Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Distaso attacks defense motion
The Modesto Bee ^ | Jan 8 2004 | John Cote'

Posted on 01/09/2004 5:36:03 AM PST by runningbear

Distaso attacks defense motion

Distaso attacks defense motion

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Last Updated: January 8, 2004, 08:14:12 AM PST

Prosecutors Wednesday countered a defense effort to dismiss double-murder charges against Scott Peterson. They argued that there was only one reasonable explanation for the bodies of his wife and unborn son washing ashore along San Francisco Bay:

"The evidence leads only to the conclusion that Laci was killed at the hands of another (the defendant)," Deputy District Attorney Rick Distaso wrote in documents filed in Stanislaus County Superior Court.

The defense contends prosecutors failed to show at a November 2003 preliminary hearing that Laci Peterson's death involved a crime or provide evidence Scott Peterson killed her.

Peterson was ordered held for trial on charges he murdered his wife and their unborn son, Conner, following the 12-day hearing. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

Prosecutors need only establish probable cause -- a low threshold of proof -- at the preliminary hearing.

Legal observers have said the defense motion has little chance of success. A hearing on it is set for Wednesday.

The defense maintains prosecutors failed to establish that Laci Peterson's death was a homicide. Her nearly skeletal remains were found in April 2003. A medical examiner listed the manner of death as a homicide but was unable to determine the cause of death.

Prosecutors contend there are three possible explanations for how Laci and Conner Peterson's bodies found their way to San Francisco Bay: foul play, an accident or suicide........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge: Try Peterson in bigger city

Judge: Try Peterson in bigger city


Mark Geragos and Pat Harris, attorneys for Scott Peterson, arrive at the Stanislaus County Court house on Thursday. By MARTY BICEK/THE BEE


Lee and Jackie Peterson, the parents of Scott Peterson, speak to the press as they arrive at the Stanislaus County Courthouse on Thursday. By MARTY BICEK/THE BEE

By JOHN COTÉ and GARTH STAPLEY
BEE STAFF WRITERS

Last Updated: January 8, 2004, 03:57:27 PM PST

Santa Clara, San Mateo and Alameda counties are on the short list of where Scott Peterson's trial on double-murder charges will be held. Superior Court Judge Al Girolami ruled this afternoon that the trial should be moved out of Stanislaus County because of massive pre-trial publicity.

Girolami directed the prosecution and defense to suggest three options each. He told them to consider the following criteria for those locations:

They must be larger metropolitan areas.

They must be communities within driving distance to Modesto.

They must be near a major airport.

Girolami and the attorneys came up with the three Bay Area options. The judge will send the list to the state Administrative Office of the Courts, which will then issue its own list, based on which counties have the available space and personnel for the case.

Girolami said he regretted the inconvenience and hardship the move will cause for witnesses in the case, and the significant cost for the county.

Peterson, 31, is accused of murdering his wife, Laci and their unborn son. Their bodies washed ashore along the San Francisco Bay in April, near where Peterson told police he went fishing on Christmas Eve 2002, the day he reported his .......

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trial site on docket; if it moves, costs climb

Trial site on docket; if it moves, costs climb

By GARTH STAPLEY
BEE STAFF WRITER

Last Updated: January 8, 2004, 08:44:23 AM PST

The cost to move a high-profile trial -- which can be exorbitant -- isn't supposed to enter a judge's mind when he or she makes the big decision.

But there is no way around this fact: It's expensive.

And inconvenient.

"The expense just builds and builds," said Thomas Testa, a San Joaquin County prosecutor who handled two multiple-murder trials moved to Santa Clara County.

In many cases, the extra costs amount to several hundreds of thousands of dollars.

And the Peterson proceeding isn't a run-of-the-mill case. The preliminary hearing alone stretched across three weeks, and the trial is expected to last six months.

Judge Al Girolami today is set to hear arguments from both sides over Peterson's request to move the much-anticipated trial. It is scheduled to begin Jan. 26 but could be postponed, particularly if Girolami says a fair trial in Modesto is unlikely.

Peterson, 31, is charged in the slayings of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. Prosecutors seek the death penalty.

Costs of moving proceedings can stack up quickly -- for everyone involved.

"Little things you don't think about: paper clips, fax machines, a courier service, socks," Testa said. "You've got to orchestrate things that now are on automatic pilot. One night I was driving around in the rain at 11:30, getting lost, looking for a

Magic Marker for an exhibit for the next day."

Aside from attorneys, trials require judges, clerks, bailiffs and stenographers, as well as witnesses, including experts who might need to fly in from anywhere in the United States..........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bay Area may get Peterson trial

Posted on Fri, Jan. 09, 2004

Bay Area may get Peterson trial

By Julia Prodis Sulek
Mercury News

MODESTO - The fate of Scott Peterson may end up in the hands of 12 people from Santa Clara County.

Stanislaus County Judge Al Girolami ruled Thursday that the trial should be moved from Modesto, preferably to Santa Clara County, because overwhelming publicity and the community's connection to the case would make it difficult to find a fair and impartial local jury. Peterson is accused of murdering his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son.

Santa Clara County is Girolami's top choice, with San Mateo and Alameda counties next on his list. Girolami grew up in downtown San Jose and attended Santa Clara University School of Law.

In court Thursday, Girolami said he prefers that the trial be held within driving distance of Modesto and near a major airport. A panel of judges across the state will take the judge's recommendation and survey counties to determine whether they have the time and space to host a trial that could last as long as six months and attract scores of national journalists.

Santa Clara County appears poised to take it on.

``If the venue is changed to Santa Clara County, we are more than willing to accept it and do what we need to do,'' Kim V. Kelly, assistant chief executive officer for Santa Clara County Superior Court, said Thursday afternoon.

Santa Clara County has a history of inheriting high-profile cases -- from Cary Stayner's Yosemite murder trial in 2002 to the case of Richard Allen Davis, who kidnapped and murdered Polly Klaas, and even back to the 1970 trial of black activist Angela Davis, who was acquitted of murder, kidnapping and conspiracy.

In court Thursday, Girolami said he regretted the ........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State court revisits murder of a fetus
What if attacker is unaware of pregnancy?

State court revisits murder of a fetus
What if attacker is unaware of pregnancy?

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer Thursday, January 8, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The state Supreme Court returned to the stormy issue of fetal murder for the first time in a decade Wednesday with arguments over whether a Northern California man who killed his ex-girlfriend could be convicted of a double murder if he didn't know she was pregnant.

In a ruling that is due within 90 days, the court must define a law it was instrumental in passing. The court ruled in 1970 that a man who stomped on his pregnant ex-wife, deliberately killing her fetus, was not guilty of murder because the state's murder law applied only to the killing of a human being.

The California Legislature immediately expanded the state's murder law to cover the killing of a fetus without the woman's consent. Wednesday's hearing, in a case from Mendocino County, concerned the scope of the law: whether a defendant unaware of the intended victim's pregnancy can be convicted of fetal murder.

A ruling in the state's favor could lead to more prosecutions under the law, possibly including some death penalty cases.

Nationally, the issue of crimes against a fetus has become a battleground in Congress, where opposing sides in the abortion debate are battling over legislation that would make it a crime to injure or kill a fetus during a violent federal crime on a pregnant.........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Laci Peterson's mother endorses Kentucky's 'fetal homicide' bill

Laci Peterson's mother endorses Kentucky's 'fetal homicide' bill

By BRUCE SCHREINER
Associated Press

FRANKFORT, Ky. -- The mother of Laci Peterson urged Kentucky lawmakers Thursday to act in the "interests of true justice" and pass a "fetal homicide" bill that has been stymied for years.

Sharon Rocha, whose daughter and unborn grandson were found dead along the California coast last year, wrote a letter endorsing a bill that would apply homicide statutes to a fetus from the time of conception.

The bill also picked up support from Gov. Ernie Fletcher, who told a Capitol rally, "It is time that we pass this legislation."

Under rulings by the Kentucky Supreme Court, a fetus is not a person until a live birth occurs. In one defining case, the court overturned a murder indictment against a man who attacked his pregnant wife and killed the fetus.

In her letter, Rocha said if her daughter and unborn grandson had died in Kentucky, it would have resulted in a single homicide charge.

She said if a mother survives an assault but loses her fetus, Kentucky law doesn't recognize any loss of human life. She said "this injustice would be cured" by enactment of the bill, named the Caleb-Haley Act to memorialize two babies .......

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson Trial To Move Out Of Modesto


Scott Peterson

Peterson Trial To Move Out Of Modesto
Judge Cites Pre-Trial Publicity In Ruling

POSTED: 9:50 AM PST January 8, 2004
UPDATED: 2:56 PM PST January 8, 2004

A Superior Court judge has granted a change of venue in the Scott Peterson murder trial.

NBC11 reporter Karen Brown said the judge pointed to the inordinate amount of publicity given to the case in Modesto and that so many residents sympathized with victim Laci Peterson in her own hometown.

He also pointed the small size of Stanislaus County, with a population of 500,000 -- thus reducing the pool of potential jurors, as a reason for his decision.

The judge's decision denied arguments by county prosecutors that news coverage of the case, which gained national notoriety as Laci Peterson's disappearance went unsolved for nearly five months last year, is so widespread in California that there is no point in moving the trial.

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos argued in court papers that Peterson has been demonized and that the prosecution's argument "can be boiled down to the old adage, 'Sure we can give him a fair trial, then we will take him out and hang him."'........

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Velveeta
<< An orange bear? What about the Albino bears, black bears, brown bears? How do you think they're going to feel when they see that YOU favor an ORANGE BEAR? You are inciting racial divide among bears and I can't bear it. >>

Oh,oh, Vel. Now you've done it. You didn't mention the Panda bears. How do you think that makes our friends in China feel? :)
41 posted on 01/09/2004 2:29:55 PM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
I heard this False Survey thing on Court TV this morning while getting ready for work. IMO I wouldn't be surprised if some Defense types were behind it. I DO believe that the Judge should address it tho and frankly overturn his decision. As to Geragos's comment, I hope he keeps doing things like that, his dispicable nature will NOT be lost on future Jurors who hear him. He is pure POISON if you ask me. He should turn OFF a lot of people.
42 posted on 01/09/2004 4:54:47 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
PING! To Post 19. This is RICH!
43 posted on 01/09/2004 4:55:18 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
LOL, you were already on top of it.

I agree with you, that it would not be out of the way, if someone from the defense had something to do with it in its inception, or if at least they were already aware of the fraud. Oh, if ONLY that could be proven to the CA Bar Association!
44 posted on 01/09/2004 4:58:21 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse; Canadian Outrage; Velveeta; MaggieMay; Sandylapper; runningbear; ...
I found this thread today...LMAO!!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1022174/posts
45 posted on 01/09/2004 5:00:34 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Hey TJ, how about posting that visual for our evening viewing pleasure?? I usually look for your pics in the EARLY AM because you and CD are ALWAYS at the top of the thread...
And I know that it's early, I start at 6AM.
46 posted on 01/09/2004 5:04:43 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs
LOL - Good one!!
47 posted on 01/09/2004 5:05:03 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
I think the POISON that comes out of Geragos's mouth all the time is going to influence Jurors and not the way HE wants. By trial time, they should sufficiently hate him along with his crass client and his crass family!! The Rocha's are going to stand out with the class and likeablity of Royalty!!
48 posted on 01/09/2004 5:09:12 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Thanks Jackie. I emailed Fox. It makes my blood boil that these Ottawa Communist Liberals will not allow Fox into Canada. Who do these Frenchified freaks think they are??
49 posted on 01/09/2004 5:42:40 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Hmph! How DARE they? :)

Well, I paid THAT bunch a little visit, and gave them a piece of my mind!
50 posted on 01/09/2004 5:59:49 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Oh, now you got me started..or wait, I started this!
I'm going to see what you posted and put my 2 cents in!!!
51 posted on 01/09/2004 6:10:21 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
This is just priceless! Wouldn't you love to be a fly on the wall at Geragos' office today?
52 posted on 01/09/2004 6:33:30 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
That was probably after the Professor told the students to watch for more Modestans in favor of the death penalty. And the prof assigns this "project" over a long holiday weekend??? LOL

53 posted on 01/09/2004 6:36:10 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Duly noted! We also need a category for Koala bears and the Chicago Bears.
54 posted on 01/09/2004 6:38:17 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
Make sure you visit the link I posted at #54 here and put YOUR 2 cents in!
55 posted on 01/09/2004 6:56:58 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
I suspect that a fly who listened might find that the Geragos law firm was not nearly as surprised to find the poll a fraud, as were the rest of us!
56 posted on 01/09/2004 7:08:01 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Hola, and you know, I've had a queasy feeling that Dalton never left the team, just went underground for damage control. He was always their search and destroy front line man, went a little too far and had to take a little wup *$$, a la dismissal, so they say.

However, I would venture some of the pro Scott sites (I saw some recently that had atrocious posts, accusations against Ron and others in Laci's family regarding her death that screamed Dalton---one forum disappeared rather quickly and is "under construction" now), the Jo Ellen appearances and other media manipulations are being engineered somewhat by this charm boy. MG is awfully busy at the moment you know, with the gloved wonder.

I keep waiting for him to come to the aid any day for the stunted mouseketeer, MS Britney. I feel certain she will soon be finding herself in need of MG services, and then won't that work out nicely for Scooter! Why he could have his next pliable, easily charmed girlfriend who just loves to have a good time close at hand. Actually, it's beginning to look like MG's perfect formula: lawyer for all arrested development of the morally challenged, while financially endowed=manna from heaven for MG. No crime too heinous, too morally corrupt, or too frivolously sad, MG can be had.
57 posted on 01/09/2004 9:12:51 PM PST by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
I rather see the Judge beat the "$h1t outta him!! Geragos and ALL those connected with him, have shown NO respect for this GAG order hardly at all!! MG is way past due for some severe discipline.!
58 posted on 01/09/2004 9:46:53 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Roberts
Great post Rusty!! I agree whole heartedly. EVERYTHING about this Defense team and its' "players" stinketh!!
59 posted on 01/09/2004 9:50:52 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Roberts
LOL, "no crime too heinous, too morally corrupt, or too frivolously sad, MG can be had"--for a price, since MG is heinous, morally corrupt, and definitely is frivolously sad!

Britney would chew Scott up and spit him out. He wishes! WE wish! She's perfect for him.

I shudder to think that Dalton is still on the team. Even if he's really gone, it is apparent that his methods are certainly still there. My opinion is that the defense team, at the very least, had a sneaking suspicion that this survey was fraudulent from the beginning. If that is the case, I pray that they are found out. Bar complaint city!!
60 posted on 01/10/2004 4:49:56 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson