Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enough With The Neocon And Paleocon Carping—I'll Stand With George W. Bush In 2004
Toogood Reports ^ | Thursday, December 11, 2003; 12:01 a.m. EST | Bernard Chapin

Posted on 12/10/2003 8:59:00 PM PST by BobbyK

Enough With The Neocon And Paleocon
Carping—I'll Stand With George W. Bush In 2004

Like most Toogood Reports readers, I observed this year's battles within the conservative ranks with profound discomfort. In my mind, there are far too many real enemies out there to waste time and print fighting one another.

It seems that the world of conservatism has been split up between the "conservatives" and the "paleo-conservatives" or between the "conservatives" and the "neo-conservatives." Both sides present themselves as the bona fide article and the other side as the one in need of a prefix.

Personally, I just want to spit up this strife the same way the bleachers of Wrigley Field do the opposition´s home run balls. This qualifies as a "which side are you on boys" issue. It is my goal to conserve America's wonderful, non-living Constitution, and to forever preserve the personal and economic freedoms that embody our way of life. If you agree with me about these basic propositions, then you're on my side and the rest of your views are of secondary concern. Simply revering the spirit of the Founding Fathers puts you in the top 50 percent of the population on the Chap-o-meter.

Not only is an inter-journalist, inter-intellectual, conservative civil war fruitless, it is also detrimental to the nation as a whole. The country needs all of our efforts just to have a chance of mitigating the damage the culture war has wrought.

Our daily resistance may be the biggest obstacle to the federal pacman swallowing up fifty percent of the economy. We cannot afford to bicker amongst ourselves. The odds are too great. Obsessing over who said what about Taki, Buchanan, Frum, Lowry or any of the other public figures who make up the American right is counter-productive.

The neocon/paleocon debate is as bewildering as it is petty and misguided. Sadly, some conservatives now feel more comfortable with leftists than they do their own kind [I know of one who astonished me by saying that he regards the American Enterprise Institute as "The Death Star"]. Certainly, internal disagreements are to be expected, but they are trivial in comparison to accepting the positions advocated by the other side of the political spectrum. Socialism, cultural Marxism, white guilt, and radical feminism are eternal obstacles to advancing society. Other conflicts pale in importance when compared to them.

I propose that we abandon slurs like paleo-con and neo-con. Instead we should all evolve into "Logicons." The Logicon refuses to slash at the brethren who march alongside him because maintaining some level of public harmony is the only logical way in which we will succeed. Logicons realize that our fighting strength should not be diluted by internecine combat.

Much of the controversy currently centers around President Bush and whether or not one approves of his job performance. I've written here and elsewhere how much I personally admire him, but I also acknowledge that certain criticisms have been valid. Those who label him a big spender are correct in their assessments. He has not used his veto to curb the size of government and has developed a habit of hugging Ted Kennedy's voluminous appropriations.

While this is unfortunate, to pretend that Bush is not the best bet for advancing the country's interests is shortsighted. There are many conservatives out there who could do a better job of slashing outlays, but it is highly unlikely that any of them could get elected by our emotive and squishy electorate. On our side, George W. Bush "feels their pain" better than anyone. He brings in moderate voters the way my old Erie Dearie lures used to bag walleyes .

The problem is one of perspective. We can spend time complaining about steel tariffs or the administration´s pathetic capitulation on affirmative action last summer. Yes, I would have been greatly pleased if he disseminated a Michigan Law brief of his own after the decision entitled “O´Connor a Known Fruitcake,” but the fact is that he didn't and there´s nothing we can do about it. However, we must keep our outlook global by remembering what the alternatives are.

What would Al Gore do with affirmative action? How about Howard Dean, the neurotic would-be-king, with Al Qaeda? Makes you shudder doesn´t it? After the election, Al Sharpton would take his standup around the world as our Secretary of State and we´d hear Patricia Ireland lambasting “patriarchal textbooks” in her role as Secretary of Education.

In actuality, my examples really aren´t all that farfetched. The radical left has been carrying the Democrat Party since 2001 and, now, if the Democrats win, bills will need to be paid.

Rather than fantasize about an ideal future, conservatives need to think about how things can, and will, get devastatingly worse, should Bush lose. Be it Dean or Kerry or whatever burrito they decide to roll out of the Taqueria next summer, the fate of the country will be in jeopardy. By this time in 2006, there will be a foreign policy coward in every pot and a benefit check in the hands of every college drop out. Think France, think Germany, and then be grateful we have a president who doesn't spit after saying "tax cuts."

Besides, the Bush Presidency has produced many hidden benefits. His appointees may well be our salvation even though he backs obese budgets. In the latest issue of The New Criterion, we see that his appointments to the National Endowment of the Arts have had a wonderful effect. Under Dana Gioia, the agency is sponsoring Macbeth for military bases and has resurrected traditional Shakespeare at the national level [Shakespearean plays are now staged as in the days of old which means brothels and bath house scenes are no longer mandatory].

I don´t care if you insult him or trade in Karl Rove conspiracy theories, but, in November of 2004, this particular rightist is going to stand by George W. Bush just as the bumper sticker on my car promises. Our hopes for a better tomorrow rest in the White House on his bed. We must support him because heady days await and also because his reelection keeps the Democrat Party headless. Let´s proudly stand by our man as he loudly subsumes the popular positions of the left while promoting many of ours in the shadows though his judges, appointees, and minions.

By
Bernard Chapin


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigbudgetbush; biggovernmentbush; bushbots; bushdemocart; bushisclinton; bushsocialisim; carping; changeminds; democrats4bush; election2004; gwb2004; neoconbush; paleoconbush; rino; rinobush; rinorinorino; sandradayoconor4bush; saudisforbush; socialists4bush; standonleftwithbush; votefordean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-324 next last
To: FairOpinion
In other words, you'd like to see a Democrat in the White House -- I guess you learned nothing during 8 years of Clinton.

Sorry, but that's intellectually lazy and simply childish.

I could just as easily say that if you aren't willing to spend $75,000 on a Humvee, you want your children to die in an accident. Come on, you know better than that.

81 posted on 12/10/2003 10:49:17 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Fledermaus
In other words, you'd(Fledermaus) like to see a Democrat in the White House -- I guess you learned nothing during 8 years of Clinton.

Exactly, except Fledermaus and the other so called malcontents use Clintonian tactics to mask it.

82 posted on 12/10/2003 10:50:03 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
The Prez leans left for 2 reasons:
1. He's more to the left than purists, so he's actually not doing so, and...
2. To get more votes by acknowledging the general will of the people.

Only a centrist can win this election. Or at least a seeming Centrist. All others are wasted votes, as the general will rejects the extreme right or left.
83 posted on 12/10/2003 10:50:24 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
How about making even the " pro-choicers " having to call a baby in utero a BABY ?

How about the anti partial birth abortion stuff ?

There's a HUGE list, in FR's archieves, with his accomplishments, many of which, I'm certain you would agree with. :-)

84 posted on 12/10/2003 10:50:24 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
To quote from someone you likely dislike, ''There are no contradictions. If you think there are, check your premises.''

I agree with you in that I think it extremely unlikely, short of some amazing outrage, that the American people will revolt against the government. However, I do trust that you will consider my opinion, whether you agree with it or not, is sincere, and that I am not an hypocrite.

If revolt is not a likelihood, and, again, I do not think it is, then the options are very clear: stay, and let this gov't grind you down one way or another, or leave.

I would hate to leave this lovely land, but I shall, if I can no longer see any hope for the practice of the principles of the Constitution.

And, given current developments, in fairly short order, too.

85 posted on 12/10/2003 10:51:44 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Dane
They are ONLY well pleased, when they and everyone else here is miserable. The all of NOTHING crowd, is never so happy, as when they get NOTHING; unfortunately.
86 posted on 12/10/2003 10:52:00 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Presidency of George W. Bush --the first 36 months



Banned Partial Birth Abortion


Killed the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty.

Killed U.S. involvement in the International Criminal Court.

Killed the U.S. - CCCP ABM Treaty that was preventing the U.S. from deploying our ABM defenses.

Reversed Clinton's move to strike Reagan's anti-abortion Mexico Policy.

Killed Clinton's CO2 rules that were choking off all of the electricity surplus to California.

Killed Clinton's "ergonomic" rules that OSHA was about to implement; rules that would have shut down every home business in America.

Passed 2 tax cuts----1 of which was the largest Dollar value tax cut in history

Pushed through TWO raises for our military.

Increased Defense Dept funding which had deteriorated during the previous 8 years

Signed TWO bills into law that arm our pilots with handguns in the cockpit

Currently pushing for full immunity from lawsuits for our national gun manufacturers.

Ordered Attorney-General Ashcroft to formally notify the Supreme Court that the OFFICIAL U.S. government position on the 2nd Amendment is that it supports INDIVIDUAL rights to own firearms, NOT a leftist-imagined *collective* right.
Told the United Nations we weren't interested in their plans for gun control.

Successfully executed 2 wars: Afghanistan and Iraq. 50 million people who had lived under tyrannical regimes now live in freedom.

Changed the tone in the White House, restoring HONOR and DIGNITY to the Presidency

Reorganized bureaucracy...after 9/11, condensed 20+ overlapping agencies and their intelligence sectors into one agency: the Department of Homeland Security.

Initiated discussion on Social security and individual investment accounts.

Improving govt. efficiency with .8 million jobs put up for bid...weakening unions and cutting undeserved pay raises. Wants merit based promotions/raises only.

Executed a WAR ON TERROR by getting world-wide cooperation to track funds/terrorists (has cut off much of the terrorist's funding and captured or killed many key leaders of the al Qaeda network)

Stopped foreign aid that would be used to fund abortions.

Supported and upheld the ban on abortions at military hospitals

Signed E.O. reversing Clinton policy of not requiring parental consent under the Medical Privacy Act


Orchestrated Republican control of the White House, the House AND the Senate.

Killed the liberal ABA's role in vetting federal judges for Congress.

GWB signed an executive order enforcing the Supreme Court's Beck decision (re: union dues being used for political campaigns against individual's wishes)

Brought back our EP-3 intel plane and crew from China without any bribes or bloodshed

Started withdrawing our troops from Bosnia and has announced withdrawal of our troops from Germany and the Korean DMZ.

Signed the LARGEST nuclear arms reduction in world history with Russia

Initiated comprehensive review of our military, which was completed just prior to 9/11/01, accurately reported that ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE was critical.

Has CONSTRUCTION in process on the first ten ABM silos in Alaska, so that America will have a defense against North Korean nukes

Turning around an inherited economy in recession.

Passed tough new laws to hold corporate criminals to account as a result of corporate scandals.

Reduced taxes on dividends and capital gains

In process of eliminating IRS marriage penalty.

Increased small business incentives to expand and to hire new people

Signed into law the No Child Left Behind legislation delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations)

Reorganized the INS in an attempt to safeguard the borders and ports of America and to eliminate bureaucratic redundancies and lack of accountability.

Signed trade promotion authority

Committed US funds to purchase medicine for millions of men and women and children now suffering with AIDS in Africa

Urging Medicare Reform

Urging federal liability reform to eliminate frivolous lawsuits

Supports class action reform bill which limits lawyer fees so that more settlement money goes to victims

Submitted comprehensive energy plan--awaits Congressional action (works to develop cleaner technology, produce more natural gas here at home, make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy, improve national grid, etc.)

Endorses and promotes The Responsibility Era ("In a compassionate society, people respect one another and take responsibility for the decisions they make in life. My hope is to change the culture from one that has said, if it feels good, do it; if you've got a problem, blame somebody else -- to one in which every single American understands that he or she are responsible for the decisions that you make; you're responsible for loving your children with all your heart and all your soul; you're responsible for being involved with the quality of the education of your children; you're responsible for making sure the community in which you live is safe; you're responsible for loving your neighbor, just like you would like to be loved yourself. " -----this quote was too good to leave out)

Started the USA Freedom Corps

Pushing for privatization of Medicare and CHOICES based on current Federal Employee Health benefits program.

Initiated review of all federal agencies with a goal to eliminate federal jobs (completed September 2003) in an effort to reduce the size of federal gov while increasing private sector jobs.

Part of coalition (Russia, Israel, Palestine, USA) for Israeli/Palestinian "Roadmap to Peace"

Challenged the United Nations to live up to their responsibilities and not become The League of Nations ( in other words, completely irrelevant)

Nominated strong, conservative judges to the judiciary.

Changed parts of the Forestry Management Act to allow necessary clean-up of the national forests in order to reduce fire danger.

As part of the national forests clean-up, the President restricted judicial challenges (based on the Endangered Species Act and other challenges) and removed the need for an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) before removing fuels/logging to reduce fire danger.

Significantly eased field-testing controls of genetically engineered crops.


87 posted on 12/10/2003 10:52:24 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Why do you think the left despises him so?!

Some from the left have conveyed to me they hate him because he's stupid!...(chuckle) I hope I never find a fox as stupid as Dubya' on my property!

88 posted on 12/10/2003 10:53:03 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Correct. A few years of living in certain other nations would likely enhance their respect for the Constitution VERY sharply. Alas, 'tis not to be, eh?
89 posted on 12/10/2003 10:53:53 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
I would hate to leave this lovely land, but I shall, if I can no longer see any hope for the practice of the principles of the Constitution

Then go already and stop your whining masked as flowery rhtoric.

90 posted on 12/10/2003 10:55:48 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Exactly, except Fledermaus and the other so called malcontents use Clintonian tactics to mask it.

What a joke. I bet I was fighting Democrats before you were born. I hate most all of them. But I'd take a Truman over Bush 41.

I've been on the front lines of the conservative wars since the early 1970's and I'm not going to have soft-bellied, give away the store types tell me I'm too much a purist!

I stood behind Reagan, Newt and others for decades only to be sold out constantly when the rubber hit the road (much less so by Reagan who still raised taxes on Soc Sec, gasoline, watered down reforms). Compromise is one thing. Co-opting the other's beliefs to gain politcal advantage is not leadership and does nothing but continue to meld the "two major parties" into one giant monolith of bureaucrats, regulators, cronies and hucksters who are all never held accountable for their mistakes, their mindless idiocy or their flat out criminality.

Sorry, I'm a conservative and I want true conservative governance of small federal powers based completely on the Constitution that IS NOT a f'ing "living, breathing document" to be re-interpreted every decade based not on it's law, but the precedent of the courts.

Don't dare lecture me when you are the ones willing to throw principle out the window to "win" but can never tell us exactly what you won.

91 posted on 12/10/2003 10:58:06 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Well said and "ditto's" to your excellent post for it is a great reminder to all as to what Dubya' has done.

My reply is more of the same however depth of it is lacking...(I haven't got the wind!) LoL's : )

92 posted on 12/10/2003 10:58:31 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Good... LEAVE ! What you'll then find out, is that no other place will satify you either; NONE.

From the very beginnings of this nation, the government has refrained from doing what you and others imagine they should have done and done what you rail against governments and presidents doing. We, all of us, can only vote for those who will do the least TO us and ours and do a bit of what we want done. That's REALITY , not childish wistfullness; which is what you engage in.

And revolt is completely and utterly just a daydream of those who refuse to comprehend exactly what would happen here, yes, even here, should that be attempted. If no one led a revolt during the 8 years of the Clinton horde, it just is NOT going to happen...unless something REALLY horrendous happens, such as being overtaken by the now faltering, faded, almost gone Taliban/OBL's goons.

93 posted on 12/10/2003 10:59:00 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Quite impressive! Can I have a copy of that?
94 posted on 12/10/2003 10:59:21 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Hey, we're still friends and what are friends for? LOL

But seriously, that was one worthy post! :-)

95 posted on 12/10/2003 11:00:11 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
SAJ and I were fighting Clinton hard those eight years WELL BEFORE FRepublic even existed in other forums.
96 posted on 12/10/2003 11:00:55 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Well then, you should know, that I have been fighting, as well, the evil Dems, where I was, and FREEPING all alone, when Jim was still in kindergarten and FR wasn't even a gleam in his eye. LOL
97 posted on 12/10/2003 11:02:33 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

"When all is said and done, when it comes to domestic issues, it looks to me like the legacy of the Republican control of Congress and the presidency for the first time in 50 years is going to be the largest entitlement in modern times, the greatest increase in domestic spending in modern times and one of the greatest set-backs for liberty in modern times. That's the legacy of Republican control of government. This may be "compassionate" conservatism, but it's not "conservatism" at all."
98 posted on 12/10/2003 11:03:02 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (This is the 1st US election in which a global party (socialists) are trying to win a US election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Ah, the hidden totalitarian mindset. If you don't agree, leave, if we'll let you. Or die.

Just, dane, as I would encourage you to make the best decision(s) for your own life in your own good time, I trust that you would allow me the same. And so I shall, in my own good time.

You would presume to dictate the time frame of MY decisions because you disagree with my view on certain matters?

Wow. What size brown shirt do you wear?

99 posted on 12/10/2003 11:04:05 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
"I would hate to leave this lovely land, but I shall, "

==

And you should leave indeed, if you don't appreciate what we have here. Go live somewhere else, and you would kiss the ground and beg on your knees to be let back in.
100 posted on 12/10/2003 11:05:22 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson