Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wilder Effect - Why Bobby Jindal lost in Louisiana, despite being ahead in the polls.
Weekly Standard ^ | 11/17/03 | FredBarnes

Posted on 11/18/2003 8:40:56 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

BOBBY JINDAL'S DEFEAT in the Louisiana governor's race Saturday is a bigger loss for Republicans than just an office they've held for eight years. For now, it denies the party an impressive new national figure, a 32-year-old Indian-American who's destined to be a political star sometime--but not yet.

Why did Jindal lose after leading his Democratic opponent, Kathleen Blanco, in statewide polls in the weeks before the election? In a word, race. What occurred was the "Wilder effect," named after the black Virginia governor elected in 1989. Wilder, a Democrat, polled well, then won narrowly. Many white voters, it turned out, said they intended to vote for a black candidate when they really didn't. Questioned by pollsters, they were leery of being seen as racially prejudiced.

Jindal's advisers worried that he might lose the "Bubba vote," rural whites unwilling to vote for a black candidate or even a dark-skinned Indian-American. The Jindal camp's fears were realized. A Republican normally needs two-thirds of the white vote to win in Louisiana to compensate for losing nearly all of the black vote. But Jindal got only 60 percent of whites, according to an analysis by GCR & Associates Inc., a political consulting firm. Its findings were reported in the New Orleans Times-Picayune.

Had Jindal fared better among blacks, he might have won despite losing white votes. But he got only 9 percent of blacks, this after mounting a highly-publicized effort to attract black voters. Jindal was endorsed by several black political organizations, a former associate of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, who is black. Nonetheless, he did only slightly better among blacks than Republicans normally do.

Jindal, whose parents moved to Baton Rouge from India shortly before he was born, won 70 percent of the white vote in the New Orleans area. But outside that urban hub in the more rural and poorer parts of the state, only 48 percent of whites voted for Jindal, according to the GCR analysis.

Blanco's victory was hailed by Democrats, and for good reason. It broke the Republican winning streak in governor's contests this year. (One of those new Republican governors, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is being sworn in today in California.) Republicans also won in Kentucky and Mississippi, seats that had also been held by Democrats. In Louisiana, Republican Gov. Mike Forster is stepping down after two terms. His successor, Blanco, is a conservative Democrat opposed to abortion and tax increases and closer philosophically to Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia than to most national Democrats.

Jindal, a Brown University graduate and Rhodes Scholar with a dazzling résumé, ran a positive campaign, calling himself a "problem solver." When Blanco ran a TV commercial attacking his tenure as head of Louisiana's hospitals, he didn't respond directly to the charges, though he criticized her for going negative. Some Republican strategists thought his campaign was simply too nice for the rough and tumble of Louisiana politics, especially when he left serious charges unrefuted.

Had he won, Jindal would surely have emerged as a national spokesman for the Republican party. For one thing, he is a policy wonk who talks knowledgeably about health care, Medicare reform, and education. For another, he would add to the ethnic diversity of Republican leaders. But his time has not yet come.



TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2003; bobbyjindal; bubbavote; dougwilder; fredbarnes; jindal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Clemenza
While these may not be her real views, her track record on social issues so far, albiet as Lt Gov, there is not much of anything to get a record on, is as a conservative. The NRA was neutral in this election, and so were right to life organisations. Supposedly Blanco has even attended pro life events. She even has been on record as opposing affirmative action as well.

Again, now that she has real power, she may rapidly change the views she run on, much like many other Democrats have done, but for a white working class conservative, was there really anything to gain, knowing they mostly vote on social issues, by chosing Jindal over Blanco?
41 posted on 11/18/2003 12:57:17 PM PST by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: newgeezer
"Songs that made the Hit Parade!"

That's why we have to fear a Hillary! candidacy.

43 posted on 11/18/2003 1:07:51 PM PST by gridlock (Countdown to Hillary!: ONE day... Hillary! will announce for President TOMORROW, Weds. Nov 19, 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JNB
She will change so fast it will give you whiplash. As funny sidenote as backgound perhaps....my wife and I at one time a number of years back sat next to Sheila Jackson Lee at a national Chrisitian Coalition conference at the Hilton in DC and my wife and her talked at length about their mutual discust over the Clintons. All this was before she ran for office. The post election change was inlightening to say the least.
44 posted on 11/18/2003 1:10:32 PM PST by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax
Sad that this si expected from Democrats, but then again, Sheila Jackson Lee fell in line with the Black Caucus. If anything, Gov elect Blanco no doubt sees that it was the rural white vote that won her the election, unlike both of Landreaus victories, and that may possibly temper a potential lurch to the left.
45 posted on 11/18/2003 1:13:43 PM PST by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Southack
You make some great points with which I agree.

Your comments have also stimulated some new thoughts for me related to our form of government. Thoughts about why perhaps direct voter referendums and ballot measures which in essence work around our legislators, in the long run tend to undermine our Republican form of government....by giving many voters the sense that they can have their cake and eat it too....which explains why many voters (not just Black) vote Democrate but also vote in favor of the most socially conservative ballot measures you could imagine.
46 posted on 11/18/2003 1:25:47 PM PST by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JNB
Good point.
47 posted on 11/18/2003 1:42:26 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax; Southack
All ballot initiative brought us when we lived in Florida is higher educational expenditures and a "super train" that no one will ride once completed. Thankfully, the conservative legislature down there has stalled the latter.

Ballot initiatives=Rule by the Sheeple

48 posted on 11/18/2003 1:44:13 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: deport
The Times Picayune article that was referenced by Barnes...... Adding for archival purposes

Support among white voters helped Blanco turn tide

Jindal polled better than normal among state's black voters

Sunday November 16, 2003

By Laura Maggi and Jeffrey Meitrodt
Staff writers

Kathleen Blanco's remarkable victory Saturday was propelled by her ability to capture more white voters than Democrats typically can count on in statewide races against Republicans.

Republican Bobby Jindal's bold push to win over African-American voters with high-profile endorsements succeeded to a point: He got 9 percent of the black vote, almost twice what most Republicans typically get in the state.

But as much attention as that garnered, a key to Blanco's victory was the white vote, of which she won 40 percent, according to an analysis of returns in Louisiana's 4,143 precincts by GCR & Associates Inc., a political consulting firm in New Orleans.

In the weeks leading up to Saturday's vote, Jindal was considered the front-runner because he led in some polls, even as others showed the race close.

After the primary, during which she captured 18 percent of the vote to Jindal's 33 percent, Blanco had a tough time pulling together the disparate Democratic factions.

Blanco's best hope seemed to be energizing the Democratic base of African-Americans to go to the polls. Historically, African-Americans vote less regularly than white voters, and Democrats were concerned that turnout would decline in the runoff since Blanco ran third among African-American voters in the Oct. 4 primary.

In the primary, only 45 percent of the state's black voters turned out, according to Greg Rigamer of GCR. Saturday, that rate climbed to 46 percent.

White vote was unchanged at 54 percent, Rigamer said.

In an unusual twist for most Democratic statewide candidates, Blanco could not take for granted that she would receive the overwhelming number of those votes. Early in the runoff, Jindal made an effort to woo black voters from their traditional role as stalwart members of the Democratic camp, winning endorsements from a handful of black leaders, including New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin.

In the end, Blanco won 91 percent support among black voters.

Significantly, her support among black voters in the New Orleans area was slightly smaller at 89 percent, perhaps because of the Nagin endorsement.

But Jindal's bigger problem, it turned out, was among white voters. Republicans typically need about two-thirds of the white vote in order to succeed in a statewide race, said Elliot Stonecipher, a political analyst based in Shreveport.

Jindal achieved that in the New Orleans area, winning 70 percent of white voters, Rigamer said. But in the rest of the state, he trailed Blanco among white voters, getting only 48 percent.

The Times-Picayune paid Rigamer for his analysis. A portion of the firm's work is conducted for politicians, and in this race Rigamer worked for Blanco.



49 posted on 11/18/2003 1:44:18 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I guess we have to draw the "OUTSOURCING" line somewhere!!
50 posted on 11/18/2003 1:58:38 PM PST by Lael (Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jordan8
Jindal led the primaries and got 60% of the white vote but it's never enough for the hate-spewing genocidal left and their "conservative" collaborators.


60%...... How do you figure that? Got a source?

Jindal got 33% [443,389] of the total votes cast in the Jungle. There were 1,000,354 white votes cast in the Jungle.... 60% of the 1,000,354 white votes would be 600,012 votes.... or 156,832 votes more than he actually got...... There were 1,394,727 total votes cast in the Jungle.

Source: Louisiana Sec. of State web page.... election results
http://www.sec.state.la.us/elections/elections-index.htm
51 posted on 11/18/2003 2:02:57 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Every election result from Lousyana makes me more and more proud that I fled that state in 1997, the state in which I was born. Texas is my home now. My wife and I have made two native Texans who will be proud of their state and country.

I learned a huge lesson in this election, which is, no matter what, Louisiana will alway be a stinking hell-hole. I actually had hope for my native state on election day. Ordinarilly, I am pestimistic towards Lousisiana. I read the polls, got hopeful, only to be slapped into reality. If not for my friends and family, I would never return there.

52 posted on 11/18/2003 2:04:43 PM PST by lormand (Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg; presidio9
Just my opinion. I won't bore you with the details of my thinking.
53 posted on 11/18/2003 2:08:36 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Huck; cyborg
Humor us. When you make a strong absolute statement about a woman a lot of people here admire, the onus is on you to back it up or take it back. Be a man.
54 posted on 11/18/2003 2:11:51 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lormand
I'm sorry you feel the way you do about Louisiana. It's so pretty!
55 posted on 11/18/2003 2:20:32 PM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
When you make a strong absolute statement about a woman a lot of people here admire, the onus is on you to back it up or take it back. Be a man.

What are you gonna do next? Call me chicken? Look, I am just not motivated to get into a discussion about it. It's really not that important what I think. I am pretty sure it won't make a difference on what you think. So why bother? Why not just let it be? Huck doesn't want Condi Rice to be president. It's not that big a deal.

To tell you the truth, I don't really know of any really inspiring leaders on the GOP side. I can't think of one, come to think of it. Maybe one will emerge. Could you list 3 GOP potential candidates that excite you? I seriously can't think of one.

56 posted on 11/18/2003 2:25:18 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Huck
What are you gonna do next? Call me chicken?

Don't need to. You've demonstrated your character admirably. No worries. Ms Rice does not need my help protecting hers from the likes of you.

57 posted on 11/18/2003 2:29:31 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Ms Rice does not need my help protecting hers

I see. You were feeling chivalrous. Gotcha.

58 posted on 11/18/2003 2:54:08 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
"I'm sorry you feel the way you do about Louisiana. It's so pretty!"

Yeah, pretty f&^%ed up!

Pretty as in beautiful? Yes, it is, unless you go near urban areas.

59 posted on 11/18/2003 3:20:51 PM PST by lormand (Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"Because I wouldn't want her as President. She isn't even close to being presidential material."

You're right, people were on the Powell bandwagon over race as well.. And look how he turned out.

I think it's best that we stay with policies, not race.
60 posted on 11/18/2003 3:22:37 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson