Skip to comments.
Washington Times Criticized for Revoking Pro-Life Spokeswoman's Award
LifeNews.com ^
| January 1, 2004
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 01/09/2004 1:34:48 PM PST by nickcarraway
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The Washington Times newspaper is receiving criticism for disqualifying Patricia Heaton, an Emmy-award winning actress and Feminists for Life's honorary chairman, from winning a new annual award.
In December, the newspaper took votes from readers for its first annual "Nobles and Knaves" contest, to celebrate and bemoan the best and worst people of the year.
Feminists for Life was pleased to see that Heaton, a star on the hit comedy series "Everybody Loves Raymond," was one of the nominees for Noble of the Year.
The pro-life organization receives hundreds of emails each time Heaton stands up for the pro-life perspective and pro-life groups frequently request her to speak at conferences and banquets.
When Feminists for Life learned Heaton had been nominated by the Times for the award, the group emailed its members and encouraged them to vote for her at the newspaper's web site.
That's when the Washington Times cried foul and disqualified Heaton from winning, even though she received more than twice the number of votes as did British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the second place finisher.
"Miss Heaton, an unabashed backer of the right-to-life movement, received far more votes than any other candidate," the Washington Times said in an article accompanying the award announcement. "However, many of those entries were apparently inspired by an e-mail that went to the information list of the group Feminists for Life."
"We are loathe to discourage responses to this contest or diminish the actions of Miss Heaton, whose public support of the pro-life cause deserves high praise," the paper continued. "However, the mailing violated the spirit, if not the letter, of this contest."
In a letter to the editor published by the Times, FFL's President Serrin Foster wrote, "We would have been happy to abide by any contest rules, had they been published."
Foster said no rules were given for the contest -- only that readers vote for their favorite nobles and knaves.
"Our members feel a special connection to Miss Heaton, whose fresh pro-woman perspective and enthusiasm give a powerful public voice to their own pro-life feminist commitments. Naturally, we wanted to inform them that she had been nominated to become a Noble," Foster explained.
"Even if our members had not been emailed an announcement celebrating Patricia Heaton's nomination and directing them to The Washington Times, we are certain that she would have scored highly," Foster concluded.
"What distinguishes Feminists for Life...is our long-term commitment to those brave mothers" of unexpected pregnancies, Heaton wrote in the "Rewarding Motherhood" issue of FFL's quarterly, The American Feminist.
Since joining FFL, Heaton's priority has been to restore motherhood's dignity and celebrate womanhood, because women deserve better than abortion. As Heaton says, "Women who experience an unplanned pregnancy also deserve unplanned joy."
Related web sites:
Feminists for Life - http://www.feministsforlife.org
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; award; entertainment; feministsforlife; media; patriciaheaton; press; prolife; wt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Patricia Heaton
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
49 |
Germany |
50.00
|
1
|
50.00
|
34
|
1.47
|
|
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; Salvation; NYer; SpookBrat; Brad's Gramma; Litany; Alamo-Girl; ...
ping
3
posted on
01/09/2004 1:38:37 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: nickcarraway
When Feminists for Life learned Heaton had been nominated by the Times for the award, the group emailed its members and encouraged them to vote for her at the newspaper's web site.
I bet they were shocked to discover this happening to them. I mean, Lib's never do this!
4
posted on
01/09/2004 1:40:11 PM PST
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: nickcarraway
I am very disappointed in the Times. They sound like those soreheads at leftist publications who complain that their online polls didn't come out the way they should have because they were Freeped!
5
posted on
01/09/2004 1:43:04 PM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
To: nickcarraway
Didn't she also refuse to go on that music awards program when the other presenters were swearing and behaving like idiots liberals?
To: nickcarraway
FINALLY A PATRICIA HEATON PHOTO THREAD!!!
7
posted on
01/09/2004 1:51:13 PM PST
by
Naspino
(My unspelling iz intenchonal.)
To: L.N. Smithee
I agree. Patricia Heaton is a person of great courage to be as out-front as she is on this issue, considering the industry she works in (I'm surprised she hasn't been blacklisted). She's #1 with me. Shame on the Wash Times.
8
posted on
01/09/2004 1:52:58 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: L.N. Smithee; nickcarraway
I am very disappointed in the Times.As is this subsriber as well! Time to fire off a letter to the editor, I see.
9
posted on
01/09/2004 1:54:13 PM PST
by
FormerLib
(We'll fight the good fight until the very end!)
To: Naspino
10
posted on
01/09/2004 1:54:32 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: My2Cents
I almost called into Boortz I think it was when he was asking who the most admired woman of 2003 should be. Hillary? Puhlease. Patricia is the only woman out there with courage to go against the grain and speak for what is right.
11
posted on
01/09/2004 2:01:03 PM PST
by
Naspino
(My unspelling iz intenchonal.)
To: My2Cents
Look who else like Patricia!
12
posted on
01/09/2004 2:02:18 PM PST
by
Naspino
(My unspelling iz intenchonal.)
To: nickcarraway
13
posted on
01/09/2004 2:07:41 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
To: Naspino
I subscribe to the Washington Times and will defend it against spurious charges, even from the Pro-life groups I usually admire. The group packed the vote making some more deserving individuals come in far below Miss Heaton. What annoys me is the Times caught them at vote packing, GENTLY rebuked the group, who then used the incident to generate more publicity. Here is the Washington Times'editorial on the issue. Decide for yourself.
Last year, your responses made the first annual Nobles and Knaves Contest a huge success. You made it even better this year. Hundreds of entries were sent in before the ball dropped in Times Square, although their final tally was only known after USC had won the college football championship (like the AP, Nobles and Knaves doesn't depend on computerized rankings).
Blurry eyes and headaches may have led to a few inaccuracies, but the top candidates in both categories emerged fairly quickly. Unsurprisingly, the war on terror had a significant effect on the outcome.
For Knave of the Year, Rep. Charles Rangel earned many nominations for asserting that Saddam Hussein's sons had been "assassinated." The unbearably biased BBC took even more votes. See-little-evil Hans Blix saw quite a bit of ire as well. However, Hollywood received most of the heckles. This year, you thumbed your noses and wagged your fingers (both of them) at the sophomoric stuck-up stars of the silver screen who incessantly scolded America and its president in a simple-minded and often obscene fashion. Actor Ed Harris received a score of votes, and Al Franken even more. Helen Thomas (who arguably plays the role of clown in the White House press corps) was named often for claiming that George W. Bush was the "worst president in American history." Tim Robbins and his loquacious liberal friends who prattled to the public about their supposed censorship so loudly and at such great length that they should have gone hoarse or better completely voiceless received even more votes.
Here are your top knaves, followed by the votes they received.
Traitor Brian Regan: 19
Ed Harris: 22
Al Franken: 32
Charles Rangel: 37
The BBC: 40
Hans Blix: 51
Helen Thomas: 68
Tim Robbins et al: 90
Dear Abby: 163*
Dear Abby's urging of a pregnant teen-ager to a Planned Parenthood clinic gave her the second-highest number of votes for Knave of the Year, but the Editorial Board deemed those results suspect (see below).
Ultimately, it was arguably the most polluted product to ever emerge from the automobile town of Flint, Mich., who pushed your buttons the hardest. His liberal outlook was coupled to a loud mouth and loutish behavior, like his diatribe during his Academy Awards acceptance speech and his despicable description of the heroes of Flight 93 during a performance in London.
With a total of 178 votes, Michael Moore is the Knave of the Year.
Action in Iraq also had a huge effect on the voting for Noble of the Year, although a few civilians also made the top 10. Shoeshiner Albert Lexie, who has given more than $90,000 to a children's hospital, received a number of votes, as did retired Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal and Frankie Mayo, the founder of Operation Air Conditioner. Most of the rest were related to the military, such as sharp-eyed machine gunner Army Spec. James Ross, honorary veteran Bob Hope, and the members of the National Guard and Reserves, who continue to make awesome sacrifices in service to their country.
Here are your top nobles, followed by the votes they received.
The Tories who supported British Prime Minister Tony Blair: 14
Simon Wiesenthal: 15
Army Spec. Hilario Bermanis: 17
Army Spec. James Ross: 23
Frankie Mayo: 27
Albert Lexie: 36
Bob Hope: 114
Members of the National Guard and Reserves: 123
Patricia Heaton: 372*
Miss Heaton, an Emmy-Award winning actress and an unabashed backer of the right-to-life movement, received far more votes than any other candidate. However, as in the case of Dear Abby, many of those entries were apparently inspired by an e-mail that went to the information list of the group Feminists for Life. We are loathe to discourage responses to this contest or diminish the actions of Miss Heaton, whose public support of the pro-life cause deserves high praise. However, the mailing violated the spirit, if not the letter, of this contest. It is intended to provide you, the readers of the Saturday feature, an opportunity to use your judgment and voice your opinion. Your responses and regular readership are what really give this feature its unique place on the Editorial Page.
So, in its benevolence, and in order to protect the power of the individual voter, the Editorial Board decided to give an "honorable mention" to Miss Heaton, but to bestow the honor of Noble of Year on another. He has been one of staunchest supporters of the United States and one of its most eloquent spokesmen. That determined course cost him dearly. It almost destroyed him. Yet, British Prime Minister Tony Blair neither prevaricated in speech nor veered in course. His support of the Iraq action was unstinting during both the war of words in the British Parliament and the battlefields around Basra.
With a total of 159 votes, the Noble of the Year is British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
The fun begins again in this space next week. See you then.
To: catonsville
If Tony Blair's supporters had been organized he could have won fair and square. The poll should have stated that the top and bottom vote getters would be thrown out in favor of the average winner.
15
posted on
01/09/2004 2:18:05 PM PST
by
Naspino
(My unspelling iz intenchonal.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Good one. Keep 'em coming. I've endured Helen Thomas pix enough times.
16
posted on
01/09/2004 2:20:11 PM PST
by
Naspino
(My unspelling iz intenchonal.)
To: Naspino
Great pic. W looks like he's got that little shoulder laugh going. As far as I'm concerned, not only is Patricia Heaton a woman of great courage, she's gorgeous (as are ALL conservative women).
17
posted on
01/09/2004 2:24:26 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: catonsville
Fine, but since the Wash Times runs its contest in a manner which invites the stuffing of the ballot box, so to speak, they have no one to blame but themselves. And if Feminists for Life, and other pro-life groups, are passionate enough to mount a major get-out-the-vote for one of their own, more power to them. It seems petty on the part of the Wash. Times to establish an online awards contest, and then to reject the winner simply because they didn't like the results.
18
posted on
01/09/2004 2:27:38 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again...")
To: tongue-tied
She walked out of one of the way-too-many Hollywood award shows when the host (forget their names, but their British, curse a lot using the F word, have two ugly, rude, horrible children, and now the wife has her own talk show) cursed too much. She has guts and determination to stick to her guns. Of course, the y removed her name...she has too much integrity to win their contest.
To: nickcarraway
Thanks for the ping!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson