To: areafiftyone
Uh... then what was the substance? LSD? Purple Punch? This WMD - no WMD is getting tiresome and unbelievable.
2 posted on
01/14/2004 10:07:58 AM PST by
rhombus
To: areafiftyone
Reuters just "had" to throw that last sentence in there, didn't they?
Sheesh, bunch of damned losers.....
3 posted on
01/14/2004 10:12:27 AM PST by
CTOCS
To: areafiftyone
These shells were reportedly filled with some sort of liquid. Is there a credible explanation for a liquid-filled mortar shell other than WMD dispersal? Perhaps these were training rounds?
4 posted on
01/14/2004 10:15:11 AM PST by
MikeJ
To: areafiftyone
hmmmm, objective
reporting?
Tests by U.S. experts from the Iraq Survey Group on five of the shells have shown no trace of chemical weapons, the Danish military said. However, more tests are needed and "the ISG wants a final confirmation, so the results will be sent to the Idaho National Environment Engineering Laboratory," the military said in a statement.
Two tests conducted by the British and two more by Danish experts this week came up positive for blister agents, Danish spokesman, Capt. Kim Vibe Michelsen, told The Associates Press.
To: areafiftyone
Another lame rationalization for this foolish Wilsonian war is slowly biting the dust.
To: areafiftyone
...Danish tests show arms found in Iraq not chemical What about a nice powdered donut test? Did that show any chemicals? Perhaps the dreaded dinner roll test..Anything?
Reminds me of Midnight Run, the scene in Reds Bar.."Give it the litmus test"..."
23 posted on
01/14/2004 12:25:11 PM PST by
SGCOS
To: areafiftyone
Laughing gas--uh huh, trust me on this. No really.
42 posted on
01/15/2004 9:09:19 AM PST by
5by5
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson