals in public office DO have freedom of speech. They do not, however, have the freedom to use the power of government to support their specific faith. They do not have a "right" to declare that an entire state will recognize and revere their God.
110 posted on 11/13/2003 9:54:04 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
Typo on #109: "(he kinda did)"
111 posted on 11/13/2003 9:55:09 AM PST by alancarp (With all of that sweeping under the rug, it's a wonder how DEMs can walk on their lumpy carpets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
ROY MOORE IS PUTTING GOD AND MORAL PRINCIPLE AHEAD OF HIS WELL BEING! I SALUTE HIM! HE IS A HERO.

Then he had no business being a judge.

112 posted on 11/13/2003 9:55:11 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I have a plan. I need a dead monkey, empty liquor bottles and a vacuum cleaner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
And after losing the appeal, like the good carnie huckster he is, he'll have the opportunity to launch his new televangelism ministry or political campaign, depending on what appears more profitable.

So you will damn him no matter which proverbial lemonade he makes?
113 posted on 11/13/2003 9:55:21 AM PST by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
ROY MOORE IS PUTTING GOD AND MORAL PRINCIPLE AHEAD OF HIS WELL BEING! I SALUTE HIM! HE IS A HERO. This is only the beginning of the WAR that will be fought over the tyrannical attempts to erase God from this land. I WILL FIGHT to keep my God-given rights.

Somehow, I think your reply would be a little different if his God was Allah.

114 posted on 11/13/2003 9:55:31 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
The question is...'Does he get to keep his rock'?

_______________________

Question. Who paid for the rock?

115 posted on 11/13/2003 9:55:51 AM PST by Hessian (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Yes, it is. About what a ruthless unprincipled scoundrel and all around classic Southern Con Man Mr. Moore is.

Moore has history and truth on his side, you have the ACLU, anti-christian secular humanists, moral relativists and revisionists on yours.

116 posted on 11/13/2003 9:56:04 AM PST by exmarine (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Belial
Why? Should a judge be able to act unlawfully as long as he's on "God's side"?

Our nations laws are based on God. Some have spun them to support Satan, but the founding fathers based them on God/ Biblical principles. Why should a man who follows the US laws based on God go against God? That would be a lie - a hypocracy - a blasphamy. Moore did what was right, and in tune with our forefathers intent.
The antiChrist followers put socialist PC first these days. It doesn't mean their lie is right. It just means the followers of antiChrist have been decieved by a lieing tounge.
When a God of Sodomy is placed in a public square, and the ten commandments outlawed, we see the truth of the new antiChrist agenda. In a socialist/communist society, morality is not allowed.

117 posted on 11/13/2003 9:56:16 AM PST by concerned about politics ( So it is. It is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Holy Commandments Legs ;)
118 posted on 11/13/2003 9:56:18 AM PST by JustPiper (18 out of 19 HiJacker's had State issued Driver's License's !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
So individuals in public office do not have a right to freedom of speech?? Think about it, you going to have to put a muzzle on every public individual from believing in anything, from faith in parking tickets to faith in God.

What a ridiculous statement. Moore can believe anything he wants and worship all he wants, in private.

He just can't use the State Supreme Court building as a tool of evangelism

BTW, if Moore was a Hindu, would you agree with his putting statues of Hindu gods in the building?

119 posted on 11/13/2003 9:56:23 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jess35
And where does the distinction lie?? Where a public servant spend their publicly funded pay check???
120 posted on 11/13/2003 9:56:41 AM PST by Porterville (Grow some leather or go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson