Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

District Won't Release Videos Of School Raid
The Post and Courier ^ | Dec. 13, 2003

Posted on 12/13/2003 6:30:12 PM PST by Wolfie

District Won't Release Videos Of School Raid

Berkeley County school officials are refusing to release surveillance camera recordings from the Stratford High School drug sweep, footage that Solicitor Ralph Hoisington said Friday shows police pointing guns directly at students and handcuffing them in a stairwell for no apparent reason. The district's refusal to release the information to the public is a reversal of its position immediately after the raid.

At that time, it allowed WCSC-Channel 5 to record images from several of the roughly 70 cameras throughout the school. The district also allowed The Post and Courier to view some surveillance recordings.

The images recorded by Channel 5, which showed officers bursting into a hallway with guns drawn, triggered national attention after they were broadcast and published.

Now, Berkeley County school officials are refusing to release images from certain cameras that were never shown to reporters but were provided to State Law Enforcement Division investigators reviewing the raid.

The images may shed light on questions still lingering six weeks after the controversial search.

For example, in its official report of the raid, Goose Creek police said officers restrained 10 to 12 students "solely due to the fact that they failed to comply with officer instructions."

But footage from "camera 11," located in a stairwell, shows a group of students holding their hands behind their heads and lying on the ground, said Hoisington, who has seen the surveillance video. "They were being compliant."

The footage then shows an officer "picking up about six of them, strapping them and then putting them back down in the same position they were," Hoisington said.

Release of the surveillance footage also could help settle whether Goose Creek police actually pointed guns at students.

Images initially released to the public from a surveillance camera in the main hall appear to show officers pointing guns at students when they first entered the hall. Some have questioned whether the camera's angle gave a distorted view of how officers actually carried their guns.

But Hoisington said footage from another camera in an area near vending machines shows otherwise.

"When the officers come in on this, they are literally pointing straight at students, sweeping the gun across them, two different officers."

In its report, Goose Creek police said, "several officers unholstered their weapons and positioned them at the low ready position. This was done as more of a defensive precaution ..., primarily due to the unfortunate fact that drugs and money often mean that there is a real propensity for weapon involvement."

Hoisington said the school district supplied the footage from these cameras and others to SLED. He recently sent SLED's findings to the S.C. Attorney General and U.S. Justice Department. He declined to prosecute the case, citing a conflict of interest.

Earlier this week, The Post and Courier asked the Berkeley County School District for access to all footage delivered to SLED, including images from the camera aimed at the stairwell.

In a letter Friday, the district declined to release the materials.

Doing so would violate the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, which generally prohibits the district from releasing personally identifiable information about students, and the state Freedom of Information Act, the district's letter said.

The district cited language in the state act that says certain information can be withheld if information is "of a personal nature" and that disclosure would "constitute unreasonable invasion of personal privacy."

It also cited a state statute defining education records to include videotape with personally identifiable characteristics of students.

Hoisington questioned why district officials are declining to release the images now when they released other tapes immediately after the incident. "It's already out there," he said of images of the search.

Police and school officials decided to sweep through the school after seeing suspicious activity on the school's video cameras over several mornings. More than 107 students were detained during the search. Using a drug-sniffing dog, officers and school officials searched students' belongings. No drugs were found.

A couple of weeks after the raid, a group of more than 100 teachers and students rallied outside Stratford High in support of principal George McCrackin.

A group of students and parents, meanwhile, are suing school and district officials, saying their constitutional rights were violated.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; drugwar; educationnews; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

1 posted on 12/13/2003 6:30:12 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
and that disclosure would "constitute unreasonable invasion of personal privacy."

The irony of it all.

2 posted on 12/13/2003 6:34:43 PM PST by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn; *Wod_list
It is rather convenient, eh? Makes me wonder what they saw on the other tapes that they're trying to hide.
3 posted on 12/13/2003 6:36:46 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
This raid was in response to someone seeing boys loitering outside the boys' room.
4 posted on 12/13/2003 6:39:12 PM PST by gitmo (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
...waiting for the resident group of statists to arrive...think I'll make some popcorn.
5 posted on 12/13/2003 6:42:22 PM PST by Orangedog (Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Family of the youths involved need to talk to a lawyer & then use the system to ream certain govt. officials a new rectal oriface.
6 posted on 12/13/2003 6:45:38 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 "reach out and thump someone " & .50 cal Browning "reach out & CRUSH someone")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nebr FAL owner
Already under way.

Stratford Students File Suit

7 posted on 12/13/2003 6:49:30 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Indeed. Perhaps they can explain why handcuffing, holding at gunpoint, and subjecting the students to the drug dog search is NOT a violation of their privacy, but releasing the videos of it actually happening IS.
8 posted on 12/13/2003 6:51:11 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
should we be surprised that obstruction occurs across the whole spectrum?
9 posted on 12/13/2003 6:52:38 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; EdReform; ladylib; *Donut watch; *Education News; Patriot61
couldn't they just bring in a drug-sniffing dog? or is the SWAT team's budget being threatened and had to do something to justify their existance.
10 posted on 12/13/2003 7:00:46 PM PST by Coleus (God is Pro-Life & Straight & gave us an innate predisposition for protection and self preservation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
funny how things change. a few years ago, under clinton, it was taboo among conservatives to talk about abuse of power by police. now it seems like pretty standard fair.

i'm guessing that the subject has been reframed by the media and their mouthpieces on the 'net to look like a 'right wing problem.'

in other words, since the passing of Homeland Security, it seems that people are willing to acknowledge that institutionalized abuse of power is a real and growing problem; I can only surmise that it's being acknowledged because it can easily be linked to Homeland Security, though it existed in tact well before the present administration.

it's being seized and spun, i surmise, because it can be used to divide 'conservatives.' it's weird. intelligent people will say 'it's all Bush's fault' as if it began with him, which is like saying the moon is made of cheese.

11 posted on 12/13/2003 7:01:15 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Oh, a coverup is always good PR with parents who are fit to be tied anyway.

This bird-brained principal should be tarred and feathered.
12 posted on 12/13/2003 7:03:32 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Paging robertpaulsen.

Please come defend the indefensible.
13 posted on 12/13/2003 7:05:02 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The jury will see the tapes.
14 posted on 12/13/2003 7:09:36 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
They will be destroyed long before that. Neither the school, nor the police thugs can have these tapes get out. They may already be gone.
15 posted on 12/13/2003 7:14:41 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
They may already be gone.

Unless the attorneys for the students are totally incompetent, they should already have a court order protecting all of the footage made on that day.

16 posted on 12/13/2003 7:19:37 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
I am a youth services officer at a juvenile detention facility... the raid was fully justified....stop lamenting the loss of "rights" by juveniles...if we, as adults don't maintain control...they will rake it from us....ZERO tolerance for drugs in the schools...crack down and crack down hard and my detention facility will be virtually out of business
17 posted on 12/13/2003 7:19:51 PM PST by terycarl (G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
And schools that permit this will be out of business too.
18 posted on 12/13/2003 7:23:30 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: templar
Unless the attorneys for the students are totally incompetent, they should already have a court order protecting all of the footage made on that day.

Agreed. However, unless the bureaucrats and the thug cops are as stupid as they are brutish, the will have destroyed the tapes before they were served.

19 posted on 12/13/2003 7:27:26 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
I am a youth services officer at a juvenile detention facility... the raid was fully justified....stop lamenting the loss of "rights" by juveniles...if we, as adults don't maintain control...they will rake it from us....ZERO tolerance for drugs in the schools...crack down and crack down hard and my detention facility will be virtually out of business

I have a sneaking suspicion you just plain hate kids.

20 posted on 12/13/2003 7:27:48 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson